Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCompromise renderer process (prerequisite)
-
DeliveryLure user to crafted HTML page
-
ExploitTrigger improper GPU state validation
-
ExecutionEscape browser sandbox (scope change)
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Unusual condition handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to FIRST have compromised Chrome's renderer process - this is a sandbox-escape primitive, not a standalone remote entry point - and additionally requires the victim to load attacker-controlled content (UI:R) that reaches the vulnerable GPU code path. The CVSS AC:H indicates conditions beyond the attacker's direct control must align to trigger the improper state validation; the trigger mechanism beyond 'crafted HTML page' and 'improper state validation in GPU' is not described in the available sources. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk below the 8.3 score: the mandatory prior renderer compromise, required user interaction, and high attack complexity; affected only on versions prior to 157.0.8103.38. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed but point to a genuine, non-emergency priority. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 8.3 (High) with S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H reflecting a full sandbox escape (SSVC Technical Impact: total), but AC:H and UI:R meaningfully dampen real-world exploitability, and the published vector shows PR:N even though the description explicitly requires an attacker who has ALREADY compromised the renderer process - so this is a second-stage chaining bug, not a standalone remote RCE. That conflict should be noted: CVSS PR:N implies no prior privilege, yet the description implies a prerequisite renderer compromise, so treat PR:N as a Chromium scoring convention rather than evidence of trivial unauthenticated exploitation. SSVC reports Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and the input provides no KEV listing and no EPSS score, which argues against widespread opportunistic exploitation. The vuln.today Decision label is this_week, consistent with a patch-promptly (not drop-everything) posture. Net: a real, high-impact sandbox-escape primitive valuable inside an exploit chain, but gated behind a prior renderer compromise, user interaction, and high attack complexity - patch within the vendor's normal cycle rather than as an active-exploitation emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved code execution inside Chrome's renderer (via a separate renderer bug) lures a victim into loading a crafted HTML page that triggers improper GPU state validation, allowing code to execute outside the sandbox on the host. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) plus required user interaction (UI:R) constrain reliability and reach. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Sandbox escape in Google Chrome's GPU component (all versions prior to 157.0.8103.38) lets an attacker who has already compromised the renderer process execute arbitrary code outside the browser sandbox when a victim loads a crafted HTML page. The flaw is improper state validation in GPU handling (CWE-754); the trigger mechanism beyond 'crafted HTML page' is not described in the available sources. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the issue is not in CISA KEV, and SSVC records Exploitation: none with Automatable: no - the 8.3 score is driven by the total technical impact of a successful sandbox escape, not by observed activity, and realistic risk is lowered by the mandatory prior renderer compromise, required user interaction, and high attack complexity.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Google Chrome 157.0.8103.38, published in the November 2026 Stable Channel Update for Desktop (https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/11/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html). Update through Chrome's built-in updater (Settings > About Chrome) or the platform package manager, then fully restart the browser so the new binary is loaded, and verify the version string reports 157.0.8103.38 or later; details are also tracked at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/516958782. No workaround is documented in the available sources, and because the flaw requires a previously compromised renderer to reach the GPU code path, the complete fix is the patched build - the sandbox and site isolation should not be disabled as an interim measure, since doing so widens exposure rather than reducing it. Downstream Chromium-based browsers should be updated once their vendors ship builds rebased on this Chrome version.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Chrome's multi-process architecture isolates untrusted web content in a renderer process that is confined by the OS-level sandbox; the GPU process sits outside that confinement boundary and services graphics work on the renderer's behalf. This CVE is a failure of state validation (CWE-754, improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions) in that GPU-side logic, meaning the GPU process accepts and acts on state that a compromised renderer should never be able to induce. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects exactly this: the vulnerable component is Chrome's GPU handling, while the impacted component is the underlying operating system, where code execution lands outside the sandbox. The vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) means unauthenticated remote delivery over the network with a required victim interaction, and AC:H indicates that conditions beyond the attacker's direct control must align - the available sources do not describe what those conditions are beyond the crafted HTML page reaching the vulnerable GPU code path. Because the attack begins with an already-compromised renderer, this is a sandbox-escape primitive that would normally be chained behind a separate renderer exploit, not a standalone entry point.
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
AV:N and UI:R for a crafted web page; AC:H as the GPU state condition is not attacker-controlled; PR:N per Chromium convention (renderer compromise is a chain precondition, not a privilege); S:C with full C/I/A for the sandbox escape.
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Improper state validation in GPU in Google Chrome prior to 157.0.8103.38 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome versions prior to 157.0.8103.38 contain a high-severity sandbox escape vulnerability that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the browser's protective sandbox. While no public exploit has been identified, a successful attack requires prior compromise of the renderer process and user interaction, meaning the flaw poses a meaningful but not immediate threat to organizational endpoints running unpatched Chrome. Leadership should prioritize patching to close this defense-in-depth gap and prevent potential full system compromise in chained attack scenarios.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-116509
GHSA-27wq-vhrw-8345
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB