Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to local management interface as admin
  2. Exploit
    Submit oversized input to vulnerable field
  3. Execution
    Overflow fixed-size stack buffer (CWE-787)
  4. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code on appliance

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold administrative privileges AND have access to the local management interface of IBM Security Verify Access (10.0 through 10.0.9.2) or IBM Verify Identity Access (11.0 through 11.0.3), including their container variants. The code execution is triggered by supplying input that exceeds a fixed-size stack buffer (CWE-787 unbounded write). Limiting factors: this is not reachable by unauthenticated or low-privileged users - it presupposes administrative control of the appliance's management plane, which should itself be network-segmented and access-restricted; there is no user-interaction requirement (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once an admin can reach the management interface the overflow is reliably triggerable.

Impact

This is a high-CVSS (7.2) but comparatively low-real-world-urgency issue. The CVSS vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) requires PR:H - confirmed authenticated with administrative privileges - and the description further narrows this to attackers who already have access to the local management interface. All signals align on low current risk: SSVC reports Exploitation=none and Automatable=no with only partial technical impact, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit was identified. Note a tension to verify with the vendor: the CVSS vector asserts AV:N (network) while the description states the attacker needs access to the 'local management interface,' which implies restricted/management-plane reachability rather than open internet exposure - the network vector likely reflects the web-based admin console rather than unauthenticated internet access. The practical consequence is that an already-privileged administrator can escalate from configuration control to arbitrary code execution on the appliance (a trust-boundary / defense-in-depth break), which is meaningful for hardening but not a mass-exploitation priority. Patch availability from IBM makes this straightforward to remediate during normal maintenance.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained administrative credentials for the IBM Security Verify Access / Verify Identity Access management interface submits an oversized value to a vulnerable input field, overflowing a fixed-size stack buffer and executing arbitrary code on the underlying appliance. No public exploit code has been identified, and exploitation is gated behind existing administrative access, so this is realistically an insider or post-compromise privilege/trust-boundary escalation rather than an initial access vector.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Oct 09, 2026

Arbitrary code execution is possible in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 (including their container editions) when an attacker who already holds administrative privileges on the appliance and can reach the local management interface supplies input that overflows a fixed-size stack buffer. The assessed CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) with CWE-787 as the root cause, so the flaw is high-severity on impact but gated by a strong prerequisite: administrative control of the management plane rather than unauthenticated reach. Patch available per vendor advisory (IBM support page node/7291628); there is no CISA KEV entry and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC decision points record Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: partial.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Oct 08, 2026 - 21:41 CVSS 5.5

Arbitrary code execution is possible on IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3, including their containerized editions, but only for an attacker who already holds administrative privileges and has access to the local management interface (LMI). The flaw is an unbounded write into a fixed-size stack buffer (CWE-787) reachable through LMI input, which can corrupt memory and, under the conditions described, lead to code execution. With a CVSS base of 5.5 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H), the requirement for pre-existing admin authentication drastically narrows the attacker population to malicious insiders or actors who have already compromised administrative credentials; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix documented in the IBM advisory (https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7291628); patch availability is confirmed by IBM but no exact fixed build string is provided in the source data, so consult the advisory for the specific 10.0.x and 11.0.x maintenance levels that remediate the overflow and upgrade the appliance and any container images to those levels. Because exploitation requires an authenticated administrator with access to the local management interface, the most effective compensating controls are tightening that management plane: restrict the management interface to a dedicated, network-segmented administrative VLAN or bastion host and block it from general user and internet-facing networks (trade-off: administrators must route through the jump host, adding operational friction); disable or firewall any management endpoints that are not in active use, including leaving remote management off where an on-console workflow is viable; and enforce least privilege and strong authentication on administrative accounts with prompt credential rotation for any account that had management access, since a compromised admin is the sole prerequisite for this flaw. These mitigations reduce exposure but do not eliminate the underlying unbounded stack write, so patching remains the only complete fix; detection should focus on unexpected crashes or restarts of management services, which are the most likely visible symptom of an attempted overflow.

Affected VersionsENISA

Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 ≤11.0.3
Security Verify Access 10.0 ≤10.0.9.2
Security Verify Access Container 10.0 ≤10.0.9.2
Verify Identity Access 11.0 ≤11.0.3

Affected Packages

euvd security_verify_access no fix
euvd security_verify_access_container no fix
euvd verify_identity_access no fix
euvd verify_identity_access_container no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The defect is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in which attacker-controlled input is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without a length check, corrupting adjacent stack memory and allowing control-flow hijack and code execution in the context of the management service. The affected code path sits behind the local management interface of the identity/access-management appliance, which is why the CVSS vector carries PR:H: exploitation is only reachable by an authenticated administrator with local management access, even though AV:N/AC:L/UI:N indicate a remote transport and a reliable, low-complexity trigger once that interface is reachable. The CPE data confirms four affected artifacts in the same code family - ibm:security_verify_access, ibm:verify_identity_access, ibm:security_verify_access_container, and ibm:verify_identity_access_container - so the appliance, the standalone product, and their containerized distributions all share the vulnerable buffer-handling code. Because the corruption is a classic stack overflow rather than a logic error, reliability of the exploit is limited mainly by memory-layout factors, which is consistent with the SSVC 'Automatable: no' assessment.

Know when Security Verify Access gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.2 HIGH

Admin access to the management interface is required, so PR:H; the web-based management console is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L); arbitrary code execution yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Oct 09, 2026 - 14:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Oct 09, 2026 - 14:37 NVD
5.5 (MEDIUM) 7.2 (HIGH)

DescriptionNVD

IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an attacker with administrative privileges and access to the local management interface to execute arbitrary code due to an unbounded write to a fixed-size stack buffer.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Security Verify Access (10.0-10.0.9.2) and IBM Verify Identity Access (11.0-11.0.3), including container editions, contain a high-severity buffer overflow that can lead to arbitrary code execution by an authenticated administrative user with local management interface access. Although exploitation requires prior administrative privileges, a successful attack could compromise the integrity and availability of critical identity and access management services, potentially enabling broader unauthorized access to protected systems. Security leadership should prioritize patching to mitigate risks from insider threats or compromised administrative accounts.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise IAM access-management appliance, common in large orgs but not everywhere
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

CVE-2024-35133 HIGH POC
8.2 Aug 29

IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 OIDC Provider could allow a remote authenticated attacker to conduct ph

CVE-2024-28787 CRITICAL
10.0 Apr 04

IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 through 10.0.7 and IBM Application Gateway 20.01 through 24.03 could allow a remote at

CVE-2026-78401 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity A

CVE-2026-78406 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 08

Remote code execution is achievable in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 1

CVE-2026-11928 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 15

An out-of-bounds write in IBM Verify Identity Access (and its predecessor branding, IBM Security Verify Access, plus bot

CVE-2024-49806 CRITICAL
9.8 Nov 29

IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or crypto

CVE-2024-49805 CRITICAL
9.8 Nov 29

IBM Security Verify Access Appliance 10.0.0 through 10.0.8 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or crypto

CVE-2020-4499 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 15

IBM Security Access Manager 9.0.7 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 could allow an unauthorized public Oauth client

CVE-2026-11921 CRITICAL
9.1 Sep 15

IBM Verify Identity Access (formerly IBM Security Verify Access) in container and appliance deployments can silently fai

CVE-2026-16916 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Remote code execution is possible in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.

CVE-2026-19482 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Arbitrary command execution in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 thro

CVE-2026-18740 HIGH
8.8 Oct 08

Authenticated argument injection in IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy