Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach FortiSandbox HTTP interface over network
-
DeliverySend crafted HTTP requests
-
ExploitBypass authentication via alternate path
-
ExecutionExecute unauthorized code or commands
-
ImpactCompromise sandbox appliance
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Alternate path authentication
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets the FortiSandbox HTTP interface: an attacker sends crafted HTTP requests that abuse an alternate path or channel to bypass authentication (CWE-288), then executes unauthorized code or commands. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N), no authentication and no user interaction are required, implying exploitability against default/standard configurations reachable over the network. The available sources do NOT describe a specific feature toggle or non-default configuration prerequisite, nor the exact mechanism of the alternate-channel bypass. The primary limiting factor is network reachability to the FortiSandbox or FortiSandbox PaaS management/HTTP service - appliances whose management interface is not exposed to untrusted networks present a reduced attack surface. Affected deployments include on-premises FortiSandbox 5.0.0-5.0.6, 4.4.0-4.4.9, 4.2 (all), and FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0-5.0.6, 4.4 (all), 4.2 (all). |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority issue, not a high-CVSS/low-real-risk case. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H, 9.8) describes a remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity authentication bypass (CWE-288, alternate path/channel) leading to unauthorized code or command execution - the most dangerous combination of metrics. The vuln.today decision label is 'act_now', and the issue was reported by Fortinet itself via PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-185, which corroborates the severity signal. Several signals that would normally sharpen prioritization are MISSING from the input: no EPSS exploitation-probability score is provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no proof-of-concept or exploit reference is present. Therefore, despite the maximal CVSS and 'act_now' label, there is no evidence of active exploitation or public exploit code at this time - the urgency rests on the intrinsic severity of an unauthenticated auth-bypass-to-code-execution flaw in a security appliance, not on observed in-the-wild activity. Treat it as an urgent patch given the attack surface, while noting the exploitation-likelihood data is absent rather than confirmed. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote attacker with network reachability to the FortiSandbox management/HTTP interface sends specially crafted HTTP requests that exploit the alternate-path authentication bypass, gaining access without valid credentials. Because the flaw permits execution of unauthorized code or commands, the attacker can then run commands on the appliance. No public proof-of-concept or exploit code is identified in the available data, and the precise request structure is not described in the sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 26, 2026
Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox and FortiSandbox PaaS allows remote attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands through crafted HTTP requests. The flaw (CWE-288, alternate path or channel bypass) carries a 9.8 CVSS score with a PR:N/UI:N vector, meaning no credentials or user interaction are needed against the exposed HTTP interface; affected releases are FortiSandbox 5.0.0-5.0.6, 4.4.0-4.4.9 and 4.2 (all versions), plus FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0-5.0.6, 4.4 (all) and 4.2 (all). No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry is present in the supplied data, but the vendor-reported severity and the act_now priority label make this a genuine high-priority issue; internet-exposed management interfaces carry the greatest exposure.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch version is identifiable from the supplied data, so consult Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-26-185 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-185) and apply the fixed firmware branches listed there for FortiSandbox 5.0, 4.4 and 4.2 and the corresponding FortiSandbox PaaS tenants. Because the vector is PR:N/UI:N over the network and the bypass operates through the HTTP interface, the most effective compensating control is to remove that interface from untrusted networks: restrict management/HTTP access to dedicated administrative networks or VPN, or limit it to trusted source addresses with firewall policies - acknowledging this constrains remote administration for legitimate operators. Where the appliance's HTTP service must remain reachable, front it with an access-control layer that only admits known administrative sources, and monitor HTTP request logs for anomalous requests that reach functionality without a prior authenticated session, since such requests would indicate attempted bypass; these measures reduce exposure but do not correct the underlying flaw.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
FortiSandbox is Fortinet's sandboxing appliance and cloud (PaaS) service for detonating suspicious files and analyzing their behavior; its web/HTTP management interface is the attack surface here. The root cause class is CWE-288, Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel: rather than defeating credential checks, the flaw lets crafted HTTP requests reach functionality through a path or channel that does not enforce the same authentication controls as the normal entry point, after which the attacker can execute unauthorized code or commands. Because the assessed vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact, no authentication and no user interaction are required, implying exploitability against default/standard configurations reachable over the network. The available sources do not describe a specific feature toggle or non-default configuration prerequisite, and the exact mechanism of the alternate-channel bypass is not described in the available sources. Affected CPEs are fortinet:fortisandbox and fortinet:fortisandbox_paas; the practical limiting factor is network reachability to the FortiSandbox or FortiSandbox PaaS management/HTTP service.
Know when Fortisandbox gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Crafted HTTP requests bypass authentication remotely with no privileges or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), yielding code/command execution with full C/I/A impact on the appliance.
Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).
CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.9, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox PaaS 4.4 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 4.2 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP requests
Articles & Coverage 1
Executive ViewAI
A critical authentication-bypass flaw in Fortinet FortiSandbox and FortiSandbox PaaS lets remote, unauthenticated attackers run unauthorized code or commands through crafted HTTP requests, so any internet-exposed instance is effectively open to intrusion with no credentials required. Because the appliance is a security control, its compromise can undermine malware detection and create a foothold deeper in the network, putting sensitive data and dependent business services at risk. Leadership should treat this as an immediate operational priority until mitigation or a vendor fix is in place.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Until a fix is available, remove internet exposure of FortiSandbox management/HTTP interfaces, restrict access to trusted management networks and VPN, apply vendor hardening guidance, enable enhanced logging and monitoring of the appliances, and review logs for signs of exploitation or unauthorized changes.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
More in Fortisandbox
View allOS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attac
Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve
OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege credentials to execute
Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS varia
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows una
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerabi
A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandb
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F
A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F
Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenti
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,
EUVD-2026-109831
GHSA-g63q-h893-6372
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB