Skip to main content

Fortinet FortiSandbox CVE-2026-26083

| EUVDEUVD-2026-29550 CRITICAL
Missing Authorization (CWE-862)
2026-05-12 fortinet GHSA-5cw8-3wjv-7mvq
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: fortinet
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed FortiSandbox HTTP interface
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted unauthenticated HTTP request
  3. Exploit
    Bypass missing authorization checks
  4. Execution
    Execute arbitrary system commands
  5. Impact
    Establish persistence or pivot laterally

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special conditions - remote unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations of network-accessible FortiSandbox instances. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N confirms no authentication, no user interaction, and low attack complexity. However, exploitation is practically limited by network reachability: FortiSandbox appliances are typically deployed on internal management networks rather than internet-facing infrastructure in security-conscious environments. Cloud and PaaS variants (FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.2-5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS all listed versions) may have greater internet exposure depending on customer deployment architecture. Organizations that restrict management interface access to specific administrative subnets via firewall rules effectively eliminate remote attack surface despite the vulnerability's presence.

Impact

This represents a critical pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability with CVSS 9.8 and worst-case exploitability metrics (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). The attack requires no user interaction, no credentials, and low technical complexity to exploit from the internet. However, real-world risk depends on FortiSandbox deployment patterns: these appliances are typically internal infrastructure components behind network perimeters, not directly internet-facing in most enterprise architectures. The absence of CISA KEV listing suggests no confirmed mass exploitation campaigns at publication time, though the vendor advisory publication indicates awareness of the issue through responsible disclosure. EPSS data not provided but would likely be moderate given Fortinet's profile as a high-value target and the simplicity of exploitation if endpoints are exposed. Organizations with internet-facing FortiSandbox management interfaces or those using Cloud/PaaS variants should treat this as an emergency patch priority. For air-gapped or strictly internal deployments, risk is lower but still requires urgent remediation given the code execution impact and potential for lateral movement if an attacker gains internal network access.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated remote attacker identifies an internet-exposed FortiSandbox management interface via reconnaissance scanning. The attacker crafts HTTP requests targeting vulnerable endpoints that lack authorization checks, bypassing authentication entirely due to the CWE-862 flaw. By manipulating request parameters, the attacker executes arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the FortiSandbox application (likely root or system-level on the appliance). The attacker establishes persistent access, exfiltrates malware analysis data and threat intelligence, or pivots to attack other network infrastructure.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – May 12, 2026

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. This CWE-862 missing authorization flaw affects sandbox analysis appliances across multiple deployment models with CVSS 9.8 (critical) severity. Fortinet has published vendor advisory FG-IR-26-136. No CISA KEV listing or public POC identified at time of analysis, though the trivial attack complexity (AC:L) and network vector without authentication (PR:N) indicate high exploitability if technical details emerge.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 May 12, 2026 - 18:00 CVSS 9.1

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. The vulnerability affects multiple deployment models including on-premises (versions 4.4.0-4.4.8, 5.0.0-5.0.1), Cloud (5.0.2-5.0.5), and PaaS (all versions from 21.3 through 23.4) due to missing authorization checks (CWE-862). With CVSS 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) and exploit maturity rated 'Functional' (E:F), this represents critical pre-authentication remote code execution requiring immediate patching. Fortinet has released patches with official advisory FG-IR-26-136.

RemediationAI

Apply vendor-released patches per Fortinet advisory FG-IR-26-136 at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-136 which should specify fixed versions for each deployment model (specific patch versions not independently confirmed from available data). Until patching is complete, implement compensating controls: restrict HTTP/HTTPS access to FortiSandbox management interfaces to trusted administrative networks only via firewall rules or ACLs (blocks remote unauthenticated access vector); disable external access to Cloud/PaaS management APIs if not operationally required; monitor HTTP access logs for unusual POST/PUT requests to administrative endpoints; deploy network-based intrusion prevention signatures if available from Fortinet for this CVE. Note that access restrictions may impact legitimate remote administration workflows and require VPN or jump host access. For PaaS deployments, coordinate remediation timeline with Fortinet as patching may be vendor-managed.

Affected VersionsENISA

FortiSandbox PaaS 22.2.4134
FortiSandbox PaaS 23.4.4350
FortiSandbox 4.2.1 ≤4.2.8
FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.0 ≤5.0.1
FortiSandbox Cloud 4.4.5 ≤4.4.8
FortiSandbox PaaS 21.3.4055
FortiSandbox PaaS 22.2.4151
FortiSandbox PaaS 23.3.4329
FortiSandbox 4.4.0 ≤4.4.8
FortiSandbox PaaS 4.4.5 ≤4.4.8
FortiSandbox PaaS 21.4.4072
FortiSandbox 5.0.0 ≤5.0.1
FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0 ≤5.0.1
FortiSandbox PaaS 22.1.4113
FortiSandbox PaaS 23.4.4374
FortiSandbox PaaS 23.1.4245

Affected Packages

euvd fortisandbox no fix
euvd fortisandbox_cloud no fix
euvd fortisandbox_paas no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

FortiSandbox is Fortinet's malware analysis and threat intelligence platform used to detonate suspicious files in isolated environments. This vulnerability stems from CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), meaning certain HTTP endpoints fail to verify caller permissions before executing privileged operations. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N indicates the flaw exists in network-accessible services with no authentication checks, likely in the web management interface or API layer. The affected CPE strings cover three distinct deployment models: cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox (on-premises appliances), cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_cloud (cloud-hosted instances), and cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_paas (platform-as-a-service). The breadth of affected versions (spanning releases from 21.3 through 5.0.5 depending on deployment model) suggests the authorization gap exists in core HTTP request handling code shared across all FortiSandbox variants.

Know when Fortisandbox gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
May 12, 2026 - 18:22 NVD
9.1 (CRITICAL) 9.8 (CRITICAL)
CVE Published
May 12, 2026 - 16:54 nvd
CRITICAL 9.1

DescriptionCVE.org

A missing authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.2 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.4 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.3 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 23.1 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 22.2 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 22.1 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 21.4 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 21.3 all versions, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox PaaS 4.4.5 through 4.4.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands through missing authorization controls, affecting all deployment models (on-premises, Cloud, PaaS). Organizations using FortiSandbox for malware analysis face immediate risk of sandbox compromise, which could be leveraged to bypass security controls and introduce malicious content into production environments.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to FortiSandbox management interfaces using firewall rules and VPN requirements-allow HTTP/HTTPS only from trusted analyst workstations and networks; (2) Disable or isolate FortiSandbox instances not immediately required for operations; (3) Monitor FortiSandbox logs for suspicious HTTP requests with unusual URI patterns or POST payloads; (4) Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block malformed or anomalous HTTP requests to FortiSandbox; (5) Segregate sandbox environments on isolated network segments with no direct access to production systems. Monitor Fortinet security advisories daily for patch release announcements.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 86% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2026-39808 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth

CVE-2026-25089 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 09

Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attac

CVE-2026-39813 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve

CVE-2025-53949 HIGH
8.8 Dec 09

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege credentials to execute

CVE-2026-26084 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 08

Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS varia

CVE-2025-52436 HIGH
8.8 Feb 10

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerabi

CVE-2024-31491 HIGH
8.8 May 14

A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandb

CVE-2024-21756 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2024-21755 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2021-26096 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenti

CVE-2021-26097 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,

CVE-2024-27781 HIGH
7.1 Feb 11

An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiS

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy