Skip to main content

Fortinet FortiSandbox CVE-2025-53679

HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2025-12-09 psirt@fortinet.com
7.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: fortinet
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain FortiSandbox admin credentials
  2. Delivery
    Reach management HTTP/HTTPS interface
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted request with injected shell metacharacters
  4. Execution
    Trigger unsanitized OS command execution
  5. Persist
    Run arbitrary commands on appliance
  6. Impact
    Pivot to sandboxed samples and network telemetry

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold high-privileged (administrator-level) credentials to the FortiSandbox or FortiSandbox Cloud management interface (CVSS PR:H), and network reachability to its HTTP or HTTPS service from the attacker's position. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once the credential and network preconditions are met, a single crafted HTTP/HTTPS request is sufficient. Limiting factors are therefore the strength and exposure of admin credentials, whether the management interface is restricted to trusthosts or a management network, and whether the deployed version falls within the listed vulnerable ranges (5.0.0-5.0.2, 4.4.0-4.4.7, all 4.2.x, all 4.0.x, Cloud 24.1, all Cloud 23.x).

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) signals that exploitation is network-reachable and low-complexity but requires high privileges, which materially shrinks the threat population to users who already hold administrative credentials on the appliance. There is no EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC provided in the available intelligence, so this should be treated as a credible but not-yet-actively-exploited issue at time of analysis. The real-world risk is concentrated in scenarios where admin credentials are shared, weakly protected, or already compromised - in those cases the appliance pivots from a detection tool into a full command-execution foothold inside the security stack, which is a high-value outcome for an attacker even though the raw CVSS suggests only High rather than Critical severity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained or coerced FortiSandbox administrator credentials - for example via phishing of a SOC engineer, reuse of leaked credentials, or pivoting from a compromised FortiManager - authenticates to the appliance and issues a crafted HTTP or HTTPS request to a vulnerable admin endpoint whose handler passes a parameter into a shell command. The injected shell metacharacters cause the appliance to execute arbitrary OS commands under the service account, giving the attacker code execution on a trusted security inspection device that sees decrypted samples and intra-environment telemetry. No public POC is available at time of analysis, so exploitation today would require independent reverse engineering of the patched endpoints.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 01, 2026

Authenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (versions 5.0.0-5.0.2, 4.4.0-4.4.7, all 4.2.x, all 4.0.x) and FortiSandbox Cloud (24.1 and all 23.x) allows a high-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests to the management interface. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the breadth of affected major versions and the network-reachable attack surface make this a notable post-authentication risk for security appliance operators.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory FG-IR-25-454 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-454); administrators should consult that page for the exact fixed builds in the 4.4, 5.0, and Cloud 24.1 trains, as the 4.0 and 4.2 branches may require upgrade to a supported major version rather than an in-train patch. Until upgrade is possible, restrict access to the FortiSandbox management HTTP/HTTPS interface to a dedicated management VLAN or jump-host source IPs using trusthost or upstream firewall ACLs, which blocks the network reachability the CVSS vector relies on at the cost of needing to manage admin access paths. Additionally, rotate any shared admin credentials, enforce per-administrator accounts with MFA where supported, and review appliance audit logs for unexpected admin API calls - these reduce the chance that the PR:H precondition is satisfied by an attacker, with the trade-off of operational overhead.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

FortiSandbox is Fortinet's network sandboxing appliance used to detonate suspicious files and URLs to detect advanced threats, exposing a web-based management API over HTTP/HTTPS. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), meaning at least one administrative HTTP/HTTPS handler concatenates attacker-controlled input into a shell or system call without proper sanitization or argument-array invocation. The CPE data confirms the flaw resides in the fortisandbox and fortisandbox_cloud product lines across the on-prem 4.0/4.2/4.4/5.0 trains and the 23/24.1 cloud branches, indicating a long-standing code path rather than a regression in a single recent release.

Know when Fortisandbox gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (fortinet) PRIMARY 7.2 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.2, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions, FortiSandbox Cloud 24.1, FortiSandbox Cloud 23 all versions allows a remote privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Fortinet FortiSandbox and FortiSandbox Cloud (versions 5.0, 4.4, 4.2, 4.0, and Cloud 24.1/23.x) contain an authenticated command injection vulnerability allowing high-privileged administrators to execute arbitrary OS commands on security appliances. This creates direct insider threat risk within critical security infrastructure, potentially compromising the integrity of sandbox-based threat analysis and incident response capabilities.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement: (1) Network segmentation-restrict management interface to dedicated administrative VLAN or jump host with multi-factor authentication; (2) Access controls-limit administrative accounts to principle of least privilege and enforce credential rotation; (3) Enhanced monitoring-enable and actively review management interface audit logs for unauthorized commands or privilege escalation attempts; (4) Network monitoring-implement IDS/IPS rules for anomalous OS command patterns on management ports; (5) Incident response-establish detection and response procedures for suspected command injection exploitation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 28% exploitable
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

37
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_cloud:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortisandbox_cloud:24.1.4436:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-39808 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and FortiSandbox PaaS versions 21.3-23.4 enables remote unauth

CVE-2026-25089 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 09

Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attac

CVE-2026-39813 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 14

Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve

CVE-2025-53949 HIGH
8.8 Dec 09

OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox allows an authenticated attacker with low-privilege credentials to execute

CVE-2026-26084 CRITICAL
9.9 Sep 08

Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS varia

CVE-2026-26083 CRITICAL
9.8 May 12

Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows una

CVE-2025-52436 HIGH
8.8 Feb 10

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerabi

CVE-2024-31491 HIGH
8.8 May 14

A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.4, FortiSandb

CVE-2024-21756 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2024-21755 HIGH
8.8 Apr 09

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet F

CVE-2021-26096 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

Multiple instances of heap-based buffer overflow in the command shell of FortiSandbox before 4.0.0 may allow an authenti

CVE-2021-26097 HIGH
8.8 Aug 04

An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in FortiSandbox 3.2.0 through 3.2.2,

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy