Fortisandbox Cloud
Monthly
Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS variants - allows network-reachable attackers to retrieve sensitive information and disrupt availability by sending crafted HTTP requests, with no credentials or user interaction required. Fortinet's confirmed CVSS temporal metrics include E:P (proof-of-concept exploit code exists) alongside RL:O (official remediation available) and RC:C (confirmed), establishing this as an actively documented, patchable risk against sandboxing infrastructure that processes enterprise malware submissions. The scope-changed vector (S:C) combined with high availability impact (A:H) indicates the access control failure cascades beyond the directly targeted HTTP endpoint to other components within the FortiSandbox platform.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests to the management interface. The flaw carries a CVSS 9.8 rating with network-reachable, no-authentication, no-user-interaction characteristics, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because FortiSandbox is a security-analysis appliance handling untrusted samples, compromise undermines the integrity of malware verdicts and downstream detections.
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. This CWE-862 missing authorization flaw affects sandbox analysis appliances across multiple deployment models with CVSS 9.8 (critical) severity. Fortinet has published vendor advisory FG-IR-26-136. No CISA KEV listing or public POC identified at time of analysis, though the trivial attack complexity (AC:L) and network vector without authentication (PR:N) indicate high exploitability if technical details emerge.
Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve full system compromise. With CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), the vulnerability permits network-based exploitation without credentials or user interaction, leading to complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Despite critical severity, EPSS score of 0.06% (18th percentile) indicates low observed exploitation probability. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV). SSVC framework marks it as automatable with total technical impact but no current exploitation. The incomplete CVE description (placeholder text for attack vector) suggests early disclosure; verify completeness with Fortinet advisory FG-IR-26-112.
FortiSandbox and FortiSandbox Cloud ship with a hard-coded cryptographic key that is used to validate or sign trusted HTTP requests, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker who knows that static key to craft requests the appliance treats as legitimate and thereby escalate privileges. Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, official score 5.3), no valid credentials or user interaction are required once the embedded key is known, though exploitation is limited to deployments that expose the HTTP/management interface to the attacker's network. Affected versions are FortiSandbox 5.2.0-5.2.1, 5.0.0-5.0.6 and all 4.4 releases, plus the corresponding FortiSandbox Cloud versions; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue is authoritative-moderate severity and should be remediated rather than treated as an emergency.
Authenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (versions 5.0.0-5.0.2, 4.4.0-4.4.7, all 4.2.x, all 4.0.x) and FortiSandbox Cloud (24.1 and all 23.x) allows a high-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests to the management interface. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the breadth of affected major versions and the network-reachable attack surface make this a notable post-authentication risk for security appliance operators.
Unauthenticated remote access control bypass in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.2.x through 5.0.x - and its Cloud and PaaS variants - allows network-reachable attackers to retrieve sensitive information and disrupt availability by sending crafted HTTP requests, with no credentials or user interaction required. Fortinet's confirmed CVSS temporal metrics include E:P (proof-of-concept exploit code exists) alongside RL:O (official remediation available) and RC:C (confirmed), establishing this as an actively documented, patchable risk against sandboxing infrastructure that processes enterprise malware submissions. The scope-changed vector (S:C) combined with high availability impact (A:H) indicates the access control failure cascades beyond the directly targeted HTTP endpoint to other components within the FortiSandbox platform.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (on-premise, Cloud, and PaaS variants) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by sending specifically crafted HTTP requests to the management interface. The flaw carries a CVSS 9.8 rating with network-reachable, no-authentication, no-user-interaction characteristics, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Because FortiSandbox is a security-analysis appliance handling untrusted samples, compromise undermines the integrity of malware verdicts and downstream detections.
Remote code execution in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.x through 5.0.x (on-premises, Cloud, and PaaS deployments) allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP requests. This CWE-862 missing authorization flaw affects sandbox analysis appliances across multiple deployment models with CVSS 9.8 (critical) severity. Fortinet has published vendor advisory FG-IR-26-136. No CISA KEV listing or public POC identified at time of analysis, though the trivial attack complexity (AC:L) and network vector without authentication (PR:N) indicate high exploitability if technical details emerge.
Path traversal in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0-4.4.8 and 5.0.0-5.0.5 enables remote unauthenticated attackers to achieve full system compromise. With CVSS 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), the vulnerability permits network-based exploitation without credentials or user interaction, leading to complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Despite critical severity, EPSS score of 0.06% (18th percentile) indicates low observed exploitation probability. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV). SSVC framework marks it as automatable with total technical impact but no current exploitation. The incomplete CVE description (placeholder text for attack vector) suggests early disclosure; verify completeness with Fortinet advisory FG-IR-26-112.
FortiSandbox and FortiSandbox Cloud ship with a hard-coded cryptographic key that is used to validate or sign trusted HTTP requests, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker who knows that static key to craft requests the appliance treats as legitimate and thereby escalate privileges. Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, official score 5.3), no valid credentials or user interaction are required once the embedded key is known, though exploitation is limited to deployments that expose the HTTP/management interface to the attacker's network. Affected versions are FortiSandbox 5.2.0-5.2.1, 5.0.0-5.0.6 and all 4.4 releases, plus the corresponding FortiSandbox Cloud versions; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the issue is authoritative-moderate severity and should be remediated rather than treated as an emergency.
Authenticated OS command injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox (versions 5.0.0-5.0.2, 4.4.0-4.4.7, all 4.2.x, all 4.0.x) and FortiSandbox Cloud (24.1 and all 23.x) allows a high-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests to the management interface. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the breadth of affected major versions and the network-reachable attack surface make this a notable post-authentication risk for security appliance operators.