Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local account
-
DeliveryInvoke vulnerable Windows Storage path
-
ExploitOverflow stack buffer (win race)
-
ExecutionExecute code as SYSTEM
-
ImpactFull host compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated local presence on the target: the attacker must already hold low-level privileges (PR:L) and execute code on the Windows host that drives input into the vulnerable Windows Storage stack buffer (CWE-121). There is no network vector (AV:L) and no user interaction required (UI:N), so a remote or phishing-only path does not apply. The principal limiting factor is high attack complexity (AC:H): reliable exploitation likely depends on winning a race condition or achieving a specific memory state, meaning exploitation is not guaranteed on a single attempt and is harder to weaponize than the 7.0 score implies. This is an escalation-from-foothold primitive, not an initial-access vulnerability. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority local privilege escalation rather than a top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.0 HIGH) tells a consistent story: the attacker must already have local access and low-level (authenticated) privileges, and must overcome high attack complexity (AC:H) - typical of a stack overflow that depends on a race window or non-deterministic memory layout in the Windows Storage component. If successfully triggered, impact is full (C:H/I:H/A:H), i.e. escalation to SYSTEM. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or weaponization. The signals do not conflict: a local-only, high-complexity, privilege-requiring bug with no exploitation evidence is a legitimate patch-in-cycle item, not a drop-everything issue. Note the key limiting factors (AC:H and PR:L) materially lower real-world risk below what the 7.0 base score alone might suggest. EPSS, KEV, and POC data are all MISSING from the input and should be checked against MSRC/CISA before final prioritization. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host (e.g., a standard user account or a compromised low-integrity process) runs a crafted program that supplies malformed input to the vulnerable Windows Storage code path, overflowing a stack buffer to hijack execution and escalate to SYSTEM. Because attack complexity is high (AC:H), the exploit likely must win a race or satisfy specific memory conditions and may need multiple attempts. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Microsoft's Windows Storage component allows an authenticated attacker who already holds low-level privileges on the host to trigger a stack-based buffer overflow and gain elevated (likely SYSTEM-level) code execution. The vulnerability is not remotely reachable and requires no user interaction, but the high attack complexity (AC:H) means exploitation likely depends on winning a race or achieving a precise memory state, so it is harder to weaponize than the 7.0 base score suggests. No public exploit code has been identified and it is not listed in CISA KEV; this is an escalation-from-foothold primitive rather than an initial-access vector, making it a moderate-priority local privilege escalation for patching rather than a top-tier emergency.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update referenced in the MSRC update guide for CVE-2026-100216 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-100216), which is the authoritative source for the exact affected builds and the corresponding fixed versions - no standalone KB or version string was provided in the input data, so do not apply a version number from any other source. Prioritize this as a moderate-priority local privilege escalation, focusing first on multi-user, RDP-accessible, and high-value servers where an attacker with a low-privilege foothold could chain it to SYSTEM. Where immediate patching is not possible, compensating controls include restricting interactive local logon and RDP access to only trusted accounts, removing or tightly scoping low-privilege service and application accounts that can execute untrusted binaries on storage-heavy hosts, and enforcing application control (WDAC or AppLocker) so that no unvetted code can drive input into the Storage stack - at the cost of added administrative overhead and possible friction for legitimate tooling. Additionally, monitor storage-related components for unexpected crashes or bugchecks, which can be an early indicator of attempted exploitation, and layer credential protection such as Credential Guard to constrain post-exploitation impact; note that these controls reduce exposure but do not eliminate the vulnerability, so patching remains the definitive fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 13 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) in the Windows Storage stack - the kernel-mode and supporting user-mode components that handle storage devices, volumes, and related I/O paths exposed to local callers. Because the vulnerable buffer lives on the stack, an attacker who can supply oversized or malformed input into the affected storage routine can overwrite adjacent stack memory, corrupting saved return addresses or control data and potentially redirecting execution in kernel context. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms this is a local-only primitive: the attacker must already be running code on the Windows host with low privileges, there is no network attack vector, and no user interaction is required. The AC:H rating is the key technical qualifier - reliable exploitation is not deterministic and typically demands precise heap/stack grooming or a favorable timing window, which substantially raises the bar for a working exploit and explains why the practical risk is lower than the raw 7.0 score. Microsoft's own advisory (linked below) should be consulted for the specific affected component and build matrix, as the provided data did not include CPE strings enumerating exact impacted editions.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only EoP requiring an existing low-priv account (AV:L/PR:L), high complexity consistent with a stack-overflow race (AC:H), yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity flaw in Microsoft's Windows Storage component could allow an attacker who already holds a local low-privilege foothold to elevate to likely SYSTEM-level code execution on affected Windows hosts. While no public exploit has been identified and exploitation is not remotely reachable, a successful local privilege escalation could enable deeper credential theft, lateral movement, and full system compromise on already-breached endpoints. Leadership should prioritize inventorying affected Windows systems and enforcing least privilege while monitoring for a vendor patch.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; enforce least privilege, restrict local interactive logon and local administrator rights, enable exploit protection and EDR, and monitor privileged group changes and Windows Storage or SYSTEM-level anomalies.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-100329
GHSA-7pw2-xgcx-f72m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB