Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttach malicious ZFS storage to device
-
DeliveryU-Boot parses on-disk ZFS metadata at boot
-
ExploitInteger overflow yields undersized allocation
-
ExecutionOut-of-bounds write corrupts bootloader memory
-
ImpactExecute code or crash during boot
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer overflow checks
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires (1) U-Boot compiled with ZFS filesystem support enabled, and (2) the attacker's ability to supply malformed ZFS on-disk metadata that U-Boot reads during boot - i.e. control over an attached/removable storage device or a writable ZFS partition in the boot path. Limiting factors: the vulnerable ZFS code is not enabled in many U-Boot builds; the trigger is consumed only during the boot process, so the attacker needs local or physical access to the storage the device boots from (or a prior foothold that lets them write boot media), not network access; and devices that boot solely from fixed, integrity-protected, non-ZFS storage are not realistically reachable despite the CVSS AV:N label. |
| Impact | The signals conflict and must be weighed carefully. The published CVSS:3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N (9.8, 'critical'), but the description says the trigger is 'malformed on-disk metadata' processed 'during the boot process' - that is a local/physical-storage vector, not a remote network one, so the AV:N rating is almost certainly wrong and inflates the score. EPSS agrees with the more sober reading: 0.17% (7th percentile) exploitation probability, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no confirmed exploitation. No SSVC decision was provided. Net assessment: this is a genuinely serious code-execution flaw in a trust-critical boot component (compromise here undermines secure/verified boot and any downstream trust), but it is not an internet-facing, mass-exploitable issue - an operator running a mid-sized fleet of embedded devices should prioritize it where devices boot from removable or externally writable ZFS storage, while low-EPSS and local-only reach mean it is not an emergency for devices that never touch attacker-controlled ZFS media. The high-CVSS-vs-low-real-reach gap should be resolved with the vendor before treating it as a network-critical item. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who can present a ZFS-formatted volume to the device - for example a malicious USB drive, SD card, or a tampered ZFS partition on attached storage - crafts on-disk metadata with values that overflow U-Boot's allocation math. When the device boots and U-Boot parses that ZFS metadata, the undersized buffer is overrun, letting the attacker crash the boot or execute code in the bootloader before the OS and its protections load. A gist reference is present in the feed that may contain proof-of-concept material, but its authenticity and functionality are unverified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 27, 2026
Memory corruption in Das U-Boot's ZFS filesystem driver (all releases before 2026.04) lets an attacker who controls the on-disk ZFS metadata trigger an integer overflow (CWE-190) that leads to undersized allocation and out-of-bounds access, enabling a boot-time crash or arbitrary code execution in the pre-OS bootloader context. Rated CVSS 9.8 by the reporter, but the flaw is reached only when U-Boot parses attacker-supplied ZFS storage during boot, so realistic exploitation is local/physical rather than network-borne. EPSS is low (0.17%, 7th percentile) and there is no confirmed active exploitation.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to U-Boot 2026.04 or later, which contains the fix; rebuild and reflash device firmware and re-sign boot images as required by your secure-boot chain. Where immediate upgrade is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to disable ZFS filesystem support in the U-Boot build configuration (drop CONFIG_FS_ZFS / ZFS command support) if the device does not need to boot from ZFS - this removes the vulnerable code path entirely, at the cost of losing ZFS boot capability. Additionally, restrict the boot order so devices boot only from trusted, non-removable, integrity-protected storage and disallow booting from user-attachable ZFS media (trade-off: reduces recovery/USB-boot flexibility), and enforce signed-image verification before ZFS parsing where the platform allows. Confirm the exact fixed version and any backports against the official U-Boot release notes; the http://u-boot.com reference in the feed is unverified, so validate advisories via denx.de or the U-Boot GitLab.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
U-Boot is the dominant open-source bootloader for embedded and IoT systems; it can mount several filesystems (ext4, FAT, ZFS, etc.) to load kernel and boot images. The vulnerability lives in the optional ZFS support, where fields from on-disk ZFS metadata are used in size arithmetic without adequate bounds checking. Per CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound), a crafted metadata value overflows during a size computation, so a subsequent allocation is too small; later reads/writes then run past the buffer (out-of-bounds access), corrupting adjacent memory in the bootloader's flat, largely unprotected execution environment. The CPE (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:n/a:*) is a placeholder and provides no usable product/version constraint.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Trigger is malformed on-disk ZFS metadata parsed at boot, so AV:L not AV:N; no auth or prior privilege needed (PR:N) and full code-execution impact gives C/I/A:H.
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).
CVSS VectorVendor: mitre
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
An issue was discovered in Denx U-Boot before 2026.04. An integer overflow vulnerability in the ZFS filesystem support can be triggered by malformed on-disk metadata. The issue may result in incorrect memory allocation followed by out-of-bounds memory access, potentially leading to a crash or arbitrary code execution during the boot process.
Executive ViewAI
Das U-Boot bootloader contains a critical memory corruption vulnerability in its ZFS driver that could cause boot failures or allow code execution at startup on affected systems. The vulnerability requires physical storage access to exploit and shows no confirmed active exploitation, limiting its immediate threat to organizations with strong physical security controls. Leadership should treat this as a medium-priority patching initiative given the severity of bootloader compromise balanced against the low likelihood of exploitation.
Restrict physical access to storage devices, especially those containing ZFS volumes; disable U-Boot's ZFS filesystem support if not operationally required; implement storage device-level authentication and encryption; enable bootloader integrity protections such as Secure Boot or TPM verification where available; monitor system boot logs and POST outputs for anomalies indicative of memory corruption or failed boot attempts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
Same weakness CWE-190 – Integer Overflow or Wraparound
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro Extras 6.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.0 | Affected |
EUVD-2025-210793
GHSA-j2xx-grh4-4p3q
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB