Skip to main content

CTFd CVE-2025-29419

| EUVDEUVD-2025-210783 HIGH
Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint (CWE-300)
2026-08-26 mitre GHSA-q57q-64xf-mphf
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY
7.1 HIGH
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI
7.1 HIGH

Adjacent-network vector confirmed by MITM class; no attacker authentication required; high confidentiality loss from session interception; limited integrity impact only.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Analysis Generated
Aug 31, 2026 - 20:36 vuln.today
CVSS changed
Aug 31, 2026 - 18:22 NVD
7.1 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Aug 26, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
HIGH 7.1
CVE Published
Aug 26, 2026 - 00:00 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

CTFd v3.7.6 was discovered to be vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack.

AnalysisAI

Man-in-the-middle interception in CTFd v3.7.6, a widely-used Capture The Flag competition platform, exposes high-confidentiality data to adjacent-network attackers with no authentication required. Rooted in CWE-300 (Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint), the flaw allows an attacker sharing the same network segment to intercept communications, capturing sensitive data such as session tokens or credentials, with limited integrity modification also possible. No active exploitation is confirmed - EPSS sits at 0.15% (4th percentile) and no CISA KEV listing exists - but the attack surface is acutely relevant in live CTF event environments where competitors and organizers routinely share the same LAN or Wi-Fi.

Technical ContextAI

CTFd is an open-source web-based platform for hosting Capture The Flag cybersecurity competitions, maintained at github.com/CTFd/CTFd. CWE-300 (Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint) identifies that the communication channel between clients and the CTFd server can be intercepted by a non-endpoint party - indicating either absent or improperly enforced transport encryption (TLS), or a scenario where sensitive data traverses an unprotected channel. The CVSS vector AV:A confirms that exploitation is constrained to the adjacent network (same LAN, WLAN, or broadcast domain), consistent with layer-2 MITM techniques such as ARP spoofing. A reference to the QingdaoU/OnlineJudge repository appears in the disclosure references, suggesting a possible shared codebase or dependency relationship, though this connection is not confirmed. CPE data in the NVD record is listed as 'n/a:n/a:*', meaning formal product enumeration has not been completed for this entry.

RemediationAI

No patched version of CTFd has been identified from the available references at the time of analysis; the vendor's GitHub repository (https://github.com/CTFd/CTFd) and official site (http://ctfd.com) should be monitored for a security release addressing CVE-2025-29419. As an immediate compensating control, operators should enforce HTTPS-only access by placing CTFd behind a TLS-terminating reverse proxy (e.g., nginx, Caddy, or Traefik) configured with a valid certificate authority-signed certificate and HTTP-to-HTTPS redirection - this eliminates the primary interception surface with minimal operational impact. Network isolation is a second control: restrict CTFd to a dedicated VLAN or network segment that separates the server from untrusted participant traffic, raising the bar for layer-2 MITM attacks; this is especially important during live competition events. HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers should also be configured to prevent protocol downgrade. These controls mitigate exploitation risk but do not resolve the root-cause vulnerability in the application itself.

More in N A

View all
CVE-2026-30623 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 15

Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr

CVE-2026-67917 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 17

SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg

CVE-2026-75337 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 27

Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ

CVE-2026-31072 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 19

Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali

CVE-2026-45185 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 12

Remote code execution in the Exim mail transfer agent (versions before 4.99.3) built against certain GnuTLS configuratio

CVE-2025-50455 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Jul 27

SQL injection in EasyAppointments <=1.5.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to extract and modify database contents via t

CVE-2026-36356 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 05

Unauthenticated remote OS command injection in MeiG Smart FORGE_SLT711 cellular gateway firmware MDM9607.LE.1.0-00110-ST

CVE-2026-31071 CRITICAL POC
9.1 May 19

Unauthenticated API access in LalanaChami Pharmacy Management System (commit 5c3d028) allows remote attackers to dump al

CVE-2025-66391 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 17

Privilege escalation via broken access control in Citrix Cloud (through 2025-11-10) lets a user holding only read-only p

CVE-2026-75419 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 27

go-wind-cms (GoWind) before 1.0.0 exposes all administrative APIs to any authenticated user because NewAuthorizer() retu

CVE-2026-26740 HIGH POC
8.2 Mar 18

Giflib 5.2.2 contains a buffer overflow in the EGifGCBToExtension function that fails to validate allocated memory when

CVE-2025-60464 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 25

Denial of service in GPAC's MP4Box multimedia tool (versions before 26.02.0) arises from a use-after-free in the gf_sei_

Share

CVE-2025-29419 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy