ConnectWise Automate
CVE-2025-11492
HIGH
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent/on-path network position
-
DeliveryIntercept cleartext HTTP agent traffic
-
ExploitDefeat weak obfuscation layer
-
ExecutionModify or replay agent-server messages
-
ImpactInfluence managed endpoint
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Transport encryption
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires three concrete conditions: (1) the Automate Agent must be configured to use HTTP instead of HTTPS for agent-server communications - the 2025.9 patch exists precisely to enforce HTTPS, implying HTTP transport is the vulnerable configuration; (2) the attacker must already hold an on-path/man-in-the-middle network position between agent and server (reflected by AV:A adjacent and AC:H); and (3) the attacker must defeat the weak obfuscation applied to some HTTP-channel communications, which is not true encryption. Limiting factors: no exploitation is possible against agents already using HTTPS, no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no authentication is needed (PR:N), but the mandatory MITM positioning plus HTTP-mode dependency make opportunistic or internet-wide exploitation impractical. |
| Impact | Signals point to a credible-but-conditional risk rather than a drop-everything priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.5) describes an unauthenticated adjacent-network attack of HIGH complexity with full CIA impact - the high complexity reflects that the attacker must both occupy a man-in-the-middle position AND find agents configured for HTTP rather than HTTPS. These prerequisites sharply constrain mass exploitation, which is consistent with the low EPSS score of 0.21% (10th percentile). There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The signals are internally consistent (no conflict between a low EPSS and the absence of KEV/POC). The one point meriting verification: the CVSS marks this AV:A (adjacent) rather than AV:N, yet an on-path attacker's reachability depends on network topology between agent and server - if agent-server traffic traverses untrusted/internet segments, real-world exposure could be broader than 'adjacent' implies; verify the actual network path with the deployment owner. Because ConnectWise Automate is an RMM platform, successful tampering/replay of agent-server traffic is high-consequence (potential control over managed endpoints), so despite the low probability it warrants prompt patching to Automate 2025.9 where HTTP transport is in use. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained a man-in-the-middle position on a network segment carrying ConnectWise Automate agent traffic observes an agent configured to communicate over HTTP instead of HTTPS. Because the channel is cleartext (weakly obfuscated rather than encrypted), the attacker intercepts, modifies, or replays agent-server messages to read sensitive data or inject commands toward the managed endpoint. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so this would require custom tooling and an existing network foothold. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 09, 2026
ConnectWise Automate Agent deployments configured to send agent-server traffic over HTTP rather than HTTPS are exposed to man-in-the-middle interception, modification, and replay of that traffic; the underlying weakness is that the HTTP channel relies on an obfuscation scheme rather than true encryption (CWE-319, cleartext transmission). The flaw affects Automate agent installations running the legacy HTTP transport and is fixed in the 2025.9 release, which enforces HTTPS for all agent communications and updates the obfuscation method. No public exploit code has been identified and there is no CISA KEV listing; EPSS is low at 0.21% (10th percentile), and exploitation demands an on-path network position plus the non-default HTTP configuration, so the risk is credible but conditional rather than opportunistic.
RemediationAI
The primary fix is to upgrade to ConnectWise Automate 2025.9, per the vendor bulletin at https://www.connectwise.com/company/trust/security-bulletins/connectwise-automate-2025.9-security-fix, which enforces HTTPS for all agent communications (vendor-released patch: Automate 2025.9). Where immediate upgrade of every agent is not feasible, the highest-value compensating control is to switch agent-server communications from HTTP to HTTPS manually and firewall-block outbound HTTP (port 80) from managed endpoints to the Automate server, so the vulnerable transport cannot be negotiated; the trade-off is that any legacy agent still requiring the HTTP channel will fail to check in until it is updated or its exceptions are documented and tightly scoped. Additional mitigation is network-side: place Automate agents and their server on trusted, segmented networks with no untrusted on-path devices, and use 802.1X or switch-port security to reduce the MITM opportunity - though this reduces rather than removes exposure for agents still on HTTP, since the weak obfuscation remains defeatable by any positioned attacker. Because exploitation requires an on-path position and the non-default HTTP configuration, the low EPSS (0.21%) and absence of a KEV listing suggest prioritization can follow the 2025.9 upgrade cycle rather than an emergency response, while HTTPS-only configuration should be validated as a standing hardening requirement.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
At its root this is a cleartext-transmission flaw (CWE-319): the Automate Agent can be configured to communicate with its server over HTTP, in which case the payload is protected only by a weak obfuscation layer that does not provide the confidentiality or integrity guarantees of TLS. Because the channel is neither encrypted nor authenticated with a proper cryptographic protocol, an adversary who already occupies an on-path network segment - same broadcast domain, compromised router/switch, rogue Wi-Fi, or a hostile upstream hop - can passively read agent-server traffic, tamper with commands or heartbeat content, or capture and replay messages. The CVSS:3.1 vector AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H reflects that positioning is required (adjacent) and success is difficult (high attack complexity, largely because the weak obfuscation must be defeated), but that when achieved the confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all high and no credentials or user interaction are needed. CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:connectwise:automate:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) indicates the issue is tracked against the Automate product line broadly, with the fix landing in the 2025.9 build rather than being tied to a narrowly enumerated version range.
Know when Connectwise gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
On-path attacker needs no authentication (PR:N) but must hold a MITM position against a non-default HTTP configuration, so AV:A and AC:H; interception plus modify/replay of RMM traffic yields full C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
In the ConnectWise Automate Agent, communications could be configured to use HTTP instead of HTTPS. In such cases, an on-path threat actor with a man-in-the-middle network position could intercept, modify, or replay agent-server traffic. Additionally, the encryption method used to obfuscate some communications over the HTTP channel is updated in the Automate 2025.9 patch to enforce HTTPS for all agent communications.
Executive ViewAI
ConnectWise Automate agent installations that have been left on the legacy HTTP transport - rather than the default HTTPS configuration - can have their agent-to-server traffic intercepted, altered, or replayed by anyone positioned on the network path, because that channel is obfuscated rather than truly encrypted. Because Automate is an RMM platform whose agents hold privileged management capability over managed endpoints, a successful interception could give an attacker a foothold that scales across every machine a compromised agent manages, including customer environments if the deployment is an MSP. Exploitation is conditional - it requires an on-path network position and the non-default HTTP configuration - so this is a credible, targeted risk rather than a broadly opportunistic one, but the potential blast radius justifies immediate verification of transport settings across the fleet.
Vendor-released patch: 2025.9 (per the vendor's fix statement, the underlying weakness is addressed in the 2025.9 release, which enforces HTTPS for all agent communications). Until 2025.9 is deployed enterprise-wide, enforce HTTPS on the agent-server channel, disable or block the legacy HTTP transport, and keep agent-server traffic on trusted, segmented network paths that an on-path attacker cannot reach.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Connectwise
View allPath traversal in ConnectWise ScreenConnect 23.9.7 and earlier enables attackers with administrative privileges to write
Unauthorized file transfer and execution in the ConnectWise ScreenConnect client (all versions prior to 26.6.5) lets a p
services/system_io/actionprocessor/System.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery
ConnectWise Control before 22.9.10032 (formerly known as ScreenConnect) fails to validate user-supplied parameters such
services/system_io/actionprocessor/Contact.rails in ConnectWise Manage 2017.5 allows arbitrary client-side JavaScript co
In ConnectWise Control through 22.9.10032 (formerly known as ScreenConnect), after an executable file is signed, additio
An XXE vulnerability exists in ConnectWise Automate before 2021.0.6.132. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner
ConnectWise Automate through 2020.x has insufficient validation on certain authentication paths, allowing authentication
Integrity-check and server-side validation weaknesses in the ConnectWise ScreenConnect server's extension subsystem allo
A cryptographic authentication bypass vulnerability in ConnectWise ScreenConnect allows remote attackers who gain access
Code integrity failure in ConnectWise Automate Agent versions prior to 2026.5 allows adjacent network attackers to subst
The Agent Update System in ConnectWise Automate before 2020.8 allows Privilege Escalation because the _LTUPDATE folder h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB