Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Launch concurrent threads racing Storage operation
  3. Exploit
    Win race-condition timing window
  4. Execution
    Corrupt shared resource state
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated access to the Windows host with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) - this is not remotely reachable (AV:L). Exploitation further depends on reliably winning a race condition in the Windows Storage component's improper synchronization of a shared resource (CWE-362); the HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) reflects that the attacker must repeatedly trigger concurrent operations and hit a narrow, non-deterministic timing window, which limits reliability and makes the attack non-automatable per CISA SSVC. No special non-default configuration is named in the description; the limiting factors are the pre-existing local foothold and the timing-dependent nature of the race.

Impact

This is a locally-exploitable privilege-escalation flaw (CVSS:3.1 base 7.0) in Windows Storage, requiring local access (AV:L), low existing privileges (PR:L), no user interaction (UI:N), but HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) because the attacker must reliably win a race-condition timing window (CWE-362). Technical impact is total (full C/I/A compromise of the host), which aligns with the CVSS C:H/I:H/A:H. However, the exploitation signals point to LOW real-world urgency: there is no EPSS score provided, CISA SSVC explicitly rates Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is identified. The AC:H requirement and non-automatable nature mean reliable weaponization is non-trivial. Net: a genuinely serious flaw if chained by an attacker who already has a foothold, but NOT a drop-everything emergency - prioritize it within normal Patch Tuesday cadence rather than as an actively-exploited emergency. Note one metadata inconsistency: the input Tags include 'Information Disclosure,' whereas the description characterizes this strictly as local privilege elevation - treat the disclosure framing with caution and rely on the EoP description plus the full C:H/I:H/A:H vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged user who already has local code-execution on a Windows host runs a crafted program that repeatedly triggers the Windows Storage operation while racing a concurrent thread to exploit the improper synchronization window. On a successful race win, the attacker corrupts shared state and escalates from a standard user to SYSTEM-level privileges. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) means the attacker may need many attempts to win the race reliably.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Storage component lets an attacker who already holds a foothold on a Windows host with low-level privileges (PR:L) escalate to full system rights by winning a race condition (CWE-362) in the storage subsystem's handling of a shared resource. The attack is entirely local (AV:L), requires no user interaction, and is assessed at CVSS:3.1 base 7.0 with HIGH attack complexity because the timing window is narrow and non-deterministic, which is why CISA's SSVC rates it non-automatable with no observed exploitation; no public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. Because successful escalation grants high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact on the host, unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server builds exposed to multi-user or post-compromise scenarios should be prioritized for the vendor patch.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: install the Microsoft monthly security update that brings each build to or above its fixed level - 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 / Windows Server 2019 (including Server Core), 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.28000.3231 for Windows 11 26H1, 10.0.26300.9711 for Windows 11 26H2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core); confirm the applied build with winver or Get-ComputerInfo and track the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69931. No feature can be disabled to remove this attack surface without breaking storage functionality, so there is no clean workaround; the practical compensating controls are to reduce the number of low-privileged local principals that can reach the storage path (restrict interactive/RDP logon, remove unnecessary local accounts, keep sandboxed and browser processes off privileged workloads) and to treat any host where an untrusted local user runs as already compromised - these reduce the chance of exploitation but do not eliminate the underlying race, and they add operational friction for legitimate users. Note the fix requires a reboot to load the updated kernel storage components, so schedule it accordingly.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-362, concurrent execution using a shared resource with improper synchronization, inside the Windows Storage stack - the kernel-mode storage path that brokers access to volumes, storage devices and related objects. A race condition in the synchronization of that shared resource allows a low-privileged local caller to interleave operations so that state intended only for a more privileged context is modified or disclosed. Windows is inherently a multi-tenant local environment (multiple interactive sessions, services, sandboxed processes), so any local caller with a standard user token can repeatedly drive the concurrent code path; the constraint is not reachability but reliability, since the attacker must hit an exact interleaving (HIGH complexity, AC:H in CVSS:3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). CWE-362 classically manifests as time-of-check/time-of-use or unsynchronized reference-count/pointer handling, and flaws of this shape in storage drivers are attractive because they can cross the user-to-kernel privilege boundary and defeat application sandboxes or browser/container isolation on the same machine. The affected builds span the Windows 10, Windows 11 (including 26H1/26H2) and Windows Server 2019/2022/2025 (including Server Core) servicing lines, i.e. a single fix was shipped across the whole supported Windows kernel family.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.0 HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.0 HIGH

Local foothold with existing low privileges (AV:L/PR:L); race condition yields high complexity (AC:H); successful win grants full host compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.0

DescriptionCVE.org

Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows Storage component affects Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server. An attacker with an existing low-privileged foothold on a host can exploit a race condition to gain full system rights, potentially leading to complete host compromise and lateral movement within the network. While no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified, the availability of a vendor patch makes immediate remediation critical for organizations with multi-user or post-compromise risk exposure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 90% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows OS component across all supported client and server builds
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

35
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +35
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy