Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged account
  2. Delivery
    Run crafted program against BitLocker
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)
  4. Execution
    Leak sensitive memory contents
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated access to a Windows system as a low-privileged user (PR:L, AV:L) and the ability to execute code locally against the BitLocker component; there is no remote or network-triggerable path. The out-of-bounds read is then abused to leak memory and elevate privileges to SYSTEM. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker must first establish a local foothold with valid credentials, no exploitation has been observed (SSVC Exploitation: none), and the attack is not automatable (SSVC Automatable: no). Affected deployments are those running Windows 10/11 or Windows Server builds below the fixed versions listed in EUVD-2026-99646; applying the vendor patch removes the condition.

Impact

Signals are largely consistent and point to a genuine but non-urgent local privilege-escalation risk. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) describes a low-complexity local attack by an already-authenticated low-privileged user yielding full confidentiality, integrity and availability impact - i.e. elevation to SYSTEM. CISA's SSVC framework corroborates this with Technical Impact: total, but critically rates Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, meaning no observed exploitation and no reliable mass-automation path (consistent with a local-only EoP that needs an existing foothold). There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis'. There is no conflict between the network-vs-local signals: both CVSS (AV:L) and the description ('elevate privileges locally') agree this is local. The main caveat is data provenance - the only reference is the Microsoft MSRC update-guide page (NVD enrichment shows None), so EPSS is not provided and cannot be weighed. Net: a real patch-priority item for endpoint/privilege-hardening programs because of the ubiquitous platform and total technical impact, but not a drop-everything emergency given local-only access, authenticated prerequisite, and no evidence of exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A local attacker who already has a valid low-privileged account on a Windows machine runs a crafted program that triggers an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in the BitLocker component, leveraging the leaked memory to escalate to SYSTEM-level privileges. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), but the attacker must first obtain local code-execution as an authenticated user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Windows BitLocker allows a low-privileged, already-authenticated user on an affected Windows 10, Windows 11, or Windows Server host to exploit an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in the BitLocker component, leaking memory contents and ultimately gaining SYSTEM-level privileges. The attack is purely local (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 7.8) and requires the attacker to first hold a valid foothold with local code execution - there is no remote or network-triggerable path. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, and Microsoft has released vendor patches for all impacted builds.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-88070 as documented in the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-88070), which carries the vendor-released fixes for every affected branch: Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2 should be brought to 10.0.22631.7652, 10.0.26100.9711, 10.0.26200.9711, 10.0.28000.3231, and 10.0.26300.9711 respectively; Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2 to 10.0.14393.9612, 10.0.17763.9376, and 10.0.19044.7807; and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 to 6.2.9200.26434, 6.3.9600.23470, 10.0.14393.9612, 10.0.17763.9376, 10.0.20348.5761, and 10.0.26100.33650, including on Server Core installations. Because exploitation requires an existing local low-privileged foothold and is not automatable (SSVC Automatable: no, Exploitation: none), patching can follow a normal risk-based cycle rather than emergency change control, but where patching must be deferred the effective compensating controls are to minimise local attack surface rather than to disable BitLocker itself: enforce least privilege and application control (WDAC/AppLocker or Smart App Control) so untrusted local code cannot reach the component, and restrict interactive and secondary logon rights on sensitive servers, accepting the operational cost of tighter admin workflows. Unlocking or suspending BitLocker protection is not recommended as a mitigation - it removes drive-encryption coverage for lost or stolen devices and does not block the vulnerable code path, so the trade-off is a net security loss; likewise, network controls such as blocking BitLocker-related ports or disabling the management WMI providers offer little benefit here since the issue is not network-triggerable and disabling the providers breaks enterprise key-escrow, recovery-password retrieval, and compliance reporting.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is a CWE-125 out-of-bounds read inside Windows BitLocker, Microsoft's full-volume encryption subsystem that sits across kernel-mode drivers and user-facing management surfaces (WMI/COM providers, manage-bde, and the BitLocker control panel). Reading past the end of a buffer in a privileged context typically discloses adjacent kernel or process memory, which an attacker can use to defeat ASLR/KASLR, recover pointer or token structures, and convert an information leak into a reliable local privilege escalation to SYSTEM. Because the vulnerable surface is reachable only through local execution against the BitLocker component, the prerequisite is an existing low-privileged session (PR:L) with the ability to run code on the host (AV:L); the CVSS vector shows no user interaction (UI:N) and scope unchanged (S:U), while the confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all High. The affected component is shipped in-box with Windows, so every unpatched Windows client and server build below the fixed revision levels from EUVD-2026-99646 carries the flaw - including the Server Core installation variants that exclude the desktop experience but still ship the BitLocker stack. This places the issue in the classic 'post-compromise escalation' class rather than an initial-access vector, and the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating reflects that successful escalation yields full control of the host.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L/PR:L) triggers an easy out-of-bounds read with no user interaction; successful elevation to SYSTEM grants full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:21 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows BitLocker allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows BitLocker, the built-in disk encryption feature in Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server, is affected by a high-severity local privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-88070) that allows an authenticated attacker with existing local code execution to gain SYSTEM-level privileges. This could enable an attacker to bypass BitLocker protections, access encrypted data, and move laterally across the organization, making it a serious risk for any environment relying on BitLocker for data-at-rest security. Leadership should prioritize remediation because a single compromised endpoint could lead to full system compromise and potential data breach.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
BitLocker ships in Windows 10/11 and Windows Server, deployed almost everywhere
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy