Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessDeliver malicious image/document to target
-
DeliveryUser opens or previews file
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write in Windows GDI
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code as current user
-
ImpactCompromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to open or render an attacker-crafted file processed by Windows GDI (the vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:N but UI:R), so the mandatory limiting factor is user interaction - there is no zero-click or fully automated path, which is consistent with SSVC Automatable=no. No authentication or elevated privileges are needed on the attacker side (PR:N), and the scope is unchanged (S:U), meaning code runs in the context of the interacting user rather than automatically at SYSTEM. Affected deployments are Windows 10 (1607/1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2), and Windows Server 2012 R2/2016/2019/2022/2025 below the fixed build numbers listed by EUVD; systems patched to or above those builds are not exploitable. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority patch item, though not an emergency at the time of analysis. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated memory-corruption flaw with total impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability - consistent with CWE-787 out-of-bounds write enabling code execution. The one factor that meaningfully tempers raw severity is UI:R: successful exploitation requires a user to interact (typically opening or rendering a malicious file/image), so this is not a wormable, zero-click issue. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured posture: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation or public PoC), Automatable=no (consistent with the user-interaction requirement defeating mass automation), but Technical Impact=total (matching the C:H/I:H/A:H full-system compromise potential). No EPSS score was provided, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. There is NO CISA KEV listing and NO public exploit identified. Signals are therefore internally consistent - high technical impact paired with a real interaction barrier and no evidence of in-the-wild use - pointing to 'patch promptly as part of normal cycle' rather than 'drop everything.' Given that Windows GDI is a historically favored and heavily weaponized attack surface, the window between patch and real-world exploit development is often short, so prompt remediation is warranted. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious image or document that, when rendered by a vulnerable Windows GDI component, triggers an out-of-bounds write. The attacker delivers it via email, a web page, a chat message, or a file share and socially engineers the target into opening or previewing it, achieving code execution in the context of the user. No public exploit or PoC has been identified at time of analysis, and the required user interaction (UI:R) raises the practical bar for mass exploitation. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Remote code execution in the Windows GDI (Graphics Device Interface) component affects unpatched Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2) and Windows Server 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025, where an attacker who convinces a user to open or render a crafted file triggers an out-of-bounds write that can execute code in that user's security context. The flaw is network-reachable with no privileges or credentials required on the attacker side, but successful exploitation is gated by user interaction, so there is no zero-click or automatable path; consistent with the CISA SSVC assessment (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no), no public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis. Microsoft has published vendor patches, and this should be treated as a genuine high-priority patch item rather than an emergency at the time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft's update raises each affected edition to the fixed build listed by EUVD, so apply the corresponding security update to reach at least 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (Windows 11 23H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (Windows 11 24H2), 10.0.26200.9711 (Windows 11 25H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025 and Server Core), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022) and 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2 and Server Core); the authoritative KB mapping is in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83929, and Windows Server 2012 R2 is out of mainstream support, so confirm extended-support eligibility before assuming that patch path applies. Because exploitation requires the victim to open or render attacker-supplied content (UI:R, with SSVC Automatable=no), the practical compensating controls are to block untrusted GDI-processed files at the perimeter (strip or quarantine image/metafile attachments such as EMF/WMF and unusual raster types, and have the mail/web gateway re-encode or convert images rather than pass them through), to enforce Mark-of-the-Web and Protected View / Attachment Manager so files opened from email or download render in a sandboxed viewer instead of the full GDI path, and to apply WDAC/AppLocker and Attack Surface Reduction rules that block Office and script hosts from spawning child processes - each of these reduces exposure but none removes the underlying memory-safety bug, and content-conversion filters carry a fidelity/functionality trade-off for legitimate graphics workflows. Until patching is complete, prioritize internet-facing and multi-user endpoints (RDP session hosts, VDI, shared workstations) and any system where untrusted documents are routinely rendered, since a successful trigger executes with the rights of the interacting user. No vendor-released patch is missing here, but if a specific build cannot be updated, the residual mitigation is to restrict which applications and users can process untrusted graphics content rather than relying on network filtering of the AV:N vector alone.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 18 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in Windows GDI, the legacy graphics subsystem responsible for raster operations, device contexts, fonts and image/metafile rendering on behalf of applications. Root-cause class CWE-787 means a length, offset or index derived from attacker-controlled graphics data is not validated before a memory write, so a malformed object processed by GDI's parsing/rendering path can overwrite adjacent heap or buffer memory and corrupt control data, which under the assessed vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) yields code execution rather than a simple crash. Because the scope is unchanged (S:U), any code that does execute runs with the privileges of the user who opened or rendered the file, not automatically at SYSTEM, which limits the immediate severity of a single successful trigger but makes it a viable first step in a client-side chain. The network attack vector reflects delivery (email attachment, downloaded document, web-hosted image, or a file opened from a share) while the UI:R prerequisite reflects that a victim must actually open or render the content for the corrupted buffer to be reached; EUVD's build-level version ranges for Windows 10/11 and Server releases are the practical version identifiers here, as no CPE strings were supplied.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-delivered malicious file parsed by GDI gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N, but victim must open it (UI:R); out-of-bounds write yields full code execution in user context, so C/I/A:H and S:U.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds write in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity remote code execution flaw in the Windows Graphics Device Interface (CVE-2026-83929) affects the vast majority of the organization's Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server estate, allowing code to run with the privileges of any user who opens a malicious file. Because exploitation requires a user to open or render a crafted document, the practical exposure is driven by user behavior rather than by automated scanning, but the breadth of affected endpoints and servers makes this a material priority for the patching program. Leadership should care because a single successful attack against an unpatched workstation or server could yield code execution in a trusted user context, creating a foothold for lateral movement and data compromise.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99444
GHSA-6xr6-87vg-9v9h
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB