Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious image file
-
DeliveryDeliver via email or web to user
-
ExploitUser opens file in Microsoft Paint
-
ExecutionTrigger out-of-bounds read / memory corruption
-
ImpactExecute code in user context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a victim to open a maliciously crafted image file in Microsoft Paint on a vulnerable build (Paint 11.0.0.0 through versions earlier than 11.2605.91.0); this user-opens-a-file step is the primary limiting factor despite the supplied vector's UI:N rating, since Paint exposes no network service. The high attack complexity (CVSS AC:H) is a further limiter - converting an out-of-bounds read into code execution typically demands precise memory layout/heap grooming and may be build- or data-dependent. No authentication or special privileges are needed on the target (PR:N), and no non-default configuration is required beyond having a vulnerable Paint version installed. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-to-high severity client-side flaw (CVSS 8.1) rather than an urgent emergency, and the signals are notably mixed. The CVSS vector claims AV:N/PR:N/UI:N - remote, unauthenticated, no user interaction - but the affected product (Microsoft Paint) is a desktop image-editing application with no network-listening service, so realistic exploitation almost certainly requires a victim to open a crafted image file; the UI:N rating should be treated skeptically and verified against the Microsoft advisory. AC:H already signals that reliable exploitation is difficult. Exploitation-probability signals are reassuring: there is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified, and CISA's SSVC framework rates Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (consistent with a flaw that needs user interaction and complex memory manipulation), while rating Technical Impact as 'total.' There is also an internal inconsistency worth flagging: CWE-125 (out-of-bounds read) and the 'Information Disclosure' tag point to a memory-disclosure primitive, yet the description and CVSS (C:H/I:H/A:H) assert full code execution - an OOB read alone rarely yields RCE, so this likely chains with other conditions or the description over-states impact. Net: patch on a normal cadence; this is not drop-everything, but the 'total' technical impact and ubiquitous product footprint justify not deferring it indefinitely. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malformed image file (e.g. a BMP/JPEG/PNG) that triggers an out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Paint's parsing logic and delivers it to a victim via email, a web download, or a shared drive. When the victim opens the file in a vulnerable Paint build (11.0.0.0 up to 11.2605.91.0), the memory-corruption condition is triggered, potentially leading to code execution in the user's context. No public proof-of-concept exploit has been identified, and the high attack complexity (AC:H) means weaponization is non-trivial. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Paint 11.x allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a target system when the victim opens a specially crafted image file in the vulnerable app. The attack is delivered over a network (e.g., via a downloaded or emailed image), but Paint exposes no network service, so the practical prerequisite is user interaction - opening the file - which, together with the high attack complexity required to turn a memory read into reliable code execution, makes this a moderate-to-high severity client-side issue rather than an urgent emergency. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis (CISA SSVC reports Exploitation: none, and the flaw is not on CISA KEV), and Microsoft has released a patched version, Paint 11.2605.91.0, so remediation should focus on updating Paint on endpoints that routinely handle images from untrusted sources.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft Paint 11.2605.91.0 or later, distributed through the Microsoft Store update channel (and surfaced via Windows Update on managed devices); apply it per the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83844. Until every endpoint is updated, treat images from untrusted sources as executable content and do not open downloaded or emailed image attachments directly in Paint. For high-risk workstations - especially those whose users routinely preview unknown images - consider using AppLocker or WDAC to block the Microsoft Paint package (Microsoft.Paint / mspaint) or removing/denying-installing the Store app via Intune; the trade-off is that users lose the default image editor and may fall back to unpatched third-party viewers, so those alternates must be kept current. Network perimeter controls are of limited value here because the payload arrives as a file rather than as a service request, and no vendor workaround preserves full Paint functionality. Patching can generally be scheduled in a normal maintenance cycle given the absence of a public exploit and no KEV listing, but prioritize systems exposed to user-supplied image content.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-125, an out-of-bounds read, occurring inside Microsoft Paint's image parsing/decoding path (the Windows inbox/Store Paint app, product string 'Microsoft Paint', UWP package version family 11.0.0.0 through versions earlier than 11.2605.91.0). An out-of-bounds read means the parser computes an index, length, or offset derived from attacker-controlled image data and then accesses memory beyond the bounds of the allocated buffer; depending on the surrounding code, the leaked memory can disclose heap contents (information disclosure, reflected by the 'Information Disclosure' tag) or be used as a stepping stone toward code execution if the read result influences a pointer or control-flow-relevant value. Converting a read primitive into full code execution (C/H/I all High) is non-trivial and explains the high attack complexity (CVSS AC:H): it typically requires precise heap grooming and may be build- or data-dependent, which is why the supplied NVD vector and our independent assessment differ on user interaction. The NVD vector lists AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, while our assessed vector corrects the interaction component to UI:R (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) because Paint exposes no network listener - delivery is network-borne but exploitation requires the victim to open the malicious image. Note that CISA's SSVC assessment rates the flaw as not automatable and not currently exploited.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Paint is a client app with no network service, so a crafted file must be opened by a user (UI:R), and OOB-read-to-RCE requires complex memory manipulation (AC:H); no privileges needed (PR:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Paint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99382
GHSA-2h2h-j632-qrgj
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB