Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain Bluetooth adjacency to target
-
DeliverySend crafted Bluetooth packets
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds read in port driver
-
ExecutionLure required user interaction
-
ImpactExecute code in driver context
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to be on an adjacent network - specifically within Bluetooth radio range of the target (AV:A) - and the target must have Bluetooth enabled and in use. No authentication is needed (PR:N), but the attack is gated by required user interaction (UI:R), such as the victim accepting or initiating a Bluetooth connection, and by high attack complexity (AC:H), implying the attacker must satisfy conditions outside their control (e.g., winning a timing/memory-layout race). These factors - physical proximity, Bluetooth being active, user action, and the complex preconditions - are the primary limits that reduce real-world risk below the raw 7.1 score; hosts with Bluetooth disabled are not exposed. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, not top-tier, priority. The CVSS 3.1 base vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 7.1 HIGH) describes an adjacent-network (Bluetooth) issue that, while unauthenticated (PR:N), is constrained by high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R) - three real barriers that keep this well below a wormable remote-code-execution profile. The defensive signals agree: SSVC reports Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=total, so the 'total' impact is offset by the fact that it cannot be scaled or automated. No EPSS score was provided in the input, and there is no CISA KEV listing and no public proof-of-concept, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The combination of adjacency, high complexity, user interaction, and no observed exploitation makes this a patch-on-normal-cycle item for most environments rather than an emergency, despite the 'total' technical impact. Note one tension to verify: the description says 'execute code' (implying code execution) while the root weakness is an out-of-bounds read (CWE-20), which typically yields information disclosure or a crash - the C:H/I:H/A:H rating implies the read is leveraged into fuller compromise; confirm the exact impact against the Microsoft MSRC advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker within Bluetooth range of a target (e.g., in a shared office, airport, or conference setting) sends specially crafted Bluetooth traffic to a Windows host with Bluetooth enabled, triggering an out-of-bounds read in the Bluetooth Port Driver. Because user interaction is required and attack complexity is high, the attacker must win a race or coax the user into an action (such as accepting/initiating a Bluetooth connection) for reliable exploitation. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so this remains a theoretical chain pending a working PoC. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Memory-safety failure in the Windows Bluetooth Port Driver lets a device within Bluetooth radio range trigger out-of-bounds memory access that can escalate to code execution on unpatched Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server hosts with an active Bluetooth radio. Exploitation requires proximity (adjacent network), the victim's Bluetooth to be enabled and in use, some form of user interaction such as accepting or initiating a Bluetooth connection, and high attack complexity reflecting preconditions outside the attacker's control; authentication is not required (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Microsoft has shipped fixes, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as "none" with the attack assessed as non-automatable, and hosts with Bluetooth disabled are not exposed - making this a moderate rather than top-tier priority despite the 7.1 score and the CVSS "total" technical impact rating on affected devices.
RemediationAI
Primary fix: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70126 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70126), which raises affected builds to Windows 10 1607 / Server 2016 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 / Server 2019 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2 10.0.19044.7807 and 22H2 10.0.19045.7807, Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 / Server 2025 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650, Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 10.0.26300.9711, and Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23470. Because the attack surface is Bluetooth itself, hosts that do not need Bluetooth can eliminate exposure entirely by turning the radio off or disabling the Bluetooth adapter and its supporting services via Device Manager, Group Policy, or firmware-level radio disablement - the trade-off is loss of Bluetooth peripherals, headsets, and tethering on those machines, and it must be weighed on laptops and kiosks where Bluetooth input devices are in use. Where Bluetooth must remain enabled, the residual risk controls are organizational rather than technical: this vector requires radio proximity plus user interaction, so avoiding pairing or accepting connections from unknown devices in public spaces, disabling Bluetooth discoverability, and removing stale paired-device entries reduce practical exposure, though none of these is a substitute for patching. No vendor-documented registry or driver-level workaround exists in the available data beyond disabling the radio, and there is no vendor-released patch alternative other than the monthly cumulative update channel.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 18 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability sits in the Windows Bluetooth Port Driver, the kernel-mode component that handles Bluetooth radio/port traffic on Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server. The assigned CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) describes the root-cause class: the driver does not adequately validate data received over a Bluetooth connection, which the description characterizes as an out-of-bounds read, while the associated intelligence tags label it a buffer overflow - both point to a memory-safety defect reachable from the Bluetooth protocol path. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is significant in three ways: AV:A confines the attacker to an adjacent network (for this driver, effectively Bluetooth radio range), PR:N means no credentials are needed, while UI:R and AC:H mean the victim must take an action and the attacker must additionally satisfy timing or memory-layout conditions that are not fully under their control. Score impact is total on the targeted endpoint (C:H/I:H/A:H) but is scoped Unchanged, so a successful exploit affects the local system rather than crossing a security boundary. The affected build set spans Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 (including Server Core installations), consistent with a shared Bluetooth stack component across the servicing branches. The advisory is tracked as EUVD-2026-99174 and reported by secure@microsoft.com.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Bluetooth adjacency gives AV:A; preconditions outside attacker control give AC:H; no auth is PR:N but victim action makes UI:R; driver code execution yields C:H/I:H/A:H with no scope change.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Bluetooth Port Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over an adjacent network.
Executive ViewAI
A memory-safety flaw in the Windows Bluetooth Port Driver exposes the organization's Bluetooth-enabled Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server estate to code execution by an attacker who is physically within radio range. Microsoft has shipped fixes, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and devices with Bluetooth disabled are not exposed, so this is a manageable patch-driven exposure rather than an emergency. Leadership should care because unpatched laptops, kiosks, and conference-room systems in shared or publicly accessible spaces remain reachable by anyone nearby who can induce a Bluetooth connection.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99174
GHSA-6x35-vhpc-5v9m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB