Skip to main content

Windows Portable Devices EUVDEUVD-2026-99172

| CVE-2026-70132 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-4c6g-6pr9-mgpp
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious input to device driver
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt kernel heap, execute code as SYSTEM
  5. Impact
    Full host compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated, low-privileged local code execution on the target Windows host (PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or unauthenticated path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once a foothold exists, triggering the heap overflow in the Portable Device File System Driver is straightforward and works against default configurations of all affected Windows builds. The principal limiting factor is the prerequisite local foothold: this is a second-stage privilege-escalation primitive, not an initial-access vector, which bounds real-world risk to hosts where an attacker can already run code.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-level priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a classic local privilege-escalation chain: an attacker who already has low-privileged, authenticated code execution on the host can corrupt the heap in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver to gain SYSTEM-level control, with total impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CISA SSVC framework corroborates this: Technical Impact is 'total,' but Exploitation is 'none' (no observed in-the-wild activity) and Automatable is 'no' (consistent with a local-only, post-access EoP that cannot be sprayed across the internet). There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC identified, and no EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation-probability signals are absent rather than low. The signals are mutually consistent - there is no conflict between the local attack vector and the description, which also explicitly states local privilege elevation. The main caveat is that EPSS data is missing from the input, so a numeric exploitation-likelihood cross-check cannot be performed; prioritize patching because this is a near-ubiquitous Windows kernel-mode driver, not because of any evidence of active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already obtained low-privileged access to a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a compromised standard user account, or a chained initial-access bug) invokes the Portable Device File System Driver with crafted input that overflows a heap allocation. Successful corruption of kernel heap structures lets them execute code at SYSTEM, fully compromising the machine. No public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis, and the local-only vector with low attack complexity means exploitation is feasible but requires prior foothold rather than remote reach.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver lets an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a Windows host trigger a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) and elevate to SYSTEM. The flaw spans an unusually wide set of builds - Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations - and carries a vendor CVSS of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Microsoft has released fixes, CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; the operative constraint is the required local foothold, which makes this a second-stage escalation primitive rather than an entry point.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has shipped fixes for this vulnerability and the remediation path is straightforward - apply the current cumulative security update for each affected build so it meets or exceeds the EUVD-listed thresholds: 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26200.9711 (25H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (24H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (23H2), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019/Server Core), 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016/Server Core), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025/Server Core), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2/Server Core), and 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012/Server Core); verify exact package and update identifiers against https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70132 before deployment, and note that Windows 10 22H2 and Server 2012/2012 R2 fixes depend on active ESU coverage. Because exploitation requires an existing authenticated low-privilege local foothold (AV:L/PR:L), the highest-value compensating controls are those that shrink the population of users who can execute code on the host at all: restrict interactive logon, RDP, and remote-management access to the minimum necessary accounts, remove unnecessary local administrative or developer tooling from endpoints, and enforce application control so that a low-privileged code-execution bug cannot chain into this driver. If the WPD/portable-device functionality is genuinely unused - common on hardened servers - disabling or blocking the portable device driver stack removes the attack surface entirely, at the cost of breaking MTP/WPD device access such as connecting phones, cameras, and media players to the host; test this on a representative image first, since driver removal can affect device enumeration and any application that depends on the WPD APIs. Note that CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', so there is no evidence of active exploitation driving emergency out-of-band action; the patch can be scheduled into the normal monthly cadence, with network segmentation and least-privilege enforcement used to bound exposure in the interim.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Portable Device (WPD) stack is the driver layer that presents MTP/WPD-class peripherals - smartphones, cameras, media players, and similar portable devices - to Windows as a browsable file system, and the Portable Device File System Driver handles the parsing and buffering of data arriving from those devices or from WPD API callers. The root-cause class is CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow: a length or size value supplied to the driver is not validated against the destination heap buffer's capacity, so an oversized write can corrupt adjacent heap metadata and, in a low-privilege local context, be shaped into controlled memory corruption. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is explicit that this is a local (AV:L), low-privileged (PR:L), unauthenticated-to-the-component (UI:N) attack with low complexity and no scope change, yielding high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - i.e., a kernel/driver-level escalation reachable once any user-mode code runs on the target. Because the CVSS scope is unchanged and the vulnerability is a memory-safety defect in a system driver, successful exploitation is bounded by the attacker's existing foothold rather than by any network-reachable preconditions; there is no remote or unauthenticated path described in the available data.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local authorized attacker with low privileges (AV:L/PR:L) exploits a driver heap overflow needing no user interaction (UI:N), yielding SYSTEM-level control with total CIA impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Portable Device File System Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

CVE-2026-70132 is a local privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver that allows an attacker who already has a foothold on a host to elevate to SYSTEM-level control across nearly the entire supported Windows estate, spanning Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025. Because exploitation requires an authenticated local presence, the immediate organizational risk is to environments that are already partially compromised, where this flaw can convert a limited beachhead into full system control and deeper lateral movement. Leadership should prioritize remediation given the unusually broad set of affected builds and the potential to amplify the severity of any existing intrusion.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 72% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core kernel-mode driver shipped in all supported Windows editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy