Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local access
-
DeliveryCraft malicious input to device driver
-
ExploitTrigger heap-based buffer overflow
-
ExecutionCorrupt kernel heap, execute code as SYSTEM
-
ImpactFull host compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated, low-privileged local code execution on the target Windows host (PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or unauthenticated path. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once a foothold exists, triggering the heap overflow in the Portable Device File System Driver is straightforward and works against default configurations of all affected Windows builds. The principal limiting factor is the prerequisite local foothold: this is a second-stage privilege-escalation primitive, not an initial-access vector, which bounds real-world risk to hosts where an attacker can already run code. |
| Impact | This is a credible but not emergency-level priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) describes a classic local privilege-escalation chain: an attacker who already has low-privileged, authenticated code execution on the host can corrupt the heap in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver to gain SYSTEM-level control, with total impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The CISA SSVC framework corroborates this: Technical Impact is 'total,' but Exploitation is 'none' (no observed in-the-wild activity) and Automatable is 'no' (consistent with a local-only, post-access EoP that cannot be sprayed across the internet). There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC identified, and no EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation-probability signals are absent rather than low. The signals are mutually consistent - there is no conflict between the local attack vector and the description, which also explicitly states local privilege elevation. The main caveat is that EPSS data is missing from the input, so a numeric exploitation-likelihood cross-check cannot be performed; prioritize patching because this is a near-ubiquitous Windows kernel-mode driver, not because of any evidence of active exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained low-privileged access to a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a compromised standard user account, or a chained initial-access bug) invokes the Portable Device File System Driver with crafted input that overflows a heap allocation. Successful corruption of kernel heap structures lets them execute code at SYSTEM, fully compromising the machine. No public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis, and the local-only vector with low attack complexity means exploitation is feasible but requires prior foothold rather than remote reach. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver lets an authenticated, low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a Windows host trigger a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) and elevate to SYSTEM. The flaw spans an unusually wide set of builds - Windows 10 (1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations - and carries a vendor CVSS of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Microsoft has released fixes, CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; the operative constraint is the required local foothold, which makes this a second-stage escalation primitive rather than an entry point.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has shipped fixes for this vulnerability and the remediation path is straightforward - apply the current cumulative security update for each affected build so it meets or exceeds the EUVD-listed thresholds: 10.0.26300.9711 (Windows 11 26H2), 10.0.28000.3231 (Windows 11 26H1), 10.0.26200.9711 (25H2), 10.0.26100.9711 (24H2), 10.0.22631.7652 (23H2), 10.0.19044.7807 (Windows 10 21H2/22H2), 10.0.17763.9376 (Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019/Server Core), 10.0.14393.9612 (Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016/Server Core), 10.0.26100.33650 (Server 2025/Server Core), 10.0.20348.5761 (Server 2022), 6.3.9600.23470 (Server 2012 R2/Server Core), and 6.2.9200.26434 (Server 2012/Server Core); verify exact package and update identifiers against https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70132 before deployment, and note that Windows 10 22H2 and Server 2012/2012 R2 fixes depend on active ESU coverage. Because exploitation requires an existing authenticated low-privilege local foothold (AV:L/PR:L), the highest-value compensating controls are those that shrink the population of users who can execute code on the host at all: restrict interactive logon, RDP, and remote-management access to the minimum necessary accounts, remove unnecessary local administrative or developer tooling from endpoints, and enforce application control so that a low-privileged code-execution bug cannot chain into this driver. If the WPD/portable-device functionality is genuinely unused - common on hardened servers - disabling or blocking the portable device driver stack removes the attack surface entirely, at the cost of breaking MTP/WPD device access such as connecting phones, cameras, and media players to the host; test this on a representative image first, since driver removal can affect device enumeration and any application that depends on the WPD APIs. Note that CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no', so there is no evidence of active exploitation driving emergency out-of-band action; the patch can be scheduled into the normal monthly cadence, with network segmentation and least-privilege enforcement used to bound exposure in the interim.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Windows Portable Device (WPD) stack is the driver layer that presents MTP/WPD-class peripherals - smartphones, cameras, media players, and similar portable devices - to Windows as a browsable file system, and the Portable Device File System Driver handles the parsing and buffering of data arriving from those devices or from WPD API callers. The root-cause class is CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow: a length or size value supplied to the driver is not validated against the destination heap buffer's capacity, so an oversized write can corrupt adjacent heap metadata and, in a low-privilege local context, be shaped into controlled memory corruption. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is explicit that this is a local (AV:L), low-privileged (PR:L), unauthenticated-to-the-component (UI:N) attack with low complexity and no scope change, yielding high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - i.e., a kernel/driver-level escalation reachable once any user-mode code runs on the target. Because the CVSS scope is unchanged and the vulnerability is a memory-safety defect in a system driver, successful exploitation is bounded by the attacker's existing foothold rather than by any network-reachable preconditions; there is no remote or unauthenticated path described in the available data.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local authorized attacker with low privileges (AV:L/PR:L) exploits a driver heap overflow needing no user interaction (UI:N), yielding SYSTEM-level control with total CIA impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Portable Device File System Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-70132 is a local privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows Portable Device File System Driver that allows an attacker who already has a foothold on a host to elevate to SYSTEM-level control across nearly the entire supported Windows estate, spanning Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025. Because exploitation requires an authenticated local presence, the immediate organizational risk is to environments that are already partially compromised, where this flaw can convert a limited beachhead into full system control and deeper lateral movement. Leadership should prioritize remediation given the unusually broad set of affected builds and the potential to amplify the severity of any existing intrusion.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99172
GHSA-4c6g-6pr9-mgpp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB