Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to malicious web page
-
ExploitTrigger unspecified Chrome flaw
-
ImpactUndetermined impact on browser
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Workflow enforcement
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Cannot be determined from available data - the CVE has no description, CVSS vector, or CWE. As a Google Chrome desktop stable-channel fix, exploitation most commonly requires the victim to browse attacker-influenced web content with a vulnerable, unpatched Chrome desktop build, but the exact prerequisite feature, protocol, or configuration is not specified in the provided intelligence. Consult the linked Chrome Releases advisory and the Ubuntu security notice for the concrete conditions. |
| Impact | Risk cannot be quantitatively assessed from the provided data: no description, no CVSS score/vector, and no CWE are supplied, so attack vector, complexity, privilege, and impact are all unknown. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC referenced - exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The single reference is Google's Chrome Releases 'Stable Channel Update for Desktop' blog (Sep-2026), which confirms this is a Google Chrome desktop stable-channel fix carried downstream by Ubuntu, and a patch is available. The dominant risk driver here is prevalence, not signal severity: Chrome is deployed near-universally, so even an unrated flaw warrants prompt patching per normal browser-update hygiene. However, with no severity metadata to distinguish a low-severity hardening fix from a high-severity memory-corruption or sandbox-escape bug, this cannot be triaged as a confirmed priority - it should be treated as 'patch on the standard browser cadence' rather than emergency response. Missing data (description, CVSS, CWE) should be resolved by consulting the Chrome release notes and the Ubuntu security advisory before any exception is granted. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A specific exploit scenario cannot be constructed because the vulnerability description, class, and CVSS vector are all absent. Based only on it being a Chrome desktop stable-channel fix, a plausible-but-unconfirmed pattern for such fixes is a user browsing to attacker-controlled web content that triggers a flaw in the renderer or a browser component; the concrete mechanism is unknown. No public exploit code is referenced. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 24, 2026
Google Chrome desktop stable-channel installs are covered by a vendor fix for CVE-2026-95370 published in Google's Stable Channel Update for Desktop, but the supplied intelligence contains no description, CVSS score, vector, or CWE, so the concrete impact and attack path cannot be characterized here. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the CVE is not listed as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV), though exploitability cannot be ruled out given the absence of technical detail. Ubuntu is the reporting vendor, so Chromium packages on that distribution built from the same upstream fix should be treated as in scope alongside Chrome on Ubuntu systems.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: Google published a fix in the Stable Channel Update for Desktop referenced at http://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0856730748.html, and that advisory is the place to read the exact fixed build, since the specific version number is not contained in this dataset and must not be assumed. Ubuntu users should apply the matching package update from the Ubuntu security team (the reporting vendor) once the notice for this CVE is available, and fully restart the browser afterward so the patched binary is loaded rather than a cached one. If immediate patching is not possible, the workable compensating controls are to enforce Chrome's automatic update policy through enterprise policy so stale unmanaged builds are not left running, and to route high-risk browsing through a remote browser-isolation or virtualized environment until the fixed build is deployed; both reduce exposure but neither removes the vulnerability from an unpatched local installation, and update-enforcement policies can break workflows that depend on pinned or legacy browser versions. No vendor-published workaround specific to the affected component is identifiable from the provided data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
No CWE is supplied, so the root-cause class cannot be stated and this analysis does not assign one. The only structural facts available are that the issue is a Google Chrome desktop stable-channel fix documented on the Chrome Releases blog and that it is tracked by the Ubuntu security team as the reporting vendor. Chrome's security architecture centers on a multi-process model with a renderer sandbox, site isolation, and separate GPU and network service processes, and stable-channel fixes of this form typically land in one of those components or in the browser's media/network stack, but without a CWE, component identifier, or CPE string naming exact affected builds, the specific library, protocol, or attack surface is unverified. The linked advisory should be treated as the authoritative source for the affected component and version range rather than inferring one from this dataset.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Medium–Critical)AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: vendor:ubuntu
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
[Unknown description]
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Same technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Tumbleweed | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-89118
GHSA-33q3-82m7-96mm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB