Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach HPLIP service or local process
  2. Delivery
    Deliver crafted print/scan/discovery input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap and hijack control flow
  5. Impact
    Execute code / escalate to root

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target host to have HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing software) installed and the relevant vulnerable component active - typically a Linux system configured for HP printing/scanning. Because this is a bundled advisory, prerequisites differ per flaw: the RCE path implies reaching a network-facing or input-processing HPLIP component, while the privilege-escalation and unauthorized-file-modification issues most likely require prior local access to the host. Limiting factors: the product is only present on Linux systems with HPLIP deployed (not a universal service), heap-overflow exploitation demands reliable memory grooming, and the true attack vector for several sub-issues is probably local rather than remote despite the aggregate AV:N vector.

Impact

This is an aggregate HP advisory (hpsbpi04151) bundling MULTIPLE externally reported HPLIP vulnerabilities under one CVE, so the single CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) represents the worst-case component rather than any one flaw - a key interpretive caveat. The vendor vector claims remote, unauthenticated, network-reachable code execution with high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact, which if literal is a genuine top priority. However, HPLIP is a Linux printing/imaging driver stack whose components are frequently local-only (root/SUID daemons, CUPS backends), so the blanket AV:N is questionable for at least some of the bundled issues (privilege escalation and 'unauthorized file modification' read as local vectors) - verify per-component scope with HP. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided data, meaning no evidence of active exploitation; this reads as a proactively patched vendor batch rather than an in-the-wild threat. Net: treat as high-priority patching for Linux fleets running HP printers, but the '9.3 remote RCE' framing likely overstates the realistic reachability of the privesc/file-modification subset.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker reachable to a Linux host running HPLIP sends crafted input to a vulnerable HPLIP component (e.g., a print/scan data path or discovery service), triggering the CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow to corrupt memory and execute code, or leverages a local privilege-escalation flaw in a root-privileged HPLIP daemon. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation of the heap overflow realistically requires precise heap grooming.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow and related memory-safety flaws in HP Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) can allow remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification on Linux hosts where HPLIP is installed and the affected component is active. This is an aggregate HP bulletin (hpsbpi04151) that bundles multiple externally reported issues under one CVE, so the published CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) represents the worst-case component rather than any single flaw, and the assessed CVSS 3.1 score is lower (AV:N/AC:H) because several sub-issues are more likely local than remote and heap exploitation requires reliable memory grooming. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and the exposure is limited to Linux systems on which HPLIP is deployed rather than being a universal service.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to install the updated HPLIP release referenced in HP security bulletin hpsbpi04151 (https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15646959-15646984-16/hpsbpi04151); HP states the issues are remediated, so patched HPLIP packages should be applied through the distribution's package manager or HP's released update, with the exact fixed version taken from that bulletin rather than assumed - patch status is therefore 'Patch available per vendor advisory' with no exact fix version independently confirmed in the provided data. Where immediate upgrading is not possible, reduce exposure by disabling or removing unused HPLIP components: stop the HPLIP discovery and device daemons (for example hpiod/hpssd-style services) and uninstall HPLIP from systems that do not need HP printing/scanning, at the cost of losing those functions; restrict network access to the printing stack by blocking CUPS/IPP port 631 and HPLIP discovery traffic at the host firewall, accepting that legitimate remote printing from other subnets will break; and limit local users who can submit jobs or invoke HPLIP utilities, though this does not mitigate the network-facing RCE path. None of these are substitutes for the vendor fix, and any hardening must be validated against the specific components named in hpsbpi04151 since this CVE aggregates several distinct flaws with different prerequisites.

Affected VersionsENISA

HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) 0 <3.26.6

Affected Packages

euvd hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_hplip fix: 3.26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HPLIP is HP's open-source Linux driver and utility stack for HP printers and scanners, comprising a CUPS backend, the hpiod/hpssd-style device and discovery daemons, the filter and job-processing pipeline (hpcups, hpijs), and scan/fax tooling, with supporting libraries and Python components. The root-cause class is CWE-122, heap-based buffer overflow, meaning data of attacker-influenced length is written into a heap-allocated buffer without adequate bounds checking, corrupting adjacent heap metadata and enabling control-flow hijack, memory disclosure, or crash. The single CPE cpe:2.3:a:hp_inc.:hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_(hplip):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, with a wildcard version, indicates the advisory covers HPLIP broadly rather than one pinned release, and the accompanying tags (RCE, privilege escalation, buffer overflow, heap overflow, denial of service, information disclosure) confirm that the bundle spans several distinct defect types. Practically, the RCE and DoS paths imply a network-facing or input-processing surface - the print/scan job pipeline, network discovery, or IPP-style handling - while the privilege-escalation and unauthorized-file-modification issues most plausibly require prior local access to the host, which is why the aggregate AV:N vector overstates reachability for part of the bundle (assessed AV:N/AC:H, PR:N, UI:N).

Know when Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Worst-case bundled component is a remote heap-overflow RCE (AV:N/PR:N), but AC:H reflects heap-grooming difficulty; C/I/A:H mirror the RCE outcome, though local-only sub-issues would score lower.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat 8.4 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 16, 2026 - 20:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 16, 2026 - 18:53 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.3

DescriptionCVE.org

HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-91104) in HP Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) affects Linux systems where the software is installed and active, potentially allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute code, escalate privileges, or cause denial of service. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and no vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, but the critical severity and potential for data breach or operational disruption require immediate attention. Leadership should prioritize assessing exposure and implementing interim controls to protect business operations and sensitive data.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Interim mitigations: disable unnecessary HPLIP services (CUPS, scanner); restrict network access to printing services via firewall rules; apply least privilege; monitor logs for exploitation attempts; subscribe to HP security advisories for hpsbpi04151.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 48% exploitable
Prevalence
High
default HP printer/scanner driver bundled in major Linux distributions
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

47
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Critical
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy