Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local access to HPLIP host
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious input to HPLIP component
  3. Exploit
    Trigger command injection via user action
  4. Execution
    Execute injected OS commands
  5. Impact
    Escalate privileges or corrupt/disclose data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires LOCAL access to a host running HP's HPLIP software with associated HP imaging/printing hardware or services (AV:L), plus active user interaction (UI:A) - the attacker must either be a local user or induce a legitimate user to perform an action that feeds attacker-controlled input into a vulnerable HPLIP component that constructs an OS command (CWE-78). No authentication or elevated privileges are needed (PR:N), but the attack is NOT remotely exploitable and does not work against a host with no user action. Because this is a bundled advisory, exact triggering features vary per underlying vulnerability; limiting factors are the local vector, required user interaction, and the need for HPLIP to be installed and in use.

Impact

The vendor CVSS 4.0 score of 8.4 is driven by high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (VC:H/VI:H/VA:H), but the vector itself moderates the real-world risk: AV:L means this is a LOCAL attack vector, not remote, and UI:A requires active user interaction. Despite PR:N (no privileges required), the local + user-interaction requirement means an attacker cannot exploit this over the network against a default deployment. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are provided in the input, so there is no evidence of active or imminent exploitation - this is a proactively-remediated vendor advisory rather than a fire-drill. A key caveat: this is a BUNDLED advisory (hpsbpi04151) covering MULTIPLE distinct vulnerabilities aggregated under one CVE/score, so the single CVSS vector may represent the worst-case component and not every underlying flaw. The description hedges heavily ('could potentially enable... under certain conditions'), which is consistent with a rollup rather than a single confirmed exploit path. Net: a legitimately high-severity local flaw worth patching on HP-printer Linux hosts, but not an internet-facing emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

On a Linux workstation running HPLIP with an HP printer, a local unprivileged user (or a lured legitimate user) triggers a crafted input - such as a malicious printer/scanner configuration, device name, or file processed by an HPLIP component - that is passed unsanitized into a shell command (CWE-78). Because user interaction is required (UI:A), the attacker either acts as the local user or induces the victim to perform the triggering action, achieving command injection with the resulting code executing in the HPLIP/service context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Command injection weaknesses in HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary operating-system commands with the privileges of the affected HPLIP component, resulting in high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (vendor CVSS 4.0 base 8.4) and spanning remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, and unauthorized file modification. Exploitation is not remote: it requires local access to a Linux host that has HPLIP installed and in use, and it requires active user interaction, typically by inducing a legitimate user to feed attacker-controlled input into a vulnerable HPLIP component that builds an OS command (CWE-78). No authentication or elevated privileges are needed (PR:N), and no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis; HP has released remediation for the affected components in advisory HPSBPI04151.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: HP has identified and remediated these HPLIP vulnerabilities, and the authoritative fix guidance, affected component list, and any corrected package versions are published in HP Security Bulletin HPSBPI04151 (https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15646959-15646984-16/hpsbpi04151); apply the HP-provided HPLIP update for your distribution and re-verify the installed version against that bulletin, since exact fix version numbers are not enumerated in the data available here. Where immediate updating is not possible, compensating controls should target the required attack prerequisites: remove or disable HPLIP components and printing services that are not needed (for example, stop and mask unused hplip/CUPS-related D-Bus services and backends), which reduces the attack surface but breaks printing, scanning, and faxing for the affected host; run HPLIP only from trusted, non-administrative local accounts and avoid executing hp-* utilities against untrusted or attacker-supplied input or device names, which lowers injection success but depends on user discipline rather than technical enforcement; and isolate multi-user or kiosk systems where untrusted local users can operate HPLIP, accepting the trade-off of reduced printing functionality and added management overhead. Detection should focus on unusual child processes spawned by HPLIP helpers and unexpected file writes to print/scan spool paths.

Affected VersionsENISA

HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) 0 <3.26.6

Affected Packages

euvd hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_hplip fix: 3.26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HPLIP is HP's open-source Linux driver and utility stack for imaging and printing devices; it ships Python-based tooling, CUPS backends, D-Bus services, and privileged helpers that manage device discovery, scanning, faxing, and print job handling. The root cause class here is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command), meaning input influenced by a local user or by a device/service interaction is passed into shell invocation paths without adequate sanitization, letting an attacker inject additional commands that run in the context of the HPLIP process or helper. This CVE is a bundled advisory covering multiple externally reported issues across several HPLIP components, so the exact triggering feature and code path vary per underlying defect. The vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H) is consistent with our independent assessment (CVSS 3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H): both agree this is a local, unauthenticated-but-user-interaction-dependent issue with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and both explicitly exclude network-only exploitation. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hp_inc.:hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_(hplip) uses a wildcard version, indicating the advisory does not scope itself to a single HPLIP release line but addresses affected components across the product.

Know when Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 8.4 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local vector and required user interaction (AV:L/UI:R) per vendor UI:A; PR:N as no prior privileges needed; command injection yields full C/I/A:H in an unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat 7.8 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 16, 2026 - 20:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 16, 2026 - 18:50 cve.org
HIGH 8.4

DescriptionCVE.org

HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

HP's Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP), the standard printing driver stack on many enterprise Linux workstations and servers, contains a high-severity command injection flaw (CVSS 8.4) that could allow a local user on an affected host to run operating-system commands under the privileges of the printing component. Because the flaw requires local access and a user to feed crafted input into HPLIP, the practical risk concentrates on multi-user Linux endpoints and any server that hosts printing services, where a successful attack could expose data, alter files, or disrupt the host. Leadership should care because no vendor-released patch has been identified at this time, so risk reduction depends on compensating controls, inventory, and restricting who can interact with HPLIP-enabled systems rather than a simple update.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis (remediation referenced in HP advisory HPSBPI04151; exact fixed version not provided in the analyzed context). Interim mitigations: remove or disable HPLIP and related CUPS printing services on Linux hosts that do not require printing; restrict local and interactive access to HPLIP-enabled systems to trusted users only; prevent untrusted or externally sourced input from being passed into HPLIP components that build OS commands; run affected services with least privilege so command execution cannot escalate beyond the printing component; monitor and alert on anomalous child processes spawned by HPLIP/CUPS; and maintain an inventory of HPLIP installations to enable rapid patching once HP publishes fixed builds.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Distro-bundled HP printer/scanner stack, installed on Linux hosts with HP hardware
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

42
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy