Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Position malicious/spoofed HP device or file
  2. Delivery
    Victim initiates print/scan operation
  3. Exploit
    Malformed data reaches HPLIP parser
  4. Execution
    Trigger heap buffer overflow (CWE-122)
  5. Persist
    Execute code in HPLIP context
  6. Impact
    RCE, privilege escalation or data disclosure

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires active user interaction (CVSS UI:A) on a Linux host running HPLIP - for example the victim performing a print or scan operation, connecting to or accepting data from an attacker-controlled or spoofed HP imaging device, or opening/processing attacker-supplied imaging data through HPLIP. No prior authentication or privileges are needed (PR:N), and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N), but the required victim action and dependence on HPLIP being installed and in use with HP printing/scanning are the primary limiting factors. The advisory is a bundled multi-vulnerability roll-up and does not name the exact vulnerable component, protocol, or configuration; specific preconditions must be confirmed against HP bulletin hpsbpi04151.

Impact

This is a vendor-authored (HP) bundled advisory covering MULTIPLE distinct vulnerabilities in HPLIP, scored in aggregate at CVSS 4.0 8.6 (High). The vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:A with VC:H/VI:H/VA:H and CWE-122 (heap-based buffer overflow) points to a network-reachable heap overflow enabling potential remote code execution, but the UI:A (active user interaction required) metric is the key limiting signal - successful exploitation depends on a victim performing an action (e.g., printing/scanning to or connecting a malicious/spoofed device, or processing attacker-supplied data), not purely passive remote compromise. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - treat exploitation status as 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The 8.6 is a vendor self-assessment for a rolled-up set of issues ('remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification'), meaning the single CVE ID conflates several impacts with varying real severity; the described worst-case (RCE via heap overflow) is credible but gated behind user interaction, making this an elevated-but-not-emergency priority absent exploitation signals. Because the description is deliberately vague ('under certain conditions'), specific attack preconditions cannot be confirmed from the input and should be verified against HP bulletin hpsbpi04151.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious printer/scanner response or a poisoned imaging file that, when processed by a Linux host running HPLIP, overflows a heap buffer (CWE-122). A victim triggers the vulnerable code path through normal print/scan activity or by connecting to an attacker-controlled or spoofed HP device, allowing the attacker to corrupt heap memory and potentially execute code in the HPLIP process context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software) is affected by multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities (CWE-122) that can lead to remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification. Exploitation requires user interaction, such as a victim performing a print or scan operation or processing attacker-supplied imaging data, but no authentication is needed, and the attack is network-reachable. HP has remediated the issues; no public exploit code has been identified at the time of analysis.

RemediationAI

HP has released remediation for these vulnerabilities; apply the updates specified in the HP security bulletin hpsbpi04151 (https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15646959-15646984-16/hpsbpi04151). Since the advisory does not provide an exact fixed version, consult the bulletin for the appropriate updated HPLIP package. As a compensating control, restrict network access to HPLIP services (e.g., via firewall rules) and avoid processing untrusted print or scan jobs, though this may limit printing functionality. Note that the vulnerabilities require user interaction, so user awareness training to avoid opening suspicious imaging data can reduce risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) 0 <3.26.6

Affected Packages

euvd hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_hplip fix: 3.26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HPLIP is an open-source suite of Linux drivers and utilities for HP printers and scanners, handling tasks such as printing, scanning, faxing, and device management. The vulnerabilities stem from heap-based buffer overflows (CWE-122), where data written to a heap buffer exceeds its allocated size, corrupting adjacent memory and potentially enabling code execution or crashes. The affected components are not explicitly named in the advisory, but network-facing services and data parsers within HPLIP are likely vectors. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A) indicates a network attack vector with low complexity, no privileges required, but user interaction needed. The independent assessment confirms this with a CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), highlighting high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Know when Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable heap overflow needing no auth (PR:N) but requiring victim print/scan interaction (UI:R); heap RCE yields full C:H/I:H/A:H within the unchanged process scope (S:U).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat 8.8 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 16, 2026 - 20:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 16, 2026 - 18:54 cve.org
HIGH 8.6

DescriptionCVE.org

HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

HPLIP, a widely used printing and imaging software for Linux, contains multiple heap-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities that could allow remote attackers to execute code, escalate privileges, or cause denial of service on affected systems. These flaws are network-reachable and require user interaction, such as initiating a print or scan job, putting organizations with Linux workstations and print servers at risk. With no vendor patch currently available, leadership should prioritize mitigation to prevent potential system compromise and data loss.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to printing services, disabling unused print/scan features, enforcing user awareness to avoid processing untrusted imaging data, and monitoring for anomalous printing activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 49% exploitable
Prevalence
High
HPLIP is the default HP printer/scanner driver stack shipped in most Linux distributions
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +43
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy