Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to process malicious HP print/scan input
  2. Delivery
    Deliver crafted device response or file
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in HPLIP
  4. Execution
    Corrupt heap memory / hijack control flow
  5. Impact
    Execute code or escalate privileges on host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software) installed and actively processing attacker-influenced input - a crafted print job, scanner/device response, or file handled by the HPLIP stack. The CVSS vector's UI:A (active user interaction) means exploitation is gated on the victim initiating or accepting the malicious operation (e.g., connecting to or printing from/scanning with a rogue device, or opening crafted content routed through HPLIP); it is not a fully autonomous remote exploit. Limiting factors: only Linux hosts with HPLIP installed (typically those using HP printers/scanners) are affected, exploitation is conditional ('under certain conditions' per HP), and impact varies by which of the bundled sub-vulnerabilities is triggered. Authentication is unauthenticated (PR:N) per the vendor vector.

Impact

This is a genuine priority for Linux fleets that use HP printers, but the aggregate nature of the advisory limits precision. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A) describes network-reachable, unauthenticated exploitation with high confidentiality/integrity/availability impact, but crucially requires active user interaction (UI:A). No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC are present in the supplied data, so exploitation is theoretical at time of analysis rather than observed. A key caveat: this single CVE bundles 'multiple externally reported vulnerabilities' with outcomes ranging from RCE to information disclosure 'under certain conditions,' and the assigned CWE-122 (heap-based buffer overflow) captures only one class among them - the true per-issue risk is not separable from this advisory alone. The 8.6 score is vendor-asserted and reasonable for the worst-case heap-overflow-to-RCE path, but the UI:A requirement and lack of any exploitation signal (EPSS/KEV/POC) place this below drive-by, worm-class threats. Treat as a high-priority patch for HP-printer Linux hosts, not an emergency for the general population.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positions a malicious device, print job, or crafted file that HPLIP will process (e.g., a rogue network printer/scanner or a booby-trapped document sent to an HP print pipeline), and the victim's HPLIP-enabled Linux host parses it. The crafted input triggers the heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122), corrupting memory to achieve code execution, privilege escalation, or a crash. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and successful attack depends on the victim actively interacting with the malicious input (UI:A).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflows and related memory-safety flaws in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software) let remote attackers corrupt memory in the print, scan, and device-discovery stack, potentially yielding remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification. Only Linux hosts with HPLIP installed and actively processing attacker-influenced input - a crafted print job, a rogue printer/scanner response, or a file handled by the HPLIP stack - are affected, and exploitation is gated on active user interaction (initiating or accepting the malicious print/scan operation) rather than being a fully autonomous remote exploit. The flaws are unauthenticated per the vendor CVSS vector (PR:N), impact varies depending on which bundled sub-vulnerability is triggered, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: HP has remediated the reported issues and published HP Security Bulletin HPSBPI04151 (https://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_15646959-15646984-16/hpsbpi04151), so the primary action is to install the fixed HPLIP release - either the updated HP-supplied package from the bulletin or the distribution's patched hplip package once your vendor ships it - and verify the installed version afterwards. Where patching must be deferred, apply targeted compensating controls and accept their trade-offs: remove or disable the HPLIP CUPS backend, hpcups/hpijs filters, and hpaio SANE driver on hosts that do not genuinely need HP printing or scanning (this fully removes the attack surface but breaks those features); restrict print/scan traffic to trusted subnets and block inbound JetDirect TCP 9100, SNMP 161/udp, and mDNS discovery from untrusted networks (reduces exposure to rogue-device and crafted-response attacks but can break network printer discovery); disable automatic plugin and driver downloads via hp-plugin and avoid discovering or connecting to printers on untrusted networks (prevents one common attacker-influenced input path at the cost of manual driver provisioning); run CUPS and HPLIP components under a confined SELinux or AppArmor profile and as non-root users so a successful heap corruption is less likely to yield privilege escalation (may require profile tuning and can cause compatibility failures); and configure CUPS operation policies, such as limiting which users may submit jobs and which backends are allowed, to shrink the set of inputs reaching the vulnerable code (adds administrative overhead and can block legitimate workflows).

Affected VersionsENISA

HP Linux Imaging and Printing Software (HPLIP) 0 <3.26.6

Affected Packages

euvd hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_hplip fix: 3.26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CVE-2026-91098 is rooted in CWE-122 (heap-based buffer overflow), where HPLIP trusts length or size fields in attacker-influenced input and copies more data into a heap buffer than was allocated, corrupting adjacent heap metadata or function pointers. HPLIP is HP's Linux driver and utilities suite for printers and scanners; the exposed attack surface includes the CUPS backend (the hp backend), the hpcups and hpijs print filters, SANE/hpaio scanner drivers, hp-plugin automatic driver/plugin download, and device discovery and management over SNMP, mDNS, and JetDirect port 9100. Because the HP advisory bundles several externally reported findings under one bulletin (HPSBPI04151), this CVE functions as an umbrella covering multiple sub-vulnerabilities spanning RCE, local privilege escalation, DoS, information disclosure, and unauthorized file modification, and the assigned CVSS 8.6 (CVSS:4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A, C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects the highest-impact combination rather than a single isolated defect. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:hp_inc.:hp_linux_imaging_and_printing_software_(hplip):*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, confirming that all pre-fix HPLIP releases are treated as affected.

Know when Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hp) PRIMARY 8.6 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable heap overflow needing no auth but requiring the victim to process malicious input (UI:R); worst-case bundled flaw yields RCE, so C/I/A:H, scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Red Hat 8.8 HIGH

Primary rating from Vendor (hp).

CVSS VectorVendor: hp

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Sep 16, 2026 - 20:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 16, 2026 - 18:43 cve.org
HIGH 8.6

DescriptionCVE.org

HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Unpatched memory-safety flaws in HPLIP, the HP Linux printing and imaging software, expose Linux workstations, print servers, and imaging endpoints to remote code execution, privilege escalation, and data disclosure whenever a user prints, scans, or auto-discovers a device. Because no vendor fix is yet available and the attack path runs through ordinary business printing and scanning activity, the risk is concentrated in Linux desktop fleets and CUPS print servers that process documents or communicate with network printers and scanners outside the organization's direct control. Leadership should treat this as a fleet-wide configuration and asset-hygiene issue for Linux endpoints rather than an internet-facing emergency.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: remove HPLIP from Linux hosts that do not print or scan; disable HPLIP/CUPS auto-discovery, hpcups, hp-systray, and saned where not required; restrict printer/scanner discovery and CUPS browsing to trusted subnets with printers and scanners segmented behind an internal print gateway; limit lpadmin and CUPS administration to a small named group; confine HPLIP and CUPS binaries with SELinux or AppArmor; and instruct users not to accept unsolicited printers/scanners or open untrusted print and scan jobs, since exploitation requires that user interaction.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 49% exploitable
Prevalence
High
HPLIP is the default HP printer/scanner driver stack bundled in most Linux distributions
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +43
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Important
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy