Skip to main content

cc-connect EUVDEUVD-2026-63172

| CVE-2026-76760 MEDIUM
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-08-19 VulDB GHSA-wfx9-6h8h-f3gm
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify internet-exposed cc-connect webhook endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted HTTP request with malicious exec argument
  3. Exploit
    Authenticate function processes unsanitized input
  4. Execution
    Code injection executes attacker-controlled payload on server
  5. Impact
    Arbitrary command execution achieved

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The webhook endpoint in cc-connect must be network-accessible to attackers - this is the intended deployment mode of a webhook receiver, making this condition met by default in any standard deployment. No authentication is required prior to reaching the vulnerable Authenticate function, as the CVSS vector specifies PR:N. No special configuration, feature flag, or non-default setting is described as required. The limiting factor is deployment footprint: cc-connect is a niche, low-adoption library, so mass exploitation is unlikely in practice. However, any instance exposed to the internet or an untrusted network segment is exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker with access to the public POC.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms low-complexity, unauthenticated network exploitation with no required user interaction - a highly exploitable posture. However, the provided impact metrics (VC:L/VI:L/VA:L) are notably inconsistent with the 'RCE' tag assigned by reporters: true OS command execution via os/exec would normally yield High confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, not Low across all three. This discrepancy is significant and unresolved - either the exec path is sandboxed or context-limited, or the impact metrics were underscored relative to actual capability. The EPSS score was not provided, limiting probabilistic exploitation forecasting. No KEV listing is present, but the public POC (E:P in the CVSS 4.0 supplemental) substantially lowers the bar for exploitation. The abandoned GitHub issue raises a critical concern: there is no vendor response path, and the CPE wildcard (*) covers all versions through 1.4.1 with no upper-bound fix version. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in legnica - used here purely as an illustrative hypothetical - would correctly treat any internet-exposed cc-connect instance as an unpatched, publicly exploitable endpoint requiring immediate isolation. The practical risk is elevated by the absence of a patch and the presence of a public exploit, regardless of the ambiguous impact-score discrepancy.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote, unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to the cc-connect webhook endpoint, supplying a malicious value in the exec parameter. The Authenticate function in core/webhook.go processes this input without sanitization and passes it to a code or command execution context. Because a public proof-of-concept exploit exists, this scenario requires minimal attacker skill and can be reproduced from existing tooling.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Remote code injection in chenhg5 cc-connect up to version 1.4.1 allows unauthenticated network attackers to execute arbitrary code by manipulating the exec argument passed to the Authenticate function in core/webhook.go. Tagged by reporters as RCE-capable, the vulnerability stems from unsanitized user input reaching a code execution path within the Go webhook handler. A public exploit has been disclosed; no patch has been released, as the upstream GitHub issue was closed automatically due to maintainer inactivity - leaving affected deployments without an official remediation path.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch has been identified at time of analysis - the upstream GitHub issue was closed due to inactivity without resolution. The primary recommended action is to remove or isolate cc-connect from internet-accessible environments immediately. As a compensating control, restrict network access to the webhook endpoint to trusted IP ranges only using firewall rules or a reverse proxy with IP allowlisting; this directly counters the AV:N attack vector but does not fix the underlying flaw. If the exec argument is not required by a specific integration, disable or strip that parameter at the reverse proxy or API gateway layer. Organizations running cc-connect should consider migrating to an actively maintained webhook framework, given the maintainer appears inactive. Monitor https://github.com/chenhg5/cc-connect/ and https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-76760 for any future patches or forks that address this issue.

Affected VersionsENISA

cc-connect 1.4.0
cc-connect 1.4.1

Affected Packages

euvd cc_connect no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

cc-connect (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:chenhg5:cc-connect:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) is a Go-based webhook connector authored by chenhg5. The affected code path is the Authenticate function in core/webhook.go. CWE-94 (Code Injection) describes the root cause: attacker-controlled input - specifically the exec argument - is passed into a code or command execution context without adequate sanitization or allowlisting. In Go projects, an exec-named parameter in a webhook handler strongly suggests use of the os/exec package or equivalent dynamic execution, meaning attacker-supplied strings can be interpreted as system-level commands or code. The webhook entry point is network-accessible by design, removing the need for prior authentication under the provided CVSS vector (PR:N). The combination of network reachability and an unsanitized exec argument in an authentication handler is a high-value injection surface.

Know when Cc Connect gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 7.3 HIGH

Network-reachable, no-auth webhook handler; impact set to Low across CIA to match provided 4.0 vector, pending clarification of exec scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
Aug 19, 2026 - 23:22 NVD
6.9 (MEDIUM) 5.5 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
Aug 19, 2026 - 22:45 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was found in chenhg5 cc-connect up to 1.4.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Authenticate of the file core/webhook.go. The manipulation of the argument exec results in code injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
obscure Go webhook library, minimal documented enterprise adoption
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy