Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessUser visits attacker-controlled page
-
DeliverySeparate renderer exploit compromises renderer process
-
ExploitCrafted navigation request sent from renderer
-
ExecutionInsufficient validation bypasses navigation restrictions
-
ImpactAttacker defeats cross-origin or sandbox navigation policy
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the attacker has ALREADY compromised the Chrome renderer process through a separate vulnerability - this is explicitly stated in the CVE description ('a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process'). The user must also visit an attacker-controlled crafted HTML page (UI:R), meaning user interaction is mandatory. No special Chrome configuration is needed beyond a standard browser session; however, the renderer pre-compromise prerequisite is the decisive limiting factor. Defenses that limit exploitation: Site Isolation (default on) constrains renderer scope; any endpoint detection of browser process anomalies; and the absence of a chained renderer-level exploit in the attacker's toolkit. Authentication to Chrome or Google services is not required for navigation bypass once the renderer is controlled. |
| Impact | The NVD-assigned CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) rates attack complexity as Low, which overstates the realistic bar: exploitation definitionally requires a prior renderer compromise, a non-trivial chaining condition that CVSS AC:L does not reflect. An independent assessment of AC:H is more accurate. EPSS at 0.18% (8th percentile) corroborates a low near-term exploitation probability. The flaw is not in CISA KEV and no POC has been identified. Chrome's security severity is rated Low by the Chromium team. In practice, this vulnerability matters primarily to attackers who are already executing within a compromised renderer and need to defeat navigation restrictions as part of a sandbox-escape chain. Organizations running current Chrome channels are protected by the 151.0.7922.72 patch. The real priority is low for most environments - high-value targets with sophisticated adversaries (nation-state, APT) capable of chaining renderer exploits represent the realistic threat model. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already achieved code execution within Chrome's renderer process - for example, via a separate V8 heap exploitation bug - crafts a malicious HTML page that sends specially formed navigation requests. The insufficient input validation in the Navigation component allows these requests to bypass navigation restrictions that would normally constrain a sandboxed renderer, enabling the attacker to navigate to privileged browser-internal pages or bypass cross-origin navigation policies as a step in a broader sandbox-escape chain. No public POC has been identified, making this scenario primarily relevant to sophisticated, multi-stage exploit chains. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 30, 2026
Navigation input validation bypass in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 enables a renderer-compromised attacker to circumvent navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. The flaw is the second stage of a chained attack - exploitation requires a prior renderer process compromise, substantially raising the practical bar for abuse. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; EPSS sits at 0.18% (8th percentile), consistent with its role as a post-exploitation primitive rather than an initial access vector.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Chrome 151.0.7922.72. Update Chrome to version 151.0.7922.72 or later via the browser's built-in update mechanism (Help > About Google Chrome) or via enterprise deployment tooling (SCCM, Intune, etc.). The stable channel update is documented at http://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html. Because exploitation requires a prior renderer compromise, organizations should also prioritize patching against renderer-level memory-corruption bugs that could serve as the first-stage exploit in a chain. As a compensating control prior to patching, enabling Chrome's Site Isolation feature (already default in modern Chrome but worth verifying in managed deployments) limits renderer blast radius, though it does not directly address this flaw. No functional workaround removes the navigation validation gap without the upstream patch.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Google Chrome's renderer process handles HTML parsing, JavaScript execution, and navigation logic within a sandboxed context. CVE-2026-17988 stems from CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) in the Navigation component, where attacker-controlled data originating from a compromised renderer is not sufficiently validated before influencing navigation decisions. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux). The Navigation component bridges the renderer (untrusted) and browser process (trusted), and insufficient boundary enforcement at this interface is the root cause class. A renderer compromise is the prerequisite - typically achieved via a separate V8 or Blink memory-corruption bug - after which this flaw extends the attacker's reach by defeating navigation-level security policies.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Sources disagree (Low–Critical)AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
AC:H reflects the mandatory renderer-compromise prerequisite; all other metrics align with network delivery, required user interaction, and integrity-only impact.
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Related Vulnerabilities in Google Chrome Implementation and Policy Flaws
View all 50Same weakness CWE-20 – Improper Input Validation
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Critical| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Fixed |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Fixed |
| SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-50914
GHSA-whqv-v3xx-92x8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB