Skip to main content

Google Chrome EUVDEUVD-2026-50914

| CVE-2026-17988 MEDIUM
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-07-30 Chrome GHSA-whqv-v3xx-92x8
Medium
Disputed · 6.5 Vendor: Chrome
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    User visits attacker-controlled page
  2. Delivery
    Separate renderer exploit compromises renderer process
  3. Exploit
    Crafted navigation request sent from renderer
  4. Execution
    Insufficient validation bypasses navigation restrictions
  5. Impact
    Attacker defeats cross-origin or sandbox navigation policy

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the attacker has ALREADY compromised the Chrome renderer process through a separate vulnerability - this is explicitly stated in the CVE description ('a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process'). The user must also visit an attacker-controlled crafted HTML page (UI:R), meaning user interaction is mandatory. No special Chrome configuration is needed beyond a standard browser session; however, the renderer pre-compromise prerequisite is the decisive limiting factor. Defenses that limit exploitation: Site Isolation (default on) constrains renderer scope; any endpoint detection of browser process anomalies; and the absence of a chained renderer-level exploit in the attacker's toolkit. Authentication to Chrome or Google services is not required for navigation bypass once the renderer is controlled.

Impact

The NVD-assigned CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) rates attack complexity as Low, which overstates the realistic bar: exploitation definitionally requires a prior renderer compromise, a non-trivial chaining condition that CVSS AC:L does not reflect. An independent assessment of AC:H is more accurate. EPSS at 0.18% (8th percentile) corroborates a low near-term exploitation probability. The flaw is not in CISA KEV and no POC has been identified. Chrome's security severity is rated Low by the Chromium team. In practice, this vulnerability matters primarily to attackers who are already executing within a compromised renderer and need to defeat navigation restrictions as part of a sandbox-escape chain. Organizations running current Chrome channels are protected by the 151.0.7922.72 patch. The real priority is low for most environments - high-value targets with sophisticated adversaries (nation-state, APT) capable of chaining renderer exploits represent the realistic threat model.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already achieved code execution within Chrome's renderer process - for example, via a separate V8 heap exploitation bug - crafts a malicious HTML page that sends specially formed navigation requests. The insufficient input validation in the Navigation component allows these requests to bypass navigation restrictions that would normally constrain a sandboxed renderer, enabling the attacker to navigate to privileged browser-internal pages or bypass cross-origin navigation policies as a step in a broader sandbox-escape chain. No public POC has been identified, making this scenario primarily relevant to sophisticated, multi-stage exploit chains.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 30, 2026

Navigation input validation bypass in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 enables a renderer-compromised attacker to circumvent navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. The flaw is the second stage of a chained attack - exploitation requires a prior renderer process compromise, substantially raising the practical bar for abuse. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; EPSS sits at 0.18% (8th percentile), consistent with its role as a post-exploitation primitive rather than an initial access vector.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Chrome 151.0.7922.72. Update Chrome to version 151.0.7922.72 or later via the browser's built-in update mechanism (Help > About Google Chrome) or via enterprise deployment tooling (SCCM, Intune, etc.). The stable channel update is documented at http://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0887107924.html. Because exploitation requires a prior renderer compromise, organizations should also prioritize patching against renderer-level memory-corruption bugs that could serve as the first-stage exploit in a chain. As a compensating control prior to patching, enabling Chrome's Site Isolation feature (already default in modern Chrome but worth verifying in managed deployments) limits renderer blast radius, though it does not directly address this flaw. No functional workaround removes the navigation validation gap without the upstream patch.

Affected VersionsENISA

Chrome 151.0.7922.72 <151.0.7922.72

Affected Packages

euvd chrome fix: 151.0.7922.72

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Google Chrome's renderer process handles HTML parsing, JavaScript execution, and navigation logic within a sandboxed context. CVE-2026-17988 stems from CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) in the Navigation component, where attacker-controlled data originating from a compromised renderer is not sufficiently validated before influencing navigation decisions. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux). The Navigation component bridges the renderer (untrusted) and browser process (trusted), and insufficient boundary enforcement at this interface is the root cause class. A renderer compromise is the prerequisite - typically achieved via a separate V8 or Blink memory-corruption bug - after which this flaw extends the attacker's reach by defeating navigation-level security policies.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Sources disagree (Low–Critical)
Vendor (Chrome) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

AC:H reflects the mandatory renderer-compromise prerequisite; all other metrics align with network delivery, required user interaction, and integrity-only impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE CRITICAL
Red Hat 2.8 LOW

vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.

CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Jul 30, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Jul 30, 2026 - 02:02 EUVD
CVE Published
Jul 30, 2026 - 00:25 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Jul 30, 2026 - 00:25 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
dominant desktop browser globally, present in virtually all enterprise and consumer environments
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Critical
Product Status
SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 Fixed
openSUSE Leap 16.0 Fixed
SUSE Package Hub 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy