Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAdmin receives withdrawal approval email with tokenized GET link
-
ExploitEmail client auto-prefetches review URL
-
ExecutionServer executes withdrawal approval via HTTP GET
-
ImpactFinancial transaction approved without human review
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The passive exploitation path requires that the xianyu-auto-reply instance sends payment withdrawal review links via email and that the recipient's email client or mail security gateway automatically prefetches embedded URLs - a common behavior in Microsoft Outlook with Safe Links, Apple Mail, and various enterprise mail security products. The endpoint /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve must be reachable from the network location of the prefetching agent. Direct intentional abuse by an authenticated low-privilege user is constrained by the requirement to possess a valid, presumably randomly generated review token bound to a specific withdrawal request ID. Exploitation is not possible against default unauthenticated states; low-level authentication (PR:L per CVSS 4.0) is required, meaning the prefetch path operates under the legitimate session or token context embedded in the review URL. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 reflects limited scope: integrity and availability are both Low, with no confidentiality impact, and PR:L indicates low-privilege authentication is required. The E:P supplemental metric confirms a publicly available proof-of-concept, raising the practical exploitation likelihood above the base score alone. No EPSS data was provided in the input, and no CISA KEV entry is present. Despite the low numeric score, the financial integrity implications are contextually elevated: the primary real-world attack path - automated email link prefetching triggering an admin-level payment approval - is passive, requires no deliberate adversarial action by an authenticated user, and may go undetected. Exploitation is constrained by the requirement for a valid, presumably randomly generated review token tied to a specific withdrawal ID, which limits opportunistic mass exploitation. The impact is bounded to the specific deployment's financial transaction integrity, not broad system compromise. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An administrator receives an automated email notification containing a one-click approval link for a pending payment withdrawal, pointing to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve&id=42&token=<valid_token>. Before the administrator opens the message, the mail client or enterprise email security gateway automatically issues a GET request to prefetch the URL, and the unpatched server immediately executes the withdrawal approval. The financial transaction is committed without any human review, and the administrator sees no pending action when they eventually open the email. A public proof-of-concept has been disclosed, lowering the bar for intentional exploitation of this same GET-based approval path. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
The payment withdrawal approval endpoint in xianyu-auto-reply executes state-changing financial approval actions in response to HTTP GET requests, violating the HTTP safe-method contract and enabling unintended approvals through automated link-prefetching clients. Any low-privileged authenticated user possessing a valid review token can approve withdrawal requests by issuing a GET to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve, and more critically, email clients or mail-security gateways that automatically prefetch URLs can trigger approvals silently when an administrator receives a notification email. A proof-of-concept has been publicly disclosed per CVSS 4.0 E:P; no CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply upstream patch commit 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd available at https://github.com/zhinianboke/xianyu-auto-reply/commit/19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd. No released tagged version has been independently confirmed to include this fix - users should verify the commit is present in their deployed branch. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict network access to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review to trusted internal IP ranges, preventing external mail security gateways and link scanners from reaching the endpoint; the trade-off is that remote administrator approval workflows will require VPN or equivalent access. Additionally, configuring email clients used by administrators to disable automatic link prefetching eliminates the passive exploitation path without affecting the application itself.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
xianyu-auto-reply is a FastAPI-based Python application (GitHub: zhinianboke/xianyu-auto-reply) providing automated reply and distribution management features, including a payment withdrawal review workflow. The vulnerability resides in backend-web/app/api/routes/payment.py at the /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review endpoint. CWE-650 (Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side) describes the root cause: the server assigned business-critical, irreversible approval semantics to an HTTP GET handler, which RFC 7231 mandates be safe and idempotent. The fix in commit 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd - explicitly commented in Chinese as 'Safety: GET requests do not directly change the review status, avoiding email prefetch/link scanner mis-triggering approval' - splits the flow so GET only validates the token and renders a confirmation page, while the actual approval is delegated to an explicit POST to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/approve. No CPE string was included in the input data.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Network-reachable endpoint requiring low-privilege authentication; GET-based approval affects financial integrity only, with no confidentiality or availability impact warranting a non-N rating.
Primary rating from Vendor (vuldb).
CVSS VectorVendor: vuldb
DescriptionCVE.org
A vulnerability was determined in zhinianboke xianyu-auto-reply on Server. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve. Executing a manipulation can lead to trusting http permission methods on the server side. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-44575
GHSA-3rf8-mgfc-9vfp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB