Skip to main content

xianyu-auto-reply CVE-2026-15753

| EUVDEUVD-2026-44575 LOW
Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side (CWE-650)
2026-07-14 cna@vuldb.com GHSA-3rf8-mgfc-9vfp
2.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: vuldb
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Admin receives withdrawal approval email with tokenized GET link
  2. Exploit
    Email client auto-prefetches review URL
  3. Execution
    Server executes withdrawal approval via HTTP GET
  4. Impact
    Financial transaction approved without human review

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
Exploitation Conditions

The passive exploitation path requires that the xianyu-auto-reply instance sends payment withdrawal review links via email and that the recipient's email client or mail security gateway automatically prefetches embedded URLs - a common behavior in Microsoft Outlook with Safe Links, Apple Mail, and various enterprise mail security products. The endpoint /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve must be reachable from the network location of the prefetching agent. Direct intentional abuse by an authenticated low-privilege user is constrained by the requirement to possess a valid, presumably randomly generated review token bound to a specific withdrawal request ID. Exploitation is not possible against default unauthenticated states; low-level authentication (PR:L per CVSS 4.0) is required, meaning the prefetch path operates under the legitimate session or token context embedded in the review URL.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 2.1 reflects limited scope: integrity and availability are both Low, with no confidentiality impact, and PR:L indicates low-privilege authentication is required. The E:P supplemental metric confirms a publicly available proof-of-concept, raising the practical exploitation likelihood above the base score alone. No EPSS data was provided in the input, and no CISA KEV entry is present. Despite the low numeric score, the financial integrity implications are contextually elevated: the primary real-world attack path - automated email link prefetching triggering an admin-level payment approval - is passive, requires no deliberate adversarial action by an authenticated user, and may go undetected. Exploitation is constrained by the requirement for a valid, presumably randomly generated review token tied to a specific withdrawal ID, which limits opportunistic mass exploitation. The impact is bounded to the specific deployment's financial transaction integrity, not broad system compromise.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An administrator receives an automated email notification containing a one-click approval link for a pending payment withdrawal, pointing to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve&id=42&token=<valid_token>. Before the administrator opens the message, the mail client or enterprise email security gateway automatically issues a GET request to prefetch the URL, and the unpatched server immediately executes the withdrawal approval. The financial transaction is committed without any human review, and the administrator sees no pending action when they eventually open the email. A public proof-of-concept has been disclosed, lowering the bar for intentional exploitation of this same GET-based approval path.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

The payment withdrawal approval endpoint in xianyu-auto-reply executes state-changing financial approval actions in response to HTTP GET requests, violating the HTTP safe-method contract and enabling unintended approvals through automated link-prefetching clients. Any low-privileged authenticated user possessing a valid review token can approve withdrawal requests by issuing a GET to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve, and more critically, email clients or mail-security gateways that automatically prefetch URLs can trigger approvals silently when an administrator receives a notification email. A proof-of-concept has been publicly disclosed per CVSS 4.0 E:P; no CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply upstream patch commit 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd available at https://github.com/zhinianboke/xianyu-auto-reply/commit/19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd. No released tagged version has been independently confirmed to include this fix - users should verify the commit is present in their deployed branch. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict network access to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review to trusted internal IP ranges, preventing external mail security gateways and link scanners from reaching the endpoint; the trade-off is that remote administrator approval workflows will require VPN or equivalent access. Additionally, configuring email clients used by administrators to disable automatic link prefetching eliminates the passive exploitation path without affecting the application itself.

Affected VersionsENISA

xianyu-auto-reply n/a

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

xianyu-auto-reply is a FastAPI-based Python application (GitHub: zhinianboke/xianyu-auto-reply) providing automated reply and distribution management features, including a payment withdrawal review workflow. The vulnerability resides in backend-web/app/api/routes/payment.py at the /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review endpoint. CWE-650 (Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side) describes the root cause: the server assigned business-critical, irreversible approval semantics to an HTTP GET handler, which RFC 7231 mandates be safe and idempotent. The fix in commit 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd - explicitly commented in Chinese as 'Safety: GET requests do not directly change the review status, avoiding email prefetch/link scanner mis-triggering approval' - splits the flow so GET only validates the token and renders a confirmation page, while the actual approval is delegated to an explicit POST to /api/v1/payment/withdraw/approve. No CPE string was included in the input data.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (vuldb) PRIMARY 2.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable endpoint requiring low-privilege authentication; GET-based approval affects financial integrity only, with no confidentiality or availability impact warranting a non-N rating.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (vuldb).

CVSS VectorVendor: vuldb

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability was determined in zhinianboke xianyu-auto-reply on Server. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /api/v1/payment/withdraw/review?action=approve. Executing a manipulation can lead to trusting http permission methods on the server side. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 19fc3282a1bb78a05c34945c088525d20e081cbd. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 82% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
niche open-source project, limited known enterprise adoption
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

10
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +10
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy