Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain valid low-privilege Windows credentials
  2. Delivery
    Connect to target over RDP (TCP/3389)
  3. Exploit
    Trigger uninitialized resource access in RDP service
  4. Execution
    Receive leaked memory contents from server
  5. Impact
    Extract sensitive data (tokens, keys, or process memory)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Variable initialization
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the attacker hold valid Windows credentials sufficient for an RDP login (low-privilege authorized user, as indicated by PR:L in the CVSS vector). The RDP service (TCP/3389) must be reachable from the attacker's network position - either directly exposed or accessible via an internal network segment or VPN. No special non-default configuration is required beyond RDP being enabled, which is the default on many Windows Server editions and commonly enabled on enterprise workstations. What limits exploitation: the attacker must already possess at least one valid account credential for the target system; unauthenticated internet-facing exploitation is ruled out by PR:L. There is no user interaction requirement beyond the attacker initiating the RDP connection, and no elevated privilege (admin) is needed.

Impact

The CVSS base score of 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) accurately reflects a network-reachable information disclosure requiring only low-privilege credentials. The high confidentiality sub-score signals that leaked data could be substantively sensitive, not merely benign metadata. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified statistically. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV and no public proof-of-concept has been identified, which reduces immediate urgency compared to actively exploited RDP flaws. The primary limiting factor is PR:L: an attacker must already hold valid Windows account credentials or an RDP session, meaning the threat model skews toward insider threats, compromised credential scenarios, and post-initial-access lateral movement rather than unauthenticated internet-facing mass exploitation. Despite the lack of active exploitation signals, the breadth of affected Windows versions and the sensitivity of data potentially accessible via RDP sessions elevate this above a routine medium-severity finding.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained valid low-privilege Windows credentials - through phishing, credential stuffing, or lateral movement - connects to a target system over RDP on TCP/3389 and triggers the uninitialized resource condition during the RDP session, causing the service to transmit uninitialized memory contents back to the client. Depending on what resides in uninitialized memory at exploitation time, the attacker may recover sensitive data such as session tokens, cryptographic keys, or other process memory, facilitating privilege escalation or further lateral movement. No public proof-of-concept is known at time of analysis, but the low-complexity CVSS vector (AC:L) suggests the trigger condition is not highly situational.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 1.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

Information disclosure via uninitialized resource use in Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) exposes sensitive memory contents to authenticated remote attackers across a wide range of Microsoft Windows desktop and server editions. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) confirms this is exploitable over the network by any low-privileged authenticated user with no complexity or interaction requirements, yielding high confidentiality impact. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the low barrier to exploitation and the ubiquitous deployment of Windows RDP make this a meaningful patching priority.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the vendor-released patch distributed by Microsoft; the advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982 provides the specific KB articles and update packages for each affected Windows version. Exact patched build versions are not independently confirmed from the available input data and must be verified against the MSRC advisory. Where patching cannot be applied immediately, organizations should restrict RDP (TCP/3389) exposure to trusted networks and VPN-gated endpoints via host-based firewall rules and network segmentation, reducing the attacker pool to already-authenticated internal users. Enabling Network Level Authentication (NLA) for all RDP sessions ensures that authentication occurs before a full RDP session is established, which limits the attack surface though it does not eliminate the flaw since PR:L is already required. Disabling RDP entirely on systems where remote desktop access is not operationally required eliminates the attack surface completely with the trade-off of losing remote management capability.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2525
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525, Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26226 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26226, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26226
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23291 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23291, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23291
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2525
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 31 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-908 (Use of Uninitialized Resource): the Windows RDP service reads from or transmits memory that has not been properly initialized before use, potentially leaking heap or stack contents to a connected client. RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol) operates over TCP/3389 and is a core Windows feature for remote administration and virtual desktop infrastructure. The affected CPE strings span Windows 10 (versions 1607 through 22H2), Windows 11 (versions 24H2, 25H2, 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2012 R2 per NVD CPE data; Microsoft's own tags extend the scope to Server 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025, indicating the flaw is present across the entire supported and legacy Windows ecosystem. Uninitialized resource bugs in protocol implementations can expose cryptographic material, session tokens, kernel pointers, or other process memory depending on allocation timing.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CIRCL (temporal) 5.7 MEDIUM
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network RDP access with low-privilege credentials is the sole prerequisite; only confidentiality is impacted as uninitialized memory is disclosed, not modified.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Use of uninitialized resource in Windows RDP allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
1.0%
Top 43% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows RDP is deployed across virtually all enterprise environments globally
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 1.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy