Skip to main content

Coolify EUVDEUVD-2026-41996

| CVE-2026-34037 CRITICAL
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639)
2026-07-07 GitHub_M
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GitHub_M
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Coolify instance
  2. Delivery
    Invoke cloneTo() Livewire action
  3. Exploit
    Supply cross-team destination resource ID
  4. Execution
    Unscoped Eloquent lookup resolves victim resource
  5. Impact
    Clone into and read other team's resources

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Object-level authorization, IDOR prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Requires an authenticated Coolify account (CVSS PR:L) and a multi-tenant deployment where more than one team exists - the attacker must be able to reference a destination resource ID owned by a different team, which is the concrete prerequisite since single-team instances have no cross-tenant target. The specific trigger is the cloneTo() Livewire action in ResourceOperations.php with an attacker-supplied destination ID; the source resource is properly authorized, so the abuse is entirely in the unscoped destination lookup. Limiting factors: a valid login is mandatory (not unauthenticated), and practical impact only materializes when the instance hosts multiple independent teams whose resources the attacker does not already own.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L yields 9.9 driven largely by the scope change (S:C) reflecting one tenant reaching another tenant's data. Real-world risk is meaningfully constrained by PR:L: exploitation requires a valid authenticated account on the Coolify instance, so exposure is highest on multi-team/shared or SaaS-style deployments and low on single-operator self-hosted installs where the attacker would already own all resources. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided, so there is no signal of active exploitation - no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The primary uncertainty is deployment model: the CVSS assumes a populated multi-tenant environment; a single-team instance has little practical impact despite the high base score, so defenders should weight this by whether their instance hosts multiple independent teams.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker signs up for or already holds a low-privileged account on a shared Coolify instance that hosts multiple teams. Using the clone feature, they invoke the cloneTo() Livewire action with a destination identifier belonging to another team, and because the destination is resolved without a team scope, they clone into and read resources owned by that victim tenant. No user interaction or elevated privileges are needed beyond the authenticated session; no public POC was provided.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026

Cross-tenant resource access in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.464 lets an authenticated user of one team clone resources into, and access resources owned by, other teams. The cloneTo() Livewire action in ResourceOperations.php checks authorization on the source resource but resolves destination resources with unscoped Eloquent lookups, breaking multi-tenant isolation. Rated CVSS 9.9 with scope change; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but a fixing commit and vendor advisory are published.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Coolify 4.0.0-beta.464 or later, which adds team scoping to destination resource resolution in the cloneTo() action (fixing commit 1759a1631cd63271ebf6caa250c6d93440eaa333; advisory GHSA-ggrr-wrvr-x83v at https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/security/advisories/GHSA-ggrr-wrvr-x83v; release https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.464). If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce the attack surface by limiting accounts to trusted operators and, where feasible, running one team per Coolify instance so cross-tenant lookups have nothing to reach - the trade-off is losing multi-team consolidation. Also restrict network access to the Coolify dashboard to trusted networks/VPN to shrink who can reach the authenticated Livewire endpoints, accepting the operational cost of gated access. These are stopgaps only; the clone/destination logic itself is not disableable per resource, so patching is the reliable fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

coolify < 4.0.0-beta.464

Affected Packages

euvd coolify fix: 4.0.0-beta.464

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Coolify is an open-source, self-hostable platform for deploying and managing servers, applications, and databases, built on the Laravel/Livewire (PHP) stack. The flaw is a classic CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key / IDOR): the cloneTo() action correctly scopes the source object to the caller's team but then loads the destination via a direct, unscoped Eloquent model lookup (e.g. Model::find($id)) driven by a user-supplied identifier, without re-checking team ownership. In a multi-tenant deployment where teams are the isolation boundary, any authenticated user can therefore reference IDs belonging to other tenants. The affected component is coollabsio/coolify per CPE cpe:2.3:a:coollabsio:coolify.

Know when Coolify gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GitHub_M) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Authenticated web action (PR:L, AV:N, AC:L) with no user interaction; tenant-boundary bypass justifies S:C, with high confidentiality/integrity over cross-team resources and low availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).

CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jul 07, 2026 - 05:01 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.464, the cloneTo() Livewire action in ResourceOperations.php authorizes the source resource but resolves destination resources with unscoped Eloquent lookups, allowing an authenticated user to clone resources into destinations owned by other teams and access cross-tenant resources. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.464.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Coolify instances before version 4.0.0-beta.464 are vulnerable to cross-team data access where an authenticated user of any team can read, clone, and manipulate resources belonging to other teams, defeating the core multi-tenant isolation guarantee. An attacker with valid credentials to a single team gains unauthorized access to production workloads, configurations, and databases of unrelated teams on the same platform. No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis creates immediate risk for organizations operating affected versions.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict Coolify instance access to minimum necessary personnel; (2) Implement network-level access controls isolating Coolify instance; (3) Disable resource cloning operations at application level if operationally feasible; (4) Enable detailed audit logging and alert on cross-team resource access patterns; (5) Conduct immediate review of team membership and resource ownership. Monitor vendor repository for security patch release.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source self-hosted PaaS, common but not enterprise-ubiquitous
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Out-of-Cycle
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

CVE-2026-57498 CRITICAL POC
9.6 Jun 29

Cross-team authorization bypass in Coolify (open-source self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.474 allows an authenticated,

CVE-2025-34161 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Aug 27

Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.7 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the project deplo

CVE-2025-34159 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Aug 27

Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.6 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the application d

CVE-2025-64424 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Command injection in Coolify up to and including v4.0.0-beta.434 lets any authenticated low-privileged 'member' execute

CVE-2025-59156 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Remote code execution on the host OS is possible through Coolify's application deployment workflow prior to version 4.0.

CVE-2025-66211 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated command injection in Coolify's PostgreSQL initialization-script filename handling allows users with applic

CVE-2025-66210 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Coolify versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.451 pass user-supplied database names unsanitized into shell commands executed via

CVE-2025-66213 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated Coolify users who hold application or service management permissions can execute arbitrary commands as roo

CVE-2025-66212 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.451 lets users with application or service management permi

CVE-2025-59158 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Stored cross-site scripting in Coolify versions up to and including v4.0.0-beta.420.6 lets an authenticated low-privileg

CVE-2026-34594 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 29

Authenticated OS command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.471 lets any user holding destination management permiss

CVE-2026-34597 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 29

Authenticated remote code execution in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.470 lets a low-privileged authentica

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy