Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAttacker authenticates with low-privilege Splunk account
-
DeliveryCraft classic dashboard panel with injected CSS style attribute referencing attacker domain
-
ExploitShare or link malicious dashboard to target higher-privileged user
-
ExecutionPhish victim into opening dashboard in browser
-
PersistVictim browser exfiltrates sensitive data via outbound request to attacker domain
-
ImpactAttacker captures session tokens or sensitive response data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker must hold a valid Splunk account with at least low-level privileges, explicitly excluding the 'admin' and 'power' roles, and must have permission to create and share classic dashboards within the Splunk instance. The victim must hold higher privileges (admin or power role) and must be successfully phished into opening the attacker-crafted dashboard in their browser - the attacker cannot trigger exfiltration autonomously and the description explicitly states 'the low-privileged user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.' Exploitation is further limited by: (1) the mandatory authenticated low-privilege account requirement (PR:L per CVSS), (2) the required user interaction (UI:R) meaning the attack fails without social engineering success, and (3) the classic dashboard feature must be available and accessible to the low-privileged attacker role. The Trusted Domains List is a partial control that this vulnerability specifically bypasses via style attribute injection, so its presence alone does not prevent exploitation. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.7 (Medium) accurately captures the conditional nature of this flaw: while the attack vector is network-based and complexity is low, both low privileges (PR:L) and required user interaction (UI:R) constrain real-world exploitability. The confidentiality impact is rated High (C:H), meaning successful exploitation could yield session tokens or sensitive query results, which is significant. SSVC assessment confirms exploitation as 'none' currently and automatable as 'no,' consistent with the mandatory phishing prerequisite - the attacker cannot trigger exfiltration autonomously. No EPSS score was provided in the input data; based on the social engineering dependency and absence from CISA KEV, exploitation probability is inferred as low at this time. The risk is not negligible for organizations where low-privileged users routinely share dashboards with administrative staff, or where dashboards are broadly accessible across privilege tiers - in those environments, the C:H rating becomes operationally meaningful. There is no integrity or availability impact. Overall: real but conditional risk warranting timely patching rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged Splunk user creates a classic dashboard containing a panel with a crafted CSS style attribute - for example, a background-image referencing an attacker-controlled server - then socially engineers a higher-privileged user such as an admin into opening that dashboard via a phishing message or a shared link in a collaboration channel. When the admin's browser renders the dashboard, it issues an outbound HTTP request to the attacker's server, including HTTP headers that may contain session cookies or authentication tokens, which the attacker captures and uses to impersonate the victim. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, but this CSS-based exfiltration technique requires no specialized tooling beyond a crafted dashboard definition. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 10, 2026
Classic dashboard style attribute injection in Splunk Enterprise and Splunk Cloud Platform enables a low-privileged authenticated user to craft panels that bypass the Trusted Domains List and exfiltrate sensitive data from a higher-privileged user's browser session. Affected branches span Splunk Enterprise below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and multiple Splunk Cloud Platform release trains. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and SSVC rates current exploitation as none with partial technical impact, though the high confidentiality impact potential warrants prompt patching in environments where low-privileged users can share dashboards with administrators.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, or 9.3.13 (or later within the respective branch) as confirmed by the vendor advisory SVD-2026-0607 at https://advisory.splunk.com/advisories/SVD-2026-0607. Splunk Cloud Platform customers should verify their instance has been updated to 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, or 9.3.2411.132 depending on their deployed release train; Splunk Cloud Platform updates are typically managed by Splunk and may already be applied. As a compensating control prior to patching, restrict classic dashboard creation and sharing permissions to trusted users only by reviewing role-based access controls - note this may impact legitimate analyst workflows. Additionally, audit existing classic dashboards for unexpected external domain references in style attributes, and ensure the Trusted Domains List is configured as restrictively as operationally possible to limit the blast radius of any bypass. Blocking outbound HTTP/HTTPS traffic from Splunk web servers to non-approved external domains at the network perimeter can further reduce exfiltration risk but may disrupt legitimate integrations.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation) within Splunk's classic dashboard rendering engine. Specifically, classic dashboard panel definitions accept CSS style attribute values that are not fully sanitized before being rendered in a viewer's browser. This allows injection of CSS constructs - such as background-image or similar properties - that reference arbitrary external URLs, effectively circumventing the Trusted Domains List enforcement intended to restrict outbound browser requests. When a higher-privileged user loads the malicious dashboard, their browser issues HTTP requests to attacker-controlled infrastructure, potentially leaking HTTP headers including session tokens. CPE strings cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_enterprise and cpe:2.3:a:splunk:splunk_cloud_platform confirm both the self-hosted and managed SaaS products are affected across multiple release branches. This is a well-understood class of CSS-based data exfiltration, distinct from traditional reflected or stored XSS in that it operates via style injection rather than script execution.
Know when Splunk gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network-accessible dashboard feature exploited by authenticated low-privilege user; victim interaction mandatory; only browser-side confidentiality impacted with no integrity or availability effect.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionNVD
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.4, 10.0.7, 9.4.12, and 9.3.13, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.3.2512.13, 10.2.2510.15, 10.1.2507.23, and 9.3.2411.132, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could craft a classic dashboard that exfiltrates sensitive data from the browser of a higher-privileged user who views it.
The exfiltration is possible because classic dashboard panels do not fully validate style attribute values, which can allow for requests to reach external domains outside the configured Trusted Domains List.
The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The low-privileged user should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe
Unauthenticated arbitrary file write in Splunk Enterprise (below 10.2.4 and 10.0.7) and Splunk Cloud Platform (below 10.
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when
curl < 7.84.0 supports "chained" HTTP compression algorithms, meaning that a serverresponse can be compressed multiple t
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10, a low-privileged user that does not hold the admin or powe
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.0.7 and 9.1.2, Splunk Enterprise does not safely sanitize extensible stylesheet la
In versions of Splunk Enterprise below 9.0.5, 8.2.11, and 8.1.14, and Splunk Cloud Platform below version 9.0.2303.100,
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9, 8.1.12, and 9.0.2, an authenticated user can execute arbitrary code through t
When curl < 7.84.0 saves cookies, alt-svc and hsts data to local files, it makes the operation atomic by finalizing the
SQLite 1.0.12 through 3.39.x before 3.39.2 sometimes allows an array-bounds overflow if billions of bytes are used in a
A vulnerability exists in curl <7.87.0 HSTS check that could be bypassed to trick it to keep using HTTP. Rated high seve
When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data t
EUVD-2026-36085
GHSA-73fj-f5qc-x4jf
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB