Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Untrusted archive parsed without entity hardening enables unauthenticated remote DoS (A:H); no confidentiality or integrity impact, matching CWE-776 entity-expansion behavior.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Docling's METS GBS backend is vulnerable to XML Entity Expansion (XXE) attacks thru 2.61.0. The backend extracts and validates XML files from .tar.gz archives using etree.fromstring() without disabling entity resolution. An attacker can craft a malicious XML file with nested entity definitions (XML Bomb) and package it into a .tar.gz archive. When processed by Docling, the exponential expansion of entities during XML parsing leads to excessive resource consumption, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition on the system running the Docling parser.
AnalysisAI
Denial of service in Docling's METS GBS backend (through version 2.61.0) allows remote attackers to exhaust CPU and memory by submitting a malicious .tar.gz archive containing an XML bomb. The backend parses embedded XML with etree.fromstring() while entity resolution remains enabled, so recursively nested entity definitions expand exponentially during parsing and stall or crash the host processing the document. EPSS is very low (0.02%) and there is no public exploit code or KEV listing, but a vendor-published Notion write-up describes the flaw in detail.
Technical ContextAI
Docling is an open-source document-conversion and parsing library widely used in AI/RAG document-ingestion pipelines. The affected component is the METS GBS backend, which handles Google Books-style METS packages delivered as gzip-compressed tar archives and extracts/validates the contained XML using Python's lxml etree.fromstring(). Because the parser is invoked without a hardened configuration (no resolve_entities=False / no_network / DTD-loading disabled), internal entity references are expanded at parse time. This maps to CWE-776 (Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs, i.e. 'XML Entity Expansion' / Billion Laughs). Note that although the report is tagged XXE, the described impact is entity-expansion resource exhaustion rather than external-entity file disclosure or SSRF; no confidentiality or integrity impact is claimed, consistent with the C:N/I:N/A:H CVSS vector.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Docling to a release later than 2.61.0 that hardens the METS GBS XML parsing; no exact fixed version is present in the provided data, so treat patch status as 'fix pending independent confirmation' and verify the fixed tag against the project repository (https://github.com/docling-project/docling) and the vendor write-up (https://www.notion.so/CVE-2026-31248-35d1e1393188818585b2ce3b9ce24686) before deploying. As compensating controls until patched: avoid or disable the METS GBS backend if your pipeline does not need it; validate and reject untrusted .tar.gz/METS uploads before parsing; enforce archive-size and decompression limits and run parsing in a CPU/memory-capped sandbox or container with strict resource ceilings and timeouts so an XML bomb crashes only the worker, not the host; and where you control the parsing call, configure lxml to disable entity resolution and DTD loading (e.g. an XMLParser with resolve_entities=False, no_network=True, load_dtd=False). The trade-offs: disabling the backend removes METS support, size/time limits may reject legitimate large documents, and sandboxing adds operational overhead.
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
Same technique Denial Of Service
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-29095
GHSA-9f4q-q82q-4359