Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low privileges to Threat Response
-
ExploitSubmit crafted input to vulnerable command path
-
ExecutionInject OS command (CWE-78)
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code on host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to Tanium Threat Response plus valid low-privilege authentication (CVSS PR:L), and succeeds only under a high-complexity condition (AC:H) that the vendor advisory does not describe - the specific vulnerable feature, protocol, or configuration is not stated in the available sources. The command-injection trigger path (CWE-78) is not detailed. Limiting factors beyond raw CVSS: the attacker must already possess credentials to the Threat Response console/API, and the AC:H rating implies a non-trivial precondition, both of which reduce realistic exploitability below what the 7.5 network-vector score alone suggests. Confirm affected deployment modes and versions against TAN-2026-095. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and point to a moderate, not emergency, priority. The vendor-supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.5) describes a network-reachable but high-complexity flaw that requires low-privileged authentication (PR:L) and yields full confidentiality, integrity and availability loss consistent with CWE-78 OS command injection leading to code execution. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', below act_now/emergency, so this should be scheduled rather than treated as a fire drill. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS probability was supplied, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified from the input; the only reference is the vendor advisory (TAN-2026-095), which is not verified working exploit code - no public exploit is identified at time of analysis. The vulnerability was self-reported by Tanium rather than discovered through observed attacks. Note the tension between AV:N and AC:H/PR:L: the flaw is remotely reachable but requires both valid low-privilege credentials and a high-complexity condition that the advisory does not describe, which materially narrows the realistic attacker population. EPSS and KEV data are absent (not conflicting), and the precise trigger is undisclosed - verify affected and fixed versions directly against the Tanium advisory. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds low-privilege authenticated access to a Tanium Threat Response deployment supplies crafted input that is passed to an OS command (CWE-78), achieving unauthorized code execution on the affected system. The CVSS AC:H rating indicates the attack is not trivially repeatable and depends on a condition the vendor does not detail. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; the only reference is the vendor advisory. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
An OS command injection flaw in Tanium Threat Response lets a remote attacker who already holds low-privilege credentials execute arbitrary code on the affected system, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N) means the attack is network-reachable but requires valid low-privilege authentication and a high-complexity precondition the vendor advisory does not describe; the specific vulnerable feature, protocol or configuration is not stated in the available sources. Exploitation status is not confirmed - no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not in CISA KEV - and Tanium's own advisory TAN-2026-095 is the authoritative reference for affected versions and fixes.
RemediationAI
The vendor reference for this issue is Tanium's advisory TAN-2026-095 at https://security.tanium.com/TAN-2026-095; the supplied intelligence does not list an exact fixed version or version branch, so the patch level must be taken from that advisory rather than assumed, and upgrading to the build Tanium designates there is the only complete fix. Until the upgrade is applied, the practical exposure reduction follows directly from the assessed vector: because exploitation requires network reachability plus valid low-privilege credentials and a high-complexity precondition, restrict who can reach the Threat Response console and API (network segmentation, allow-listing of management networks, or placing the interface behind a VPN or jump host) and audit/trim Threat Response accounts to the minimum set that genuinely needs them - the trade-off is reduced operational convenience for responders who work remotely, and segmentation must not block the sensor-to-server paths the product depends on. Prior to patching, review Threat Response and underlying host logs for unexpected child-process creation or shell invocations originating from the Threat Response service account, since successful exploitation of a CWE-78 flaw would surface as command execution under that context.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-78, improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, which in Tanium's endpoint-management stack means attacker-influenced input reaching a shell or command-execution path within the Threat Response module rather than being passed as inert data. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:tanium:threat_response:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, so the supplied intelligence does not pin down which Threat Response builds or which deployment modes (on-premises server, cloud-hosted console, or the client-side sensor) carry the flaw. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, scored 7.5: reachability over the network is assumed, but the attacker must already possess low-privilege credentials and must satisfy a high-complexity precondition whose nature - race, timing, configuration dependency or otherwise - is not described in the available sources, and the trigger path for the command injection itself is not detailed. Because the scope is unchanged (S:U), impact is confined to the vulnerable Threat Response component rather than escalating to the broader Tanium platform, though code execution at that layer can still expose the data and response actions the module manages.
Know when Tanium gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable but requires low-privilege authentication (PR:L) and an undisclosed non-trivial precondition (AC:H); command injection yields full code execution, so C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (Tanium).
CVSS VectorVendor: Tanium
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Tanium addressed an unauthorized code execution vulnerability in Threat Response.
Executive ViewAI
Tanium Threat Response contains a high-severity command injection flaw that could allow an authenticated low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code, jeopardizing the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the endpoint security platform itself. Given that Tanium is often deployed with broad visibility and control across the estate, a compromise could undermine security monitoring and response capabilities, affecting the entire organization. Leadership should prioritize validation and mitigation because no vendor patch is currently available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting network access to management interfaces, enforcing strong authentication and least privilege for low-privileged accounts, monitoring for suspicious process creation, and following vendor advisory TAN-2026-095 for configuration workarounds.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
SQL injection in the Tanium Asset module lets an authenticated, high-privilege user read and modify data in the underlyi
Unauthorized OS command execution in Tanium Connect allows an attacker holding low-privilege authenticated access to run
OS command injection in Tanium Connect lets an authenticated, low-privileged user execute arbitrary commands on the unde
Tanium addressed an improper input validation vulnerability in Deploy. [CVSS 8.8 HIGH]
Command injection in Tanium Certificate Manager allows an authenticated attacker with low-level access to execute unauth
Command injection in Tanium Threat Response allows an authenticated low-privilege attacker to execute unauthorized code
SQL injection in Tanium Threat Response (CVSS 3.1 base score 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) allows a low-priv
Path traversal in Tanium Comply allows authenticated low-privileged network users to read files outside the module's int
Path traversal in Tanium Comply exposes all authenticated low-privilege users to a scope-changing arbitrary file write a
SQL injection in Tanium Comply (CWE-89) allows a network-accessible, unauthenticated attacker - contingent on user inter
Improper access controls (CWE-862, Missing Authorization) in Tanium Comply allow an authenticated low-privileged user to
Improper access controls in Tanium Comply allow an authenticated low-privilege user to perform unauthorized operations w
EUVD-2026-116557
GHSA-xj8h-67fr-6272
NVD
CVE.org
Exploit-DB