Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessRun malicious code in sandbox
-
DeliveryPlant/replace workspace symlink to host path
-
ExploitUser initiates sbx cp copy
-
ExecutionCopy follows symlink outside workspace
-
ImpactRead host file or overwrite host path as user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Symlink resolution safety
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires an attacker-controlled (malicious or compromised) Docker Sandbox that shares a workspace with the host and can create or replace a symlink within that workspace, plus a subsequent user-initiated |
| Impact | This is a genuine but conditional local vulnerability, not a remote mass-exploitation threat. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A) describes local exploitation that is low-complexity and needs no host privileges, but requires active user interaction - the victim must initiate an |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A user runs untrusted or AI-agent-driven code inside a Docker Sandbox. That malicious sandbox creates or replaces a symlink inside the shared workspace pointing outside the workspace; when the user later runs |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Symlink following in Docker Sandboxes' sbx cp command allows a malicious sandbox to redirect a user-initiated copy outside the shared workspace, pulling host files into the sandbox or pushing sandbox-controlled content onto host paths with the invoking user's permissions. All releases prior to v0.51.0 are affected (CPE docker:docker_sandboxes:*), and exploitation is conditional: an attacker must already be running code inside a sandbox that shares a workspace with the host, plant a symlink there, and wait for the user to run sbx cp (UI:R, PR:N, AV:L). Impact is high for confidentiality and integrity but bounded by the invoking user's own filesystem permissions; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV entry, and v0.51.0 strengthens workspace-copy and credential protections per the vendor release notes.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Docker Sandboxes v0.51.0 (https://github.com/docker/sbx-releases/releases/tag/v0.51.0), which the release notes describe as strengthening workspace-copy and credential protections; upgrading is the remediation indicated by the vendor. Plan for the release's breaking changes before rolling out: built-in agent names now resolve to published kits at docker.io/sbx/<name>:latest, the kit.allowExtractedAgents setting is removed, and sandboxes created by earlier releases from embedded Claude or Codex specifications must be recreated before sbx kit add, sbx run --model, or sbx move will work - save files and unpushed commits first. The shell agent moves to a published Debian 13 v3 kit that requires registry access on first use, v1 and v2 kits cannot be combined with v3 kits, and custom secrets without destination hosts no longer substitute credentials until explicit destinations are added. Until the upgrade is complete, the practical compensating control is to avoid running untrusted or compromised sandbox content against a workspace that the host later copies from with sbx cp, and to avoid host-side copies from any workspace writable by such a sandbox; the trade-off is reduced sandbox utility, since the workspace sharing and copy workflow is the feature being protected. Text copy from a local sandbox to the host clipboard now also requires opting in via the clipboard.textCopy setting, which limits a related exfiltration channel at the cost of extra configuration.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-59, improper link resolution before file access. Docker Sandboxes share a workspace directory between the host and the sandbox, and the sbx cp subcommand performs host-side copies into or out of that workspace. Because the host-side path is not confined to the workspace tree, a sandbox process that can create or replace a symlink inside the shared workspace can point it at a host location outside the workspace; when the user later initiates a copy, the link is followed and the read or write lands outside the intended boundary. The result is bidirectional: host files can be drawn into the sandbox, and sandbox-authored data can be written to host paths, in both cases with whatever permission the invoking user holds. The advisory does not describe a race condition or memory-safety component; the trigger is the planted link plus the subsequent user copy. The supplied vectors differ in scoring system but agree on substance: the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment is AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (8.4-class severity, unchanged scope), while the CVE record carries a CVSS 4.0 vector with AT:N and no subsequent-system impact (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N), consistent with a flaw bounded by the invoking user's privileges. The vendor's v0.51.0 release notes explicitly group strengthened workspace-copy protections with credential and clipboard hardening, which is where the fix lands.
Know when Docker gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Attacker-controlled sandbox needs no host privileges (PR:N) and acts locally (AV:L), but the victim must trigger the copy (UI:R); symlink abuse yields host read and write, so C/I/A:H.
Primary rating from Vendor (Docker).
CVSS VectorVendor: Docker
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Docker Sandboxes sbx cp does not safely confine host-side paths to a shared workspace. A malicious sandbox can create or replace a workspace symlink so that a later user-initiated copy reads a host file outside the workspace into the sandbox or writes sandbox-controlled data to a host path outside the workspace with the invoking user's permissions.
Executive ViewAI
Docker Sandboxes prior to v0.51.0 contain a symlink-following flaw in the sbx cp command that lets a compromised sandbox redirect copies initiated by a developer, exposing host files to the sandbox or writing sandbox-controlled content onto host paths with the developer's own permissions. Only users running Docker Sandboxes with a shared workspace are affected, and successful abuse requires an attacker who already controls code inside the sandbox plus a user action. Leadership should care because developer endpoints hold source code, credentials, and access to internal repositories, and this flaw erodes the sandbox boundary those endpoints rely on.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations: stop running sbx cp against untrusted or shared sandbox workspaces, avoid sharing workspaces with sandboxes running untrusted code, limit the invoking user's filesystem permissions on developer endpoints, and monitor for anomalous file copies while planning the v0.51.0 upgrade.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl
runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac
Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post
Path traversal in JFrog Artifactory (CWE-22) enables an authenticated low-privilege user to write data outside the inten
Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build
Remote code execution in Gogs through 0.14.2 allows authenticated users (and unauthenticated attackers on default-config
Unauthenticated remote command injection in SGWBOX N3 firmware 2.0.25 lets attackers execute arbitrary operating-system
Remote code execution in Flowise before 3.1.2 allows any authenticated user (or API caller with chatflow view/update per
Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l
Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c
EUVD-2026-116029
NVD
CVE.org
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB