Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as client owner
-
ExploitRepoint client secret to vault entry reference
-
ExecutionRequest client configuration
-
ImpactRead resolved vault secret in plaintext
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a Keycloak deployment configured to use a vault provider (Vault SPI) for storing sensitive values - this is a non-default deployment choice. The attacker must be an authenticated client owner with permission to update their own client's configuration (PR:L); they then set the client secret to a crafted reference pointing at a vault entry and retrieve the client representation to read the value. Limiting factors: no vault provider configured means the flaw is not exploitable, and the attacker needs valid client-owner credentials, so this is not reachable by anonymous/unauthenticated users. No end-user interaction is required. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-priority confidentiality issue rather than an emergency. The input CVSS is 5.3 (medium) and the vendor-supplied vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N shows network reach but gated behind existing low privileges (PR:L - an authenticated client owner) and no availability or integrity impact. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no EPSS score was provided, and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_month', consistent with a real-but-not-urgent fix window. The most important signals are the two hard preconditions: the deployment must actually use a vault provider for secret storage, and the attacker must already be an authenticated client owner - this is a privilege-boundary/information-disclosure problem, not a remote unauthenticated takeover. One discrepancy to note: the vendor rates AC:H, but the described trigger (repoint a client secret at a vault entry, then read the client config) is a straightforward configuration manipulation once the vault provider is in use, which argues for lower attack complexity; the true limiting factor is the environmental precondition, not attack-time complexity. EPSS and POC data are absent - treat exploitation likelihood as unquantified rather than low. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | In a Keycloak / Red Hat build of Keycloak deployment that uses a vault provider to store sensitive values, an authenticated client owner updates their own client's secret to a crafted reference pointing at an arbitrary vault entry, then requests the client configuration/representation and reads the resolved secret in plain text. This exposes credentials the owner was never authorized to see. No public exploit code has been identified for this issue. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 29, 2026
An information disclosure flaw in Keycloak's client registration component lets an authenticated client owner read secrets they should not be able to access when the deployment uses a vault provider (Vault SPI) to store sensitive values. The attacker sets a client's secret to a crafted reference pointing at a vault entry, then retrieves the client configuration and sees the resolved secret in plain text, exposing credentials such as those held in HashiCorp Vault. Exploitation requires a non-default vault integration plus valid client-owner credentials; the issue is rated moderate (CVSS 5.3, C:H with AC:H in the upstream vector, assessed as AC:L), and no public exploit or active exploitation is identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor fixes referenced in the Red Hat advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-117688 and tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2561961; the supplied data does not include an exact fixed version, so the advisory should be checked for the specific Build of Keycloak and Single Sign-On 7 errata before upgrading. As a compensating control where patching must be deferred, remove or disable the vault provider (Vault SPI) configuration from deployments that do not strictly need it, since the flaw is not reachable without a configured vault provider - the trade-off is loss of external secret storage and a return to other secret backends. Additionally, restrict which accounts hold client-owner permissions to update client configuration, and review client secrets stored via vault references for exposure, rotating any credential that may have been read; note that restricting client-owner rights reduces self-service client management.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management server used for SSO, OIDC/SAML federation and client management. Its Vault SPI allows sensitive values - client secrets among them - to be stored externally (for example in HashiCorp Vault) and referenced from configuration using vault expressions rather than plaintext. The flaw is a CWE-200 exposure of sensitive information: the client registration path fails to mask or refuse to resolve a vault reference supplied as a client secret, so when the client representation is returned the resolved secret value is included in plain text. The affected code is the client registration/representation handling in Red Hat Build of Keycloak and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7. The authoritative assessment notes the trigger requires a vault provider to be configured; where no Vault SPI provider is in use, the reference cannot be resolved and the flaw is not exploitable. The upstream CVSS vector marks AC:H while the independent assessment applies AC:L; both agree on AV:N, PR:L, UI:N, S:U and C:H/I:N/A:N.
Know when Red Hat Build Of Keycloak gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Authenticated client owner over the management API gives AV:N/PR:L; the config-manipulation trigger is straightforward so AC:L; only secret disclosure, hence C:H, I:N, A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
A flaw was found in the client registration component of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. When a vault provider is used to store sensitive information, an authenticated client owner can use a specially crafted reference to trick the system into revealing secrets. By updating a client secret to point to a vault entry and then requesting the client configuration, the owner can see the secret value in plain text. This could lead to the exposure of sensitive credentials that the user should not be able to access.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Red Hat Build Of Keycloak
View allAccount takeover in Red Hat Build of Keycloak allows an unauthenticated attacker to abuse the reset-credentials flow in
Account takeover in Keycloak (Red Hat build of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) arises because the IdP-initiated SAML
Authentication bypass in Red Hat Build of Keycloak (and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7) lets an unauthenticated attacker forge
Privilege escalation in Red Hat Build of Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) grants an attacker with low-privil
Mismatched handling of the HTTP/1 absolute-form request authority in Red Hat build of Quarkus and other affected Red Hat
Authorization bypass in the Keycloak Policy Enforcer allows any authenticated user to circumvent all enforced access con
URI normalization bypass in Keycloak's Authorization Services PathMatcher allows authenticated low-privilege users to re
Privilege escalation in Keycloak's Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) component allows attackers with standard user accou
Token exchange in Keycloak bypasses Google Workspace domain allowlist restrictions, enabling any valid Google account ho
Signature-verification bypass in Keycloak (and Red Hat's Keycloak-based products such as Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 and Re
Tenant-restriction bypass in Keycloak's Microsoft identity provider integration allows attackers holding any valid Micro
Session hijacking via SAML assertion replay in Keycloak's SAML broker component allows adjacent-network attackers to aut
EUVD-2026-112638
GHSA-jjgf-8hh9-873m
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB