Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain valid client credentials
-
DeliveryCraft forged JWT assertion (algorithm confusion)
-
ExploitSubmit to JWT Authorization Grant flow
-
ExecutionBypass signature verification
-
PersistMint impersonation access token
-
ImpactAccess resources as federated user / escalate
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to already possess valid client credentials for the Keycloak/RH-SSO deployment (CVSS PR:L) and requires that the JWT Authorization Grant (JWT bearer assertion) client-authentication flow be in use with at least one Identity Provider configured for federated users - that federation linkage is what the impersonation targets. The attack is remote and network-reachable (AV:N), low-complexity (AC:L), and needs no user interaction (UI:N). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: it is NOT unauthenticated - without valid client credentials the forged-assertion path cannot be initiated; and deployments that do not enable the JWT Authorization Grant flow or do not link federated identities are not exposed via this vector. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N, score 8.1) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack requiring some privileges (PR:L - valid client credentials) and no user interaction, with high confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact. The PR:L requirement is the key limiting factor: the attacker must already possess legitimate client credentials, so this is not a fully anonymous internet-wide exploit, which materially reduces the realistic attacker pool versus a PR:N flaw. No EPSS score and no SSVC decision data were provided in the input, so automatability and exploitation-likelihood scoring cannot be quantified here. It is not listed in CISA KEV and no POC was supplied. Net assessment: a genuinely serious authentication-bypass/impersonation bug in a high-value IAM component - worth prioritized patching wherever Keycloak/RH-SSO mediates federated access - but the credentialed precondition and absence of known exploitation place it below drop-everything emergency status. Note: identity-impersonation of 'any federated user' arguably crosses a security authority boundary (a case could be made for scope-changed S:C), yet Red Hat scored S:U; the difference does not change the High rating. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained valid client credentials for a Keycloak/RH-SSO client crafts a JWT client assertion that exploits the algorithm-confusion weakness so that Keycloak accepts a forged signature in the JWT Authorization Grant flow. Using that forged assertion, the attacker obtains access tokens that impersonate arbitrary federated users linked to the Identity Provider, then uses those tokens to reach downstream applications as the victim. No public exploit was identified at time of analysis, and the attack is network-based and low-complexity once valid client credentials are held. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 25, 2026
Signature-verification bypass in Keycloak (and Red Hat's Keycloak-based products such as Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 and Red Hat Build of Keycloak 26.6/26.6.4) lets an attacker holding valid client credentials abuse a JWT algorithm-confusion weakness in the JWT Authorization Grant flow to forge client assertions and mint unauthorized access tokens. The forged tokens allow impersonation of any federated user tied to the affected Identity Provider, yielding unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not on CISA KEV; Red Hat rates it 8.1 (High).
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the fixed packages delivered in Red Hat errata RHSA-2026:30083 (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30083) and RHSA-2026:30084 (https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30084), and consult https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11800 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487006 for the exact fixed versions for your specific product (Red Hat Build of Keycloak, RH-SSO 7, JBoss EAP Expansion Pack, Data Grid 8); no exact upstream fixed version number was provided in the input, so do not assume one. As compensating controls until patching, if the JWT Authorization Grant / JWT bearer client-authentication flow is not required, disable that grant type on affected clients/realms to remove the attack surface (trade-off: breaks any legitimate service-to-service clients relying on JWT-assertion authentication); tighten which clients are permitted to use the JWT grant and rotate/scope client credentials to shrink the set of actors able to attempt the attack; and increase monitoring of token issuance and federated-login events for anomalous impersonation. Note these mitigations do not fix the underlying signature-verification flaw and should be temporary.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Keycloak is a widely used open-source identity and access management (IAM) server providing OAuth 2.0/OIDC and SAML based authentication, federation, and single sign-on. The flaw lives in the JWT Bearer / JWT Authorization Grant (RFC 7523) client-authentication flow, where clients authenticate by presenting a signed JWT assertion. The root cause maps to CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature): an algorithm-confusion condition where the server does not properly bind the verification key to the expected algorithm, allowing an attacker to substitute a signing algorithm/key under their control (the classic JWT 'alg' confusion pattern, e.g. coercing asymmetric RS* verification into a path the attacker can satisfy). The CPE data confirms the affected footprint spans Red Hat Build of Keycloak 26.6 and 26.6.4, Red Hat Single Sign-On 7, the JBoss EAP Expansion Pack, and Red Hat Data Grid 8 (which ships Keycloak/RH-SSO components).
Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network-reachable, low-complexity flow needing valid client credentials (PR:L); forged tokens enable impersonation giving high confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation.
Executive ViewAI
Keycloak and Red Hat Single Sign-On 7 contain a JWT algorithm-confusion vulnerability (CVE-2026-11800, CVSS 8.1) that enables attackers with valid client credentials to forge authentication tokens and impersonate any federated user, bypassing standard authorization controls. This risk threatens the integrity and confidentiality of access management for organizations relying on Keycloak-based identity services, potentially enabling unauthorized access to downstream applications. The vulnerability requires existing credential compromise but poses significant risk of lateral movement and privilege escalation.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce strict JWT algorithm validation and reject unexpected algorithms; implement token signature re-validation in downstream applications; restrict scope and distribution of client credentials; require secondary authorization (MFA or context-based rules) for sensitive federated user operations; maintain detailed audit logs of token issuance and algorithm negotiation; consider network segmentation to limit blast radius from compromised client credentials.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
More in Jwt Attack
View allWhy is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update
Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke
Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,
Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
Security feature bypass in Microsoft .NET (shipped via Visual Studio 2022 17.12/17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.7) lets
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS
The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT
Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a
A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti
A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27
A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work
EUVD-2026-39567
GHSA-gqj5-2xp5-3qmp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB