Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to crafted HTML page
-
ExploitTrigger memory corruption in Scroll
-
ExecutionExecute arbitrary code in renderer sandbox
-
ImpactChain sandbox escape for host impact
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to use an affected Google Chrome desktop build prior to 156.0.8078.47 and to visit or render attacker-controlled HTML content - this user-interaction requirement (UI:R) is the primary limiting factor, as the attack is not self-propagating and needs the target to load a malicious or compromised page. No authentication or special privileges are required (PR:N). Critically, successful exploitation grants code execution only within Chrome's renderer sandbox (per the description), so realistic host compromise additionally depends on chaining a separate sandbox-escape vulnerability; without that, impact is contained to the sandboxed process. No non-default configuration is required. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and must be weighed carefully. The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw needing only that a victim load a crafted HTML page - a classic browser drive-by profile with high technical impact. However, Google's own Chromium rating is only 'Medium', and the description explicitly scopes code execution to 'inside the sandbox,' meaning this bug alone yields renderer-process compromise rather than full host takeover; it would typically need to be chained with a separate sandbox-escape to be weaponized into a true RCE. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or available exploit code at this time. Net assessment: patch promptly as part of normal Chrome update hygiene given the ubiquity and network attack surface, but this is not currently a drop-everything emergency - the Medium Chromium severity, sandbox-limited impact, and absence of exploitation signals argue against the 8.8 score overstating real-world urgency. Note the discrepancy explicitly: the CVSS base score (High/8.8) conflicts with the vendor's Medium severity, likely because CVSS does not model the sandbox containment. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker hosts or compromises a web page containing malicious HTML that triggers the memory-corruption bug in Chrome's Scroll component when a victim visits it. Successful exploitation lets the attacker run arbitrary code within the browser's sandboxed renderer process, which would then need to be combined with a sandbox escape to affect the underlying system. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 21, 2026
Memory corruption in Google Chrome's Scroll component affects desktop builds prior to 156.0.8078.47 and lets a remote, unauthenticated attacker execute arbitrary code inside the renderer sandbox when a victim loads a crafted HTML page. The user-interaction requirement (UI:R) is the main limiting factor: the attack is not self-propagating and depends on the target navigating to malicious or compromised content, after which the injected code runs only within Chrome's sandboxed renderer process - realistic host compromise would additionally require chaining a separate sandbox-escape flaw. The vendor has shipped a fixed build (156.0.8078.47); no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified in the available intelligence at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied to refine the likelihood estimate.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Chrome 156.0.8078.47 - upgrade immediately via Settings > About Chrome, which forces the pending update to download and prompts a relaunch, or through the platform package manager on Linux (for example apt/dnf install of the updated google-chrome-stable); confirm the running build at chrome://version. Enterprise fleets should push the version through Google Update/Chrome Browser Cloud Management policies and verify compliance rather than relying on user-initiated updates, and any organization pinning an older milestone should lift the pin. Details and the full fix list are in the stable channel advisory at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_02018666648.html. Where immediate upgrades are not possible, the practical compensating controls are to keep Chrome's renderer sandbox and site isolation enabled (never launch with --no-sandbox, which converts this Medium-severity renderer bug into host-level code execution), restrict browsing to an allowlisted set of sites via policy or a proxy and block uncategorized domains, and route risky web traffic through a remote browser-isolation or content-disarming gateway - each of these reduces exposure to crafted HTML but adds usability friction and, in the case of remote isolation, latency and compatibility costs. Disabling JavaScript wholesale would block the most common delivery vector but breaks most modern sites and is rarely sustainable.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a classic memory-safety defect (CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer) assigned to Chrome's Scroll component, the Blink/compositor code path that parses layout and drives scroll handling for rendered pages. Because that code processes attacker-supplied HTML/CSS in the renderer process, out-of-bounds reads or writes can be shaped into controlled memory corruption - the tags classify it as RCE/buffer overflow - with the standard browser exploitation pattern of heap grooming followed by control-flow redirection. The assigned vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects low attack complexity and no privilege requirement, offset only by the need to convince a user to open the crafted page; note that Scope is Unchanged, consistent with the description's explicit statement that code execution is confined to Chrome's renderer sandbox (site isolation, seccomp/AppContainer job objects and OS-level mitigations still constrain the payload). Escaping to the host therefore requires a second, independent sandbox-escape vulnerability, which is why Chrome rates the underlying defect Medium despite the 8.8 CVSS. Affected artifacts are Chrome desktop builds below version 156.0.8078.47 as listed by EUVD.
Know when Chrome gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remote crafted page with no auth gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R; code execution confined to the renderer keeps scope unchanged (S:U) with high renderer-process C/I/A impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (google).
CVSS VectorVendor: google
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Memory corruption in Scroll in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Executive ViewAI
Google Chrome desktop builds prior to 156.0.8078.47 contain a high-severity memory-corruption flaw in the Scroll component that could allow code execution inside the browser's renderer sandbox when a user visits crafted web content. The risk is concentrated in employee web browsing rather than server infrastructure, and meaningful host compromise would require an additional sandbox-escape flaw; no public exploit was identified at time of analysis. Leadership should prioritize rapid fleet remediation because Chrome is broadly deployed and user interaction is the primary exposure path.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Use-after-free vulnerability in the DisplayObject class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player
V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.90 for Linux, and 54.0.2840.85 for Android, and 54.0.2840.87 for Windows and Mac
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 59.0.3071.86 for Linux, Windows, and Mac, and 59.0.3071.92 for Android, a
The Array.prototype.concat implementation in builtins.cc in Google V8, as used in Google Chrome before 49.0.2623.108, do
Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.12 and 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderb
Incorrect handling of complex species in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Linux, Windows, and Mac and 57.0.
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 16.0, Firefox ESR 10.x before 10.0.8, Thunderbi
An issue was discovered in the Cisco WebEx Extension before 1.0.7 on Google Chrome, the ActiveTouch General Plugin Conta
The XrayWrapper implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 35.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.32 does not properly interact with
The Chrome Object Wrapper (COW) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbi
The Web IDL implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 28.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.4, Thunderbird before 24.4, and Se
Use-after-free vulnerability in the BitmapData class in the ActionScript 3 (AS3) implementation in Adobe Flash Player 13
EUVD-2026-105515
GHSA-w24x-qhrh-8f36
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB