Skip to main content

Junos OS EUVDEUVD-2026-101448

| CVE-2026-101957 HIGH
Improper Initialization (CWE-665)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-wh22-h2gr-fvpm
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Establish/compromise BGP peering session
  2. Delivery
    Advertise LLGR-stale route update
  3. Exploit
    Route readvertised to non-LLGR peer group
  4. Execution
    Improper initialization triggers rpd fault
  5. Persist
    rpd daemon crashes
  6. Impact
    Routing disruption / device DoS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Proper initialization
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved device to be running BGP with Long-Lived Graceful Restart (LLGR) in a topology where an LLGR-stale route is readvertised to a peer group that is NOT configured for LLGR - this mixed LLGR/non-LLGR peer-group configuration is the specific trigger condition. The attacker must be, or must control, an established BGP peer able to inject the LLGR-stale route update (so there is an implicit adjacency/topology prerequisite despite the PR:N rating). Limiting factors: no impact on devices without BGP configured, without LLGR in use, or without the stale route crossing into a non-LLGR peer group; impact is limited to availability (rpd crash and routing disruption), with no data exposure or code execution.

Impact

This is a genuine high-priority availability issue for networks that run BGP on Juniper gear, but the signals are mixed and should be read carefully. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) scores 8.7 and rates this as network-reachable, low-complexity, and requiring no privileges or user interaction, with the only impact being high availability loss (VA:H / A-equivalent) and a low subsequent-system availability impact (SA:L) reflecting routing disruption - confidentiality and integrity are explicitly N, so this is a pure denial-of-service (CWE-665 Improper Initialization leading to an rpd crash). The PR:N rating is technically correct in that no device credentials are needed, but it understates a real limiting factor: the attacker must be a configured, established BGP peer (or be able to source an LLGR-stale route that reaches the target), so exploitation presupposes an existing BGP adjacency or a compromised/malicious neighbor rather than arbitrary Internet-wide access. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the risk is therefore driven by severity and reachability rather than by observed in-the-wild activity. Net assessment: treat as a real patch priority for BGP-speaking Junos/Junos Evolved deployments (rpd crash can disrupt all routing on the device), but it is not a mass-exploitation or remote-code-execution scenario - it is a conditional, peer-dependent DoS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who controls or has compromised a BGP peer of a vulnerable Junos/Junos OS Evolved router advertises a route carrying an LLGR (Long-Lived Graceful Restart) stale marking. When the receiving router readvertises that LLGR-stale route to a peer group that is not configured for LLGR, improper initialization in rpd triggers a daemon crash, dropping BGP sessions and disrupting routing. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the attacker must already be a BGP peer, so this is low-complexity but peer-dependent.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv3 – Oct 14, 2026

A malformed or misdirected BGP route update can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, taking down the control plane that maintains routing state across the device. The trigger is narrow but fully remote: a Long-Lived Graceful Restart (LLGR) stale route that is readvertised into a peer group that has not negotiated LLGR causes rpd to hit an improper-initialization condition (CWE-665) and abort. Per the CVSS vector the issue is unauthenticated (PR:N) on the network (AV:N) with high availability impact only, but the attacker must control or be an established BGP peer able to inject the stale route, so an existing adjacency is a practical prerequisite. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not confirmed as actively exploited (no CISA KEV listing); Juniper has released fixed software per advisory JSA112187, making this a patch-now availability risk for BGP-running fleets rather than an emergency.

Earlier versions of this analysis (2)
v2 Oct 14, 2026 - 18:17 cvss changed CVSS 8.7

Denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a remote BGP peer to crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) by readvertising an LLGR-stale route to a configured non-LLGR peer group. The assessed vector is network-reachable and unauthenticated at the protocol level (PR:N), but exploitation is bounded to an established BGP adjacency and a specific mix of LLGR and non-LLGR peer-group configuration; this is a credible operational-availability risk rather than a confidentiality or integrity threat. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified in the provided intelligence at time of analysis.

v1 Oct 14, 2026 - 16:46 CVSS 7.5

Denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a remote BGP peer to crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) by readvertising a Long-Lived Graceful Restart (LLGR) stale route into a peer group that is not configured for LLGR. The impact is availability-only (CVSS 3.1 base 7.5, A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity effect: routing on the affected device can be disrupted until rpd restarts. The CVSS vector rates the issue network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N), but exploitation in practice requires an established BGP peering session with a configured neighbor plus a mixed LLGR/non-LLGR peer-group topology, so this is a genuine but bounded denial-of-service issue rather than a top-tier emergency. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) were identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved service release identified in Juniper advisory JSA112187 (https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187) - for Junos OS this means 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3 or 26.2R1-S2 and later, and for Junos OS Evolved the corresponding 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO and 26.2R1-S2-EVO builds, with the special releases patched via 25.4X300-D40-EVO and 25.2X100-D35-EVO. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, the most direct compensating control is to eliminate the trigger topology: remove the LLGR capability from peer groups or, at minimum, ensure that peer groups which could carry renewed LLGR-stale routes are separated from non-LLGR peer groups so stale routes are never re-advertised across that boundary - the trade-off is loss of long-lived graceful restart resilience during peer restarts. Alternatively, disable LLGR entirely (at the cost of faster route withdrawal and potentially longer reconvergence during maintenance), or restrict BGP peering to a tightly controlled set of trusted, explicitly configured neighbors with filtering to drop unexpected re-advertised stale routes; these are mitigating measures only, since they narrow reachability of the trigger rather than fixing the improper initialization in rpd. Monitor rpd core files and unexpected BGP session flaps as an indicator of attempted triggering, and note that no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV entry confirms active exploitation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS 0 <23.2R2-S7.7
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS Evolved 23.4X100
Junos OS Evolved 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.6-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3
Junos OS 24.2 <24.2R2-S5.5
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.11-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 0 <23.2R2-S7.7-EVO
Junos OS 23.4 <23.4R2-S8.13

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 23.2R2-S7.7, 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 23.2R2-S7.7-EVO, 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The affected component is rpd, the routing protocol daemon in Juniper's Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved (CPE cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved), the process that speaks BGP and owns the routing information base. The root cause is class CWE-665, Improper Initialization: when an LLGR-stale route is re-advertised from an LLGR-enabled peer group into a peer group that did not negotiate Long-Lived Graceful Restart (the BGP capability standardized in RFC 9494 as an extension of graceful restart, allowing a restarting speaker's routes to be retained as stale for a much longer period), rpd does not correctly initialize the per-route/per-advertisement state expected on the non-LLGR path. The resulting internal inconsistency leads to a daemon abort rather than any data-integrity or confidentiality consequence: the CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N, VC:N/VI:N/VA:H, SC:N/SI:N/SA:L) and our independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) both converge on a pure availability impact. The decisive environmental factor is configuration, not exploit sophistication: a device must run BGP, must have LLGR in use somewhere, and must have a mixed topology where the stale route crosses into a non-LLGR peer group.

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable rpd crash triggered by a BGP update needing no device credentials (PR:N) or interaction; pure availability loss, so C:N/I:N/A:H and scope unchanged.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

An Improper Initialization vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a remote BGP peer to cause an rpd crash via an LLGR-stale route update readvertised to a configured non-LLGR peer group.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved systems running BGP face a high-severity availability risk: a crafted route update from an established BGP peer can crash the routing protocol daemon and disrupt the control plane that maintains routing state. The flaw is remotely triggerable and unauthenticated per CVSS, but it requires an existing or attacker-controlled BGP adjacency in practice, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Leadership should prioritize patching BGP-running Juniper fleets because a successful trigger could cause routing instability, partner-facing outages, or loss of network availability in production, data center, or WAN environments.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 55% exploitable
Prevalence
High
major vendor; Junos widely deployed in enterprise and carrier BGP networks
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy