Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent network position
-
ExploitSend malformed RSVP signaling packets
-
ExecutionTrigger reachable assertion in rpd daemon
-
ImpactCrash routing daemon causing DoS
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Reachable assertion handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that RSVP signaling be enabled on the target Junos OS / Junos OS Evolved device (typically in MPLS traffic-engineering deployments) - devices without RSVP configured are not affected. The attacker must occupy an adjacent network position (AV:A): same logical/physical link or adjacent L2 segment capable of delivering RSVP signaling to rpd, not arbitrary internet reachability. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N), but the adjacency requirement and the non-default RSVP dependency are the primary limiting factors. Impact is limited to denial of service against the routing daemon; there is no data exposure or code execution. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but bounded operational risk, not a critical priority. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms an adjacent-network, low-complexity, unauthenticated attack with no user interaction - easy to trigger for anyone with the required network position. However, impact is availability-only (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H, SA:L): a routing-daemon crash/DoS with no confidentiality or integrity loss, which caps the vendor score at 7.1 (High). Two factors meaningfully reduce real-world exposure: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), so the attacker must already be on the same L2/adjacent network segment rather than exploiting across the internet, and the vulnerable RSVP signaling must be explicitly enabled (RSVP is used in MPLS/traffic-engineering deployments, not a universal default). No EPSS score, KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no signal of active or imminent exploitation. The vector's R:A (automatic recovery - rpd typically restarts) further limits durable impact to transient routing disruption rather than permanent outage. Net: patch on a normal maintenance cadence for MPLS/RSVP-enabled devices; it does not warrant emergency out-of-band action absent new exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned on a network segment adjacent to a Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved device with RSVP enabled sends malformed RSVP signaling messages to the rpd routing daemon. The malformed input reaches an assertion that causes rpd to crash, disrupting routing/MPLS traffic engineering until the daemon recovers. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires adjacent network access rather than remote internet reachability. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Malformed RSVP signaling can trip a reachable assertion inside the rpd routing daemon on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, terminating the daemon and causing a denial of service on the affected device. The flaw is exploitable without authentication or user interaction by an attacker positioned on an adjacent network segment (CVSS 4.0 base 7.1; AV:A/PR:N/UI:N with high availability impact), but only when RSVP signaling is actually enabled - typically MPLS traffic-engineering deployments - so devices without RSVP configured are not exposed. At time of analysis there is no public exploit identified and no CISA KEV listing; the practical risk is a bounded availability issue against the control plane rather than a confidentiality or integrity compromise, with JSA112187 as the sole authoritative vendor source.
RemediationAI
Juniper's advisory JSA112187 at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187 is the authoritative source for this issue and should be consulted to identify fixed Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved releases covering your platform; no specific fixed version number is confirmed in the available data, so verify the applicable release train directly against the advisory before scheduling maintenance, and note that an rpd restart or device reboot will occur on any crash until the fix is loaded. Where an upgrade cannot be scheduled immediately, the most effective compensating control is to disable RSVP (and RSVP-TE) on interfaces and devices that do not require it, which fully removes the attack surface at the cost of losing MPLS TE signaling and any LSPs dependent on it. For devices that must keep RSVP running, enforce adjacency - apply firewall filters accepting IP protocol 46 (RSVP) only from explicitly trusted neighbor addresses and reject RSVP from transit or untrusted L2 segments - understanding that overly broad filtering will break LSP establishment and RSVP hellos. Log and alert on rpd crashes, core dumps, and unexpected routing-protocol restarts to detect exploitation attempts early, and monitor the vendor advisory for updated affected-release guidance.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-617 (Reachable Assertion) describes a defensive assertion that is legitimately reachable with attacker-influenced input; here the assertion lives in rpd, the Junos routing protocol daemon that hosts the RSVP process used for resource reservation and MPLS traffic-engineering signaling. When rpd parses a crafted RSVP message delivered over the adjacent link, the assertion condition is met and the daemon aborts rather than degrading gracefully, which on Junos means loss of the routing protocols it hosts and a control-plane rather than data-plane failure. The CPE feed identifies the affected code bases as cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved with wildcarded version ranges, and because Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved share the same RSVP/rpd code path, both platforms are covered by the single advisory. The attack surface is deliberately narrow: RSVP is not enabled by default and the vector requires AV:A adjacency plus a configured RSVP control plane, which is why the assessed exploitability (E:X, no confirmed weaponization) remains below the base score's headline value.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
Adjacent unauthenticated attacker (AV:A/PR:N) sends malformed RSVP with low complexity (AC:L); impact is availability-only daemon crash (A:H) with no confidentiality/integrity loss and unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in the rpd routing daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent unauthenticated network attacker to cause a denial of service via malformed RSVP signaling when RSVP is enabled.
Executive ViewAI
Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices with RSVP signaling enabled-typically MPLS traffic-engineering deployments-can be disrupted by a malformed RSVP packet that crashes the rpd routing daemon, causing a denial of service. This unauthenticated adjacent-network attack creates a bounded availability risk to critical routing infrastructure, and no vendor patch is currently available. Leadership should prioritize identifying exposed devices and applying interim mitigations, as no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
Disable RSVP if not needed; restrict RSVP signaling to trusted adjacent devices using ACLs or firewall filters; monitor and automatically restart rpd; follow JSA112187 workarounds.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-101365
GHSA-7v5q-rcj9-pq93
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB