Skip to main content

Juniper Junos OS EUVDEUVD-2026-101352

| CVE-2026-102027 HIGH
Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size (CWE-131)
2026-10-14 juniper GHSA-57x6-37jg-h5f9
8.7
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: juniper
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Establish/compromise eBGP peering session
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE
  3. Exploit
    Trigger incorrect buffer-size calculation in rpd
  4. Execution
    Crash routing protocol daemon
  5. Impact
    Routing/forwarding denial of service

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer size calculation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concrete preconditions stated in the description: (1) the attacker must be a configured eBGP neighbor of the target (an established BGP peering relationship, not arbitrary remote access), and (2) the affected BGP multipath features must be enabled on the router, with the trigger delivered via BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE messages. Limiting factors: routers without BGP multipath enabled, or that peer eBGP only with fully trusted/controlled parties, are not realistically exposed; there is no confidentiality or integrity impact, only an rpd crash (availability). The eBGP-peer requirement is the key mitigant despite the PR:N rating in the vendor CVSS.

Impact

This is a genuine operational-availability risk for Juniper-based networks, but not an indiscriminate internet-wide threat. The vendor-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) with VA:H and subsequent-system SA:L yields 8.7 (High), reflecting a pure denial-of-service impact on the routing protocol daemon with no confidentiality or integrity loss (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). The supplemental metrics are informative: Automatable:Yes (AU:Y) means the triggering UPDATE could be scripted, but Recovery:Automatic (R:A) and the fact that the attacker must already be a configured eBGP neighbor materially constrain real-world exploitability. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation. Note a tension to verify: the CVSS marks PR:N (no privileges), yet the description requires the attacker to be an established eBGP peer AND requires the affected multipath features to be enabled - these are real preconditions that reduce exposure below what PR:N alone implies, so treat this as a priority chiefly for operators who peer eBGP with untrusted/semi-trusted parties and run BGP multipath with labeled-unicast.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker controlling (or who has compromised) a device that is a configured eBGP neighbor of a vulnerable Junos router sends specially crafted BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE messages. On a router where the affected multipath features are enabled, the incorrect buffer-size calculation (CWE-131) triggers an rpd crash, dropping BGP sessions and disrupting routing. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data; the low attack complexity (AC:L) means a validly peered adversary could reproduce the crash reliably.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Malformed BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE messages can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved, producing a denial of service on affected routers (CVSS 8.7). Per the vendor CVSS vector the attack is unauthenticated (PR:N), but exploitation in practice requires two concrete preconditions: the sender must be a configured eBGP neighbor with an established BGP peering session to the target, and the affected BGP multipath features must be enabled on the router, with the trigger arriving as labeled-unicast UPDATEs. Impact is availability only - rpd crashes with no confidentiality or integrity effect - and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so this is primarily an operational-availability risk for Juniper networks that peer eBGP with external or less-trusted parties and run multipath.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so patch status cannot be confirmed from this dataset - Juniper's advisory at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187 should be consulted for the fixed Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved release trains and applied as the primary remediation once the appropriate maintenance release for each platform is published. Until a fix is deployed, the most targeted compensating control is to remove the exposure condition rather than the whole service: disable the affected BGP multipath features on sessions that carry labeled-unicast traffic, accepting the trade-off of reduced path redundancy and load balancing (and possible loss of MPLS/segment-routing reachability where multipath is used for labeled routes) until the device can be upgraded. Where multipath cannot be disabled, restrict labeled-unicast peering to fully trusted, controlled eBGP neighbors and harden the BGP session itself - apply GTSM/TTL-security (e.g. 'ttl 1' on eBGP), TCP-MD5 or TCP-AO authentication for the peering, and an ingress firewall filter that accepts BGP (TCP/179) only from the configured neighbor addresses - which reduces but does not eliminate the risk from a compromised or misbehaving trusted peer, since the crash is triggered by well-formed protocol messages from a legitimate session. Routing-protocol graceful restart and non-stop active routing can shorten the outage caused by an rpd crash but are only recovery measures, not mitigations of the underlying defect, and should be verified as functional before relying on them.

Affected VersionsENISA

Junos OS Evolved 26.2 <26.2R1-S2-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 24.4 <24.4R2-S5-EVO
Junos OS 25.2 <25.2R2-S2
Junos OS Evolved 25.4 <25.4R1-S3-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.4X300 <25.4X300-D40-EVO
Junos OS Evolved 25.2X100 <25.2X100-D35-EVO
Junos OS 26.2 <26.2R1-S2
Junos OS 24.4 <24.4R2-S5
Junos OS Evolved 25.2 <25.2R2-S2-EVO
Junos OS 25.4 <25.4R1-S3

Affected Packages

euvd junos_os fix: 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3, 26.2R1-S2
euvd junos_os_evolved fix: 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.2X100-D35-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO, 25.4X300-D40-EVO, 26.2R1-S2-EVO

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size (CWE-131) inside rpd, the Junos routing protocol daemon that implements BGP and other routing protocols. When the affected BGP multipath features are active, processing of BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE messages causes rpd to compute a buffer size incorrectly, leading to memory corruption that terminates the daemon and disrupts routing on the device. Labeled-unicast is the BGP address family that carries MPLS labels, commonly used for inter-AS and carrier-style MPLS/segment-routing designs, so the vulnerable code path is exercised on networks that exchange labeled routes across eBGP sessions. Juniper's CPE data identifies the affected platforms as junos_os and junos_os_evolved (cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os and cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved), i.e. both the classic FreeBSD-based Junos OS and the Linux-based Junos OS Evolved code lines. The assessed CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) confirms a purely availability-focused outcome with high impact to the daemon; the vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector adds only a low subsequent-system availability impact (SA:L), meaning the crash can ripple to dependent routing/forwarding behavior but is not scored as a confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (juniper) PRIMARY 8.7 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable via BGP with low complexity against an enabled multipath config; attacker is a peer rather than an authenticated principal so PR:N; impact is availability-only (rpd crash).

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L

Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).

CVSS VectorVendor: juniper

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
Low

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Patch available
Oct 14, 2026 - 18:05 EUVD
CVSS changed
Oct 14, 2026 - 17:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.7 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Oct 14, 2026 - 16:48 cve.org
HIGH 8.7

DescriptionCVE.org

An Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a configured eBGP neighbor to cause an rpd crash via BGP labeled-unicast UPDATEs when the affected multipath features are enabled.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A denial-of-service vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows malformed BGP labeled-unicast UPDATE messages to crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd), potentially taking affected routers offline and disrupting network traffic for all services that depend on them. Although the flaw is rated unauthenticated at the protocol level, a successful attack requires the sender to already hold an established eBGP session with the target router and for BGP multipath features to be enabled, which narrows the realistic threat to externally peered routers or untrusted peering relationships. No vendor patch is currently available and no public exploit code has been identified, so leadership should treat this as an operational-availability risk requiring interim hardening and heightened monitoring rather than an imminent compromise risk.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch is available at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: temporarily disable BGP multipath features on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved routers that peer with external or untrusted eBGP neighbors; restrict and monitor which eBGP neighbors are configured on affected routers; apply inbound route filtering and prefix/route limits on untrusted eBGP sessions; monitor for rpd crashes or restarts and BGP session flaps; and engage Juniper support for interim mitigation guidance or a hotfix until a vendor patch is published.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 62% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Junos OS is a widely deployed enterprise and carrier routing platform
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2026-102059 HIGH
8.7 Oct 14

OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u

CVE-2026-101956 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W

CVE-2026-102175 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow

CVE-2026-33792 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices

CVE-2026-101986 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro

CVE-2026-101982 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid

CVE-2026-101990 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas

CVE-2026-33796 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin

CVE-2026-101983 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b

CVE-2026-101954 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno

CVE-2026-101980 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co

CVE-2026-101950 CRITICAL
9.3 Oct 14

Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy