Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessEstablish or abuse adjacent LDP session
-
ExploitSend crafted LDP packet
-
ExecutionTrigger reachable assertion in rpd
-
Impactrpd daemon crashes (routing DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Reachable assertion handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the device to be running LDP (MPLS label distribution) with an already-established LDP session, and the attacker must occupy an adjacent network position able to send LDP packets into that session (AV:A) - i.e., a neighboring or peered router or a host on the LDP peering path. Devices without MPLS/LDP configured are not exposed. Limiting factors: the adjacency requirement (not reachable from arbitrary internet hosts), dependence on a pre-existing LDP session, and the impact being confined to an rpd availability loss (no confidentiality or integrity impact); LDP session protections such as interface restrictions and TCP-AO/MD5 authentication further constrain who can reach the session. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity denial-of-service issue (vendor CVSS 4.0 base 7.1, AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with VA:H and subsequent-availability SA:L), not a code-execution or data-exposure flaw - the only impact is an rpd (routing protocol daemon) crash. Several signals temper the raw score: the attack vector is Adjacent (AV:A), not Network, and exploitation requires an already-established LDP session, so the attacker must be a participating LDP/MPLS peer rather than an arbitrary remote host. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the supplied data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or widespread weaponization; this reads as a real priority for MPLS-enabled service-provider and large-enterprise edge/core routers but a non-issue for devices not running LDP. Note a tension worth flagging: the vendor rates PR:N (unauthenticated), yet the description requires an 'established LDP session,' which in practice implies the attacker already holds an adjacent LDP peering relationship - assess the exposure of your LDP sessions (interface/peer filtering, MD5/TCP-AO authentication) rather than treating this as internet-wide unauthenticated. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned as an adjacent LDP peer (or who can inject into an established LDP session) on an MPLS-enabled Junos device sends a crafted LDP packet that trips a reachable assertion in rpd, crashing the routing protocol daemon and disrupting routing and label distribution. Because the vector is Adjacent (AV:A) with low complexity and no privileges per the vendor vector, a malicious or compromised neighboring router could repeatedly trigger the crash for a sustained DoS. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Adjacent attackers can crash the Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved routing protocol daemon (rpd) by sending a crafted LDP packet into an already-established LDP session, causing a denial of service on the affected router. Only devices running MPLS with LDP enabled and an active LDP peering session are exposed, and the attacker must already hold a position on the adjacent network capable of injecting packets into that session (CVSS 3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N with availability-only impact; vendor CVSS 4.0 base 7.1). There is no confidentiality or integrity impact - the outcome is loss of rpd availability, though repeated crashes can degrade routing stability; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV).
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to the fixed Junos OS build 23.4R2-S8.13, 24.2R2-S5.5, 24.4R2-S5, 25.2R2-S2, 25.4R1-S3 or 26.2R1-S2, or the corresponding Junos OS Evolved builds 23.4R2-S8.11-EVO, 24.2R2-S5.6-EVO, 24.4R2-S5-EVO, 25.2R2-S2-EVO, 25.4R1-S3-EVO or 26.2R1-S2-EVO (with 25.2X100-D35-EVO and 25.4X300-D40-EVO for the X100/X300 trains); see Juniper advisory JSA112187 at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA112187 for the authoritative release matrix. Where immediate upgrades are not possible, compensating controls center on restricting who can reach the LDP session: enable LDP session authentication (TCP-AO or MD5) so an unauthenticated adjacent host cannot inject packets into the established session - noting that a malicious but authenticated peer is not stopped by this control and that key management adds operational overhead; apply interface-level restrictions and ACLs to limit LDP/TCP port 646 traffic to known peer addresses on trusted interfaces, accepting that misconfiguration can break label distribution and MPLS forwarding; disable LDP on interfaces or devices where MPLS label distribution is not required, which removes exposure entirely but forfeits that MPLS capability. None of these workarounds address the underlying assertion defect, so patching remains the durable fix.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 2 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is a Reachable Assertion (CWE-617) in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved. When a crafted Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) packet is received over an established LDP session, the daemon reaches an assertion that should be unreachable and aborts, terminating rpd. LDP is the MPLS signaling protocol used to distribute label bindings between Label Switch Routers; it runs over TCP/646 between LDP peers. Because the vulnerable code path is only entered for packets delivered inside an established LDP session, exploitation presumes both that MPLS/LDP is configured on the device and that a session is already up, and that the attacker is adjacent to the device on the LDP peering path - a neighboring or peered router, or a host with access to that segment. CPE data confirms the affected products are juniper_networks:junos_os and juniper_networks:junos_os_evolved across multiple release trains (23.4, 24.2, 24.4, 25.2, 25.4, 26.2, plus the 23.4X100, 25.2X100 and 25.4X300 extended-release variants). This is an availability-only assertion fault, not a memory-corruption or code-execution primitive.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
Adjacent LDP peer, low complexity, no formal authentication (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N); impact limited to rpd availability so C:N/I:N/A:H with S:U.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A Reachable Assertion vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent attacker to cause an rpd crash via a crafted LDP packet received over an established LDP session.
Executive ViewAI
A single crafted LDP packet sent from an adjacent network position can crash the routing protocol daemon (rpd) on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved devices where MPLS with LDP peering is enabled, taking the router's routing control plane offline until it restarts. Only organizations operating MPLS/LDP-enabled routers with active LDP sessions are exposed, but for those organizations this is a network-availability risk affecting WAN and service-provider edge routing. Repeated crashes could degrade routing stability, so leadership should prioritize confirmable patching and short-term restriction of LDP traffic from untrusted adjacent segments.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-101316
GHSA-w26j-fq69-xhq6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB