Skip to main content

Partition Management Driver EUVDEUVD-2026-100379

| CVE-2026-103553 HIGH
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-jm9h-xwxh-g3fw
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local low-privileged access
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious IOCTL/request to Partition Management Driver
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds kernel read
  4. Execution
    Leak kernel memory to defeat mitigations
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess the ability to execute code locally on the Windows host as an authorized but low-privileged user (PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or network-facing vector. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and no non-default configuration is indicated; the vulnerable Partition Management Driver is a standard in-box Windows component, so default installations are affected. The primary limiting factor is the prerequisite local foothold: an attacker with no access to the machine cannot exploit this directly, which is why it functions as a privilege-escalation building block rather than an initial-access vulnerability.

Impact

This is a credible, patch-worthy local privilege escalation but not an emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) consistently signals a locally-exploitable flaw: the attacker must already have the ability to run code on the host as an authorized (low-privilege) user, after which an out-of-bounds read in the Windows Partition Management Driver can be leveraged toward full compromise. No EPSS score, CISA KEV entry, SSVC decision, or POC indicator was supplied in the input, so there is no positive evidence of real-world exploitation - exploitation status is therefore 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' One internal tension deserves verification: the root weakness is CWE-125 (out-of-bounds READ), which typically yields confidentiality impact (kernel memory disclosure), yet Microsoft's vector asserts I:H and A:H as well. This is plausible for a kernel-driver EoP where leaked memory (e.g., pointers/tokens) is chained to achieve SYSTEM-level code execution, but the high integrity/availability impact is inferred from the EoP framing rather than stated in the terse description - treat the I:H/A:H as vendor-assigned and confirm against the MSRC advisory. Overall priority: moderate - roll into the standard Patch Tuesday cycle; it requires existing local access, which bounds the blast radius absent a chained remote vector.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a standard user account, or a prior foothold) invokes the vulnerable Partition Management Driver through a crafted request, triggering an out-of-bounds read of kernel memory. The leaked data is used to defeat mitigations and escalate from the local user context to SYSTEM. No public exploit code was identified in the provided intelligence, so this remains a theoretical chain pending a POC.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Partition Management Driver lets an already-authorized, low-privileged user who can execute code on the host elevate privileges by triggering an out-of-bounds read against malformed partition-related structures handled by the kernel driver. Microsoft rates it CVSS 7.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) with a CWE-125 root cause, and because the driver is a standard in-box Windows component, default installations are affected with no non-default configuration required. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV; the practical limiter is the prerequisite local foothold, making this a credible, patch-worthy privilege-escalation building block rather than an emergency or an initial-access vector.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update published for this CVE as documented in the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-103553; no exact fix version, KB number, or build string is present in the available data, so confirm the specific patched build and the applicable monthly cumulative update on that advisory before scheduling deployment, and treat patch availability as vendor-advisory-level rather than version-confirmed. Because the flaw is purely local (AV:L) with a low-privilege prerequisite (PR:L), the most effective compensating controls are those that shrink the population of untrusted local users: remove or tightly restrict unnecessary interactive logon and RDP rights on sensitive hosts, and deploy WDAC or AppLocker in enforcement mode to prevent untrusted binaries from running and reaching the driver's parsing paths - with the trade-off that over-restrictive policies can break line-of-business applications and require audit-mode tuning first. Enhanced/Admin-protected security features such as Credential Guard and attack surface reduction rules should be enabled as defense-in-depth, though they raise the bar on post-exploitation rather than blocking the out-of-bounds read itself. Since exploitation requires an existing local foothold and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis, prioritize patching on multi-user, jump-host, and elevated-privilege endpoints and monitor for anomalous partition-management or driver IOCTL activity from low-integrity processes.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in the Windows Partition Management Driver, a kernel-mode component that Windows uses to enumerate, describe, and manage disk partitions and the associated device objects. Root cause class CWE-125 means the driver reads past the end of a buffer it is parsing - typically a caller-supplied structure or partition metadata whose length or index fields are not validated against the actual buffer size - which can disclose adjacent kernel memory to the caller instead of returning a clean error. An information-disclosure primitive of this kind is valuable to an attacker because leaked kernel pointers can defeat ASLR/KASLR and be chained with a separate memory-corruption primitive to obtain reliable code execution at higher integrity; Microsoft nonetheless classifies the net effect as elevation of privilege, consistent with the C:H/I:H/A:H impact triple and scope-unchanged (S:U) vector. The CVSS vector confirms the access profile: AV:L (exploitation requires local execution) and PR:L (a low-privileged, authenticated user is sufficient), with UI:N indicating no victim interaction and AC:L indicating no special timing or race conditions. No CPE strings were supplied in the source data, so affected builds must be enumerated from the Microsoft advisory rather than derived from platform metadata.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local kernel-driver flaw needing an authorized low-privileged foothold (AV:L/PR:L), no interaction or scope change; high impact accepted on the EoP-to-SYSTEM premise, though CWE-125 most directly supports the C:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows Partition Management Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity vulnerability in the standard in-box Windows Partition Management Driver affects default Windows installations and allows an authenticated local low-privileged user to gain high privileges. With no vendor patch currently identified, this creates fleet-wide exposure where a compromised endpoint or user session could escalate to full system compromise, enabling data access, malware deployment, and lateral movement. Leadership should prioritize visibility, least privilege, and rapid patch adoption once Microsoft releases a fix.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include enforcing least privilege, removing unnecessary local admin rights, restricting local interactive logon and code execution, application allowlisting using WDAC or AppLocker, EDR monitoring for privilege escalation or driver abuse, and rapid deployment of the vendor patch once available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core kernel-mode driver shipped in virtually all Windows installations
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy