Skip to main content

Windows Text Shaping EUVDEUVD-2026-100374

| CVE-2026-102225 HIGH
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-rwrf-fc4p-qjq7
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted document or font
  2. Delivery
    Victim opens or renders content
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in text shaping
  4. Execution
    Leverage memory corruption for code execution
  5. Impact
    Run attacker code in user context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to open or render attacker-controlled content (UI:R) - a malicious document, web page, email, or font processed by the Windows Text Shaping component - so it is not wormable or zero-click against default configurations. No authentication is required (PR:N) and the attack is network-deliverable (AV:N), meaning any Windows system that renders untrusted text/font content is in scope; the primary limiting factor is the needed user interaction, with no special non-default configuration indicated.

Impact

This is a credible high-priority issue but not a top-of-queue emergency on current signals. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes network-reachable, unauthenticated code execution with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, tempered only by the required user interaction (UI:R). Notably, the CWE is CWE-125 (out-of-bounds read) and the description says 'execute code over a network' - an OOB read yielding full RCE usually implies the read enables memory disclosure/corruption primitives or ASLR defeat chained to code execution, which is plausible for a font/text-shaping engine but worth noting as a slightly unusual mapping (verify exploitation mechanics with Microsoft). On real-world exploitation signals, there is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active exploitation - the elevated priority rests on severity and ubiquity, not on observed attacks. Net: treat as an important patch-cycle item for a ubiquitous Windows component, but absence of KEV/EPSS/POC means it is a high-CVSS issue without (yet) confirmed real-world exploitation pressure.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious document, web page, or font file containing specially shaped text that triggers the out-of-bounds read in the Windows Text Shaping component when rendered. A victim opens the file or visits the page (UI:R), and the memory-safety flaw is leveraged to execute arbitrary code in the victim's context. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in Windows Text Shaping allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute code on affected Windows systems when a victim opens or renders attacker-controlled content (UI:R), such as a document, web page, email, or font. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, but with a CVSS score of 8.8 and high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, it represents a credible high-priority risk that is not a top-of-queue emergency on current signals.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; monitor the Microsoft MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-102225) for the official fix and apply it as soon as it is available. In the interim, reduce the attack surface by enabling the 'Block untrusted fonts' policy in Windows (Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Mitigation Options > Untrusted Font Blocking), which prevents applications from loading non-system fonts; note that this may break applications that rely on custom fonts, so test compatibility first. Disable font preview in File Explorer (View > Options > View tab > uncheck 'Show preview handlers in preview pane' and 'Display file icon on thumbnails') to avoid automatic rendering of untrusted fonts. For email and web browsing, ensure Microsoft Defender Application Guard or similar sandboxing is enabled, and enforce Protected View in Microsoft Office for documents from untrusted sources. These measures may introduce user friction and compatibility issues but significantly reduce the likelihood of successful exploitation until a patch is released.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the Windows Text Shaping component, which is responsible for processing and rendering text and fonts across the operating system. CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) indicates that the component fails to properly validate the length or boundaries of text/font data, leading to a read past the end of an allocated memory buffer. While out-of-bounds reads typically result in information disclosure, the provided CVSS vector (C:H/I:H/A:H) suggests that the memory corruption may be leveraged to achieve code execution, potentially through subsequent exploitation of leaked memory or by triggering a more severe memory safety violation. Tags associated with this CVE include Buffer Overflow, Information Disclosure, and Microsoft. The attack is network-deliverable (AV:N) and requires no privileges (PR:N), but successful exploitation hinges on user interaction (UI:R) - the victim must open or view malicious content that is processed by the text shaping engine. Microsoft's MSRC update guide is the authoritative source for affected product versions and patch information.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-delivered content rendered by a core OS component with no privileges but requiring the victim to open it (UI:R); successful code execution yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:17 nvd
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows Text Shaping allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity vulnerability (CVE-2026-102225, CVSS 8.8) in Windows Text Shaping enables remote code execution on affected Windows systems when a user opens or renders malicious content, such as a document, web page, email, or font. With no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the risk is still significant due to the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, affecting any organization using Windows endpoints. Leadership should prioritize identifying and mitigating this threat, as successful exploitation could lead to widespread system compromise and data loss.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Based on the described attack vector, interim mitigations include restricting the rendering of untrusted content (e.g., documents, web pages, emails, fonts) and implementing application whitelisting.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 44% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core text-rendering component present in all Windows installations
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy