Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach RPC endpoint over network
-
DeliverySend crafted RPC request
-
ExploitTrigger out-of-bounds write in RPC Runtime
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory and hijack execution
-
PersistExecute arbitrary code on host
-
ImpactFull system compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No special conditions - remote unauthenticated code execution is achievable against default configurations of any affected Windows / Windows Server version wherever the RPC Runtime endpoint is reachable over the network (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). The primary limiting factor is network exposure of RPC: hosts with RPC ports filtered at the perimeter firewall or segmented from untrusted networks are not remotely reachable by external attackers, though internal/lateral exploitation remains possible. No authentication, user interaction, or non-default feature enablement is required; applying the vendor patch (e.g. build 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2 and the corresponding fixed builds per edition) removes the condition. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority vulnerability, not a high-CVSS-but-low-real-risk case. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) describes the most dangerous profile possible: network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated remote code execution with total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with the out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the Windows RPC Runtime. CISA SSVC reinforces this with Automatable:yes and Technical Impact:total, meaning the flaw is suited to reliable, scriptable, wormable-style exploitation against an enormous Windows install base. The one counter-signal is SSVC Exploitation:none and the absence of any KEV listing or public POC in the provided data, so active exploitation is NOT currently confirmed - this is a pre-exploitation, patch-now situation rather than an in-the-wild emergency. No EPSS score was supplied, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be cross-referenced; given the RPC attack surface and historical precedent for RPC Runtime bugs being weaponized, the window between disclosure and exploitation should be treated as short. Overall: treat as critical and patch urgently, but note active exploitation is unconfirmed as of this analysis. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker with network access to a vulnerable Windows host sends specially crafted RPC traffic to the RPC Runtime endpoint, triggering an out-of-bounds write that corrupts memory and leads to arbitrary code execution in the context of the RPC service. No public exploit code was identified at the time of analysis, but the low attack complexity and SSVC 'automatable:yes' assessment indicate a reliable exploit could be built and scaled across exposed hosts. Successful exploitation yields full compromise of the targeted system without any user interaction or prior credentials. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Remote code execution in the Windows RPC Runtime allows an unauthenticated network attacker to run code at the service account's privilege level by triggering an out-of-bounds write in memory handling of RPC traffic. Any supported Windows 10, Windows 11, or Windows Server release that has not been updated to its fixed build is affected - from Windows Server 2012 (6.2.9200.26434) and 2012 R2 through Windows Server 2025 (10.0.26100.33650), plus Windows 10 1607 through 22H2 and Windows 11 23H2 through 26H2 - and the vendor-rated CVSS of 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) reflects that no authentication, user interaction, or special configuration is required beyond RPC reachability. CISA's SSVC assessment rates technical impact as total with exploitation currently 'none', so no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not on the KEV catalog; the practical constraint is network exposure, since hosts with RPC ports filtered at the perimeter or segmented from untrusted networks are not reachable by external attackers even though internal and lateral use remains viable. Patches are available from Microsoft, making this a patch-now priority rather than an emergency zero-day response.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83910 from the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83910 - patch availability is confirmed by the vendor, so upgrade each host to the fixed build for its edition (for example 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2 and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, with equivalent thresholds per edition and branch as listed in the affected-version data); because the runtime is a core OS component, the update requires a reboot and patch-bypass cannot be avoided through application-level changes. Where patching must be staged - such as long-lived terminal servers, OT-adjacent Windows Server 2012/2012 R2 systems that may already be out of mainstream support, or appliances embedding Windows - the most effective compensating control is to block inbound RPC from untrusted networks at the perimeter and on host firewalls: close TCP/135 and the dynamic RPC port range, restrict SMB named-pipe access on TCP/445 that carries RPC, and disable RPC over HTTP, accepting that this breaks legitimate remote administration, MMC snap-ins, Exchange/AD management tools, and distributed applications that rely on those transports. Network segmentation that keeps Windows hosts unreachable by external and low-trust internal clients, combined with EDR rules detecting anomalous rpcrt4-related crashes and unusual RPC endpoint activity, reduces exposure during the patch window; note that these are exposure-reduction measures only and none of them remediate the underlying memory-corruption defect, so patching should still be completed as the primary action. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so there is no confirmed exploit signature to block, but the SSVC 'automatable: yes, technical impact: total' rating means exploit development should be assumed to be trivial once a proof of concept emerges.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) located in the Windows RPC Runtime, the MSRPC/DCE-RPC stack implemented primarily by rpcrt4.dll and the endpoint mapper, which underpins a large share of Windows inter-process and remote management communication. A memory-safety defect of this class occurs when the runtime writes attacker-influenced data past the bounds of an allocated buffer - typically during parsing or unmarshalling of a malformed RPC request - corrupting adjacent heap or stack memory in a way that can be steered into controlled execution rather than a simple crash. Because the flaw sits in shared runtime code rather than a single application, every exposed RPC interface that reaches the affected path is potentially a trigger, and the CPE-style platform list confirms the affected scope spans the Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server families including Server Core installations. The affected build ranges published by EUVD (for example Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711, Windows Server 2025 below 10.0.26100.33650, and Windows Server 2012 R2 below 6.3.9600.23470) map to legacy and modern branches alike, so the defect is not confined to a single servicing baseline. Attackers reach the runtime over the network through exposed RPC transports - TCP/135 and dynamic RPC ports, SMB named pipes on TCP/445, or RPC over HTTP - which is consistent with the AV:N/PR:N/UI:N vector and with the SSVC 'automatable: yes' determination that a wormable or mass-scanning exploit would be feasible if weaponized.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
RPC Runtime is network-reachable without authentication or interaction (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N); an out-of-bounds write yielding RCE justifies AC:L and full C:H/I:H/A:H within the unchanged service scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds write in RPC Runtime allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft Windows RPC Runtime contains a critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability affecting a broad range of Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server deployments. An attacker who can reach RPC services over the network could execute code at the service account's privilege level, enabling lateral movement, data theft, or ransomware; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, but the breadth and potential impact require immediate remediation across the Windows estate. Patch available per vendor advisory, and leadership should prioritize patching because unpatched, network-exposed Windows systems represent a material organizational risk.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-100047
GHSA-cr88-gcpv-fgc4
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB