Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local foothold
-
ExploitInvoke vulnerable Windows Hello component
-
ExecutionRead sensitive system information across privilege boundary
-
ImpactUse disclosed data for further access
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection System info exposure prevention
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated local access with at least low-level privileges (PR:L) on a system running an affected Windows 10 or Windows 11 build with Windows Hello present, and to interact locally with the Windows Hello component (AV:L); no user interaction from a victim is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the flaw is not remotely reachable, cannot be triggered without an existing local privileged foothold, is rated not automatable by SSVC, and yields only information disclosure (no code execution, modification, or denial of service). Patched builds are available from Microsoft (fixed at 10.0.19044.7807 / 19045.7807 for Win10, and the 9711/7652/3231 build floors for the respective Win11 versions), so patched systems are not exposed. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but comparatively low-priority issue rather than an urgent one. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) describes a local, low-complexity attack that requires the attacker to already hold low-level privileges (PR:L) on the machine; impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H) with no integrity or availability effect. These raw metrics align well with the SSVC decision framework, which reports Exploitation: none, Automatable: no, and Technical Impact: partial - all three point to a flaw that is neither remotely reachable nor scalable. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' EPSS is not provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. The signals are internally consistent (local + privilege-required + not automatable + no known exploitation all reinforce 'bounded, hands-on-keyboard risk'), so there is no conflict to flag; the main caveat is simply that an EPSS score is absent. Overall: a real local information-disclosure defect worth patching in routine cycles, not an emergency. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged local account or foothold on a Windows endpoint invokes the vulnerable Windows Hello component and reads sensitive system information that should have been restricted to a higher privilege sphere. Because the vector is local and requires existing privileges with no user interaction, this is most plausible as a post-compromise privilege/information-gathering step rather than an initial intrusion. No public proof-of-concept is identified in the provided data. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local information disclosure in Microsoft Windows Hello allows an attacker who already holds low-privileged authenticated access on a Windows 10 or Windows 11 host to read sensitive system data that should be outside their control sphere. Exploitation requires local interactive access (AV:L, PR:L), involves no victim user interaction (UI:N), and yields only confidentiality impact - no code execution, tampering, or denial of service - which is why our assessment rates this a genuine but comparatively low-priority issue rather than an urgent one. There is no evidence of active exploitation (not in CISA KEV), no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, SSVC rates it not automatable, and Microsoft has released fixed build floors for every affected branch.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft update that moves each branch to or above its fixed build - Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807 / 10.0.19045.7807, and Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, and 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711 - following the guidance at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83907 and prioritising hosts where untrusted or shared local accounts exist. Because exploitation already presupposes local low-privileged code execution, the highest-value compensating control is reducing that precondition: enforce least privilege so standard users cannot run arbitrary binaries, and remove or tightly scope local interactive logon for non-administrative service and kiosk accounts (trade-off: reduced operational flexibility for shared-workstation and lab scenarios, and some automated workflows may need dedicated service accounts instead of interactive sessions). Where Windows Hello is not operationally required, disabling the Windows Hello for Business credential provider through Group Policy removes the exposed component entirely (trade-off: users lose PIN and biometric convenience sign-in). Application allow-listing via WDAC or AppLocker can block unknown local binaries that would attempt to query the Hello data stores (trade-off: significant deployment and maintenance overhead plus risk of blocking legitimate software). Network isolation does not help here since the vector is strictly local (AV:L) - effort is better spent on host privilege hygiene than on perimeter filtering.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 7 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
This is a Windows Hello component flaw falling under CWE-497 (Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere), meaning a caller operating under a lower privilege context can obtain data that Windows Hello intends to keep restricted to a higher-privilege boundary. Windows Hello is the Windows authentication framework that backs PIN, fingerprint, and facial-recognition sign-in and stores credential material (for example NGC key containers and associated data) protected per-user and increasingly bound to TPM hardware. Because the CVSS vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, the defect is only reachable from local code already executing on the machine, requires only low privileges, needs no social-engineering step against a victim, and is scoped to a single security authority so no privilege boundary is crossed beyond the confidentiality leak. The complete absence of an Integrity or Availability metric confirms this is a disclosure-only issue rather than a credential-substitution or authentication-bypass primitive. Affected builds identified via EUVD span Windows 10 21H2 and 22H2 (10.0.19044.x / 10.0.19045.x) and Windows 11 23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, and 26H2 (10.0.22631.7652, 10.0.26100.9711, 10.0.26200.9711, 10.0.28000.3231, 10.0.26300.9711 floors respectively); no CPE strings were supplied in the source data, so version identification here rests on the EUVD build ranges and the Microsoft Security Response Center advisory.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local component access with an existing low-privileged account (AV:L, PR:L), no user interaction, and confidentiality-only impact (C:H, I:N, A:N) as it discloses sensitive system information.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere in Windows Hello allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-100044
GHSA-mpqg-rv6w-426x
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB