Skip to main content

Windows Event Log EUVDEUVD-2026-100015

| CVE-2026-83856 HIGH
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-fw5f-5j4p-c43m
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Deliver crafted event data over network
  2. Delivery
    Induce user interaction to process it
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in Event Logging Service
  4. Execution
    Leverage memory corruption toward code execution
  5. Impact
    Compromise host confidentiality, integrity, availability

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires attacker-influenced data to reach the Windows Event Logging Service and requires user interaction (UI:R) plus a hard-to-meet runtime/memory condition (AC:H) to trigger the out-of-bounds read in CWE-125; it is unauthenticated (PR:N) and network-reachable (AV:N) against affected builds. Limiting factors that reduce realistic risk: mandatory user interaction, the high-complexity precondition (specific timing or memory layout rather than a deterministic single request), and that only unpatched builds are affected - Windows 11 23H2 (<10.0.22631.7652), 24H2/25H2 (<10.0.26100.9711 / <10.0.26200.9711), 26H1 (<10.0.28000.3231), 26H2 (<10.0.26300.9711), Windows Server 2022 (<10.0.20348.5761) and Server 2025 (<10.0.26100.33650). The input does not name a specific non-default feature toggle; the gating conditions are the complexity and interaction requirements.

Impact

Signals conflict and should temper prioritization despite the 7.5 (HIGH) score. The CVSS vector is network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N) with total impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), but it is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R), which materially lowers real-world exploitability. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower-urgency posture: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=total - i.e., severe if achieved but not currently exploited and not mass-scannable/wormable. There is no KEV listing and no identified public exploit code, and no EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. Note a classification tension: CWE-125 (out-of-bounds READ) and the 'Information Disclosure' tag imply a memory-disclosure primitive, yet both the description and the C:H/I:H/A:H impact assert 'execute code over a network' - an OOB read alone rarely yields direct RCE, so the code-execution claim likely depends on chaining or memory-layout conditions; verify the exploitation mechanism with Microsoft (MSRC). Overall: a patch-soon, not drop-everything, item - genuine total-impact potential but blunted by AC:H + UI:R and no current exploitation evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker lures a user into an action that causes the Windows Event Logging Service to parse attacker-influenced event data, triggering an out-of-bounds read that is leveraged toward code execution. Because the CVSS vector specifies high complexity (AC:H) and user interaction (UI:R), the attacker must win specific timing/memory conditions and rely on victim participation, making opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

An out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in the Windows Event Logging Service can be driven by network-supplied input to corrupt execution flow, with the vendor rating confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact as High (CVSS 7.5). Affected are unpatched Windows 11 builds (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2) and Windows Server 2022 and 2025, including Server Core installations; exploitation is unauthenticated and network-reachable (PR:N/AV:N) but requires user interaction (UI:R) and a hard-to-satisfy timing or memory-layout condition (AC:H), so realistic risk is materially lower than the base score suggests. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records no exploitation activity, and a vendor patch is available from Microsoft.

RemediationAI

Patch status is vendor-released: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-83856 from the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83856), which moves each affected line to or above the fixed builds enumerated in the advisory data - Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) to 10.0.26100.33650. Because exploitation is not confirmed and requires user interaction plus a high-complexity memory condition, patch deployment can be scheduled on a standard cycle for internet-facing systems while prioritizing hosts that accept remote or forwarded event-log traffic; where immediate patching is not possible, reduce the attack surface by restricting who can submit or forward events to the Event Logging Service, tightening inbound RPC/WEF (Windows Event Forwarding) and WinRM access so only trusted collectors reach the service, and disabling or narrowing event-forwarding subscriptions on hosts that do not require them - accepting the trade-off that this degrades centralized log collection and can blind SOC monitoring. Host-based controls such as Exploit Protection (CFG, EAF/IAF on the event-logging process) and restricting interactive sessions that could satisfy the UI:R requirement offer marginal benefit against an AC:H bug and should not be treated as substitutes for the vendor update. No public exploit code is known, so no emergency detection-rule deployment is implied beyond monitoring for anomalous Event Logging Service crashes or unexpected process termination.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 8 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic out-of-bounds read in CWE-125 affecting the Windows Event Logging Service, the component that ingests, buffers, and persists Windows event records (including remotely forwarded and API- or network-supplied records) into the EVTX store. An insufficiently validated length or index derived from attacker-influenced event data causes the service to read past the end of an allocated buffer, which the vendor assesses as enabling code execution over a network rather than only information disclosure - an unusual severity assignment for a read primitive and a signal that the underlying parse path can be steered into unsafe memory state. Consistent with the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, the attack path is network-reachable and unauthenticated (PR:N) but gated by mandatory user interaction (UI:R) plus a high-complexity precondition (AC:H) such as a specific memory layout or race window rather than a deterministic single request. CISA's SSVC entry rates exploitation as none and automability as no, while assigning technical impact of total; ENISA's EUVD entry (EUVD-2026-100015) tracks the same Microsoft advisory and enumerates the affected Windows builds and their patch boundaries. The input does not name a specific non-default feature toggle to disable, so the practical gating conditions remain the interaction and complexity requirements plus the unpatched build state.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N) but gated by user interaction (UI:R) and non-deterministic memory conditions (AC:H); full impact retained per vendor's code-execution claim.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows Event Logging Service allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity memory-safety flaw in the Windows Event Logging Service affects unpatched Windows 11 endpoints (23H2 through 26H2) and Windows Server 2022/2025, including Server Core, meaning the majority of our managed Windows estate is potentially in scope. While the service is network-reachable without authentication, successful abuse requires a user to take an action and to hit a difficult timing or memory-layout condition, so the practical likelihood of a damaging incident is materially lower than the headline score implies. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no recorded exploitation activity, so leadership should treat this as a disciplined, schedule-driven patching obligation rather than an emergency.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows 11 and Windows Server component in most enterprise environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy