Skip to main content

HCL IntelliOps IEM EUVDEUVD-2025-210752

| CVE-2025-62300 MEDIUM
Race Condition (CWE-362)
2026-08-20 HCL GHSA-f794-hwj5-wch8
5.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: HCL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify IEM network endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Craft concurrent resource-targeting requests
  3. Exploit
    Submit requests within race timing window
  4. Execution
    Win synchronization gap
  5. Persist
    Overwrite or corrupt shared resource
  6. Impact
    Cause integrity violation or unpredictable system behavior

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N indicates the vulnerability is reachable over the network without any authentication or user interaction, but successful exploitation requires winning a precise race condition timing window - an environment-dependent constraint that is not reliably achievable through a single request or basic automated scanning. The vendor description identifies the 'timing window' as the core mechanism: an attacker must interpose concurrent resource-modifying operations within a narrow execution window on the server side. No specific non-default feature, configuration flag, or deployment mode is identified as a prerequisite in available data. Limiting factors include the high attack complexity, which demands repeated attempts or environmental reconnaissance to identify and reliably hit the race window, and the absence of any known public exploit or proof-of-concept that would lower this bar. The PR:N metric confirms no account credentials constrain access, meaning the race complexity itself is the primary practical barrier.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.9 (Medium) captures the tension between a high integrity impact (I:H) and high attack complexity (AC:H), the latter of which substantially constrains real-world exploitability - winning a race condition reliably requires precise timing, repeated attempts, or environmental knowledge, none of which are trivial to automate at scale. The network attack vector (AV:N) combined with no required privileges (PR:N) and no user interaction (UI:N) widens the theoretical attack surface, but the AC:H constraint means this is not a candidate for mass or worm-style exploitation. No EPSS score was available in the provided intelligence, the CVE does not appear in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code has been identified, all of which are consistent with the medium-severity, high-complexity profile. A notable discrepancy exists between the 'Information Disclosure' tag in the source data and the CVSS confidentiality metric of C:N; this conflict is unresolved and should be verified directly against the HCL KB0132456 advisory before concluding that no confidentiality exposure exists. Overall, this vulnerability poses a moderate, targeted risk rather than an imminent mass-exploitation threat, and prioritization should be guided by whether IEM interfaces are exposed beyond trusted internal network segments.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network access to an IEM instance submits carefully timed concurrent requests that both attempt to operate on the same shared resource within the event management pipeline. By winning the race condition - interposing a resource modification between the check and use phases of the legitimate operation - the attacker corrupts or overwrites the resource state, potentially altering event records, escalating event priority, or suppressing alerts. No public exploit code is known, and the AC:H rating indicates that repeated, carefully timed attempts are required rather than a single deterministic request.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 20, 2026

Race condition (CWE-362) in HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) exposes a timing window that a remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit to modify shared resources, producing high integrity impact. The CVSS 3.1 score of 5.9 reflects the offsetting effect of high attack complexity (AC:H), which limits opportunistic exploitation to adversaries capable of precise timing control. No active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is known at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the fix referenced in HCL Software knowledge base article KB0132456, available at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0132456. No specific patched version number is independently confirmed from available intelligence - the fix is described as available per vendor advisory only, so organizations should contact HCL support to confirm the exact target version for their deployment. As a compensating control while patching is scheduled, restrict network-layer access to IEM management interfaces so that only trusted internal hosts or authenticated proxy services can reach them, reducing the pool of potential attackers who could attempt to trigger the race condition; note that this does not eliminate risk if IEM is accessible from any untrusted internal segment. Additionally, enabling verbose audit logging for resource modification operations within IEM can provide detection telemetry for anomalous concurrent access patterns indicative of exploitation attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

IEM v1.4.0

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is an enterprise IT operations and event management platform produced by HCL Software. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-362 (Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization), the standard category for race conditions including TOCTOU (Time-Of-Check-Time-Of-Use) flaws. This class of defect arises when two or more concurrent code paths access a shared resource without adequate synchronization primitives - such as mutexes, semaphores, or atomic operations - leaving a window during which an external actor can interpose and alter resource state before the original operation completes. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:hcl_software:iem:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version field, indicating NVD has not bounded the affected version range and all tracked IEM releases should be treated as potentially vulnerable until a vendor-confirmed fixed version is established.

Know when Iem gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (HCL) PRIMARY 5.9 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

AV:N is consistent with a networked event management platform; AC:H reflects race timing requirement; PR:N per absence of any auth prerequisite in description; I:H from explicit resource modification impact; C:N and A:N per description scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (HCL).

CVSS VectorVendor: HCL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is affected by a race condition. A "timing window" can occur where an attacker can modify the resource causing unpredictable behavior.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
enterprise IT operations platform, limited cross-industry deployment
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

30
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +30
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy