Skip to main content

Quest NetVault Backup CVE-2026-9781

| EUVDEUVD-2026-39141 HIGH
SQL Injection (CWE-89)
2026-06-25 zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com GHSA-fv4p-f98h-cj9r
8.8
CVSS 3.0 · Vendor: trendmicro
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach NetVault JSON-RPC service over network
  2. Delivery
    Bypass authentication mechanism
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted NVBURASDevice message
  4. Execution
    Inject SQL into backend query
  5. Persist
    Execute code as NETWORK SERVICE
  6. Impact
    Compromise backup server

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Parameterized queries, prepared statements
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Persistence

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the NetVault Backup NVBURASDevice JSON-RPC service endpoint. Authentication is nominally required (CVSS PR:L), but the advisory states the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed, which removes valid credentials as a meaningful barrier. No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L). The main limiting factors are that the attacker must be able to send JSON-RPC traffic to the specific NVBURASDevice listener (so network exposure of the backup management service is the key gating condition) and that the target must be a vulnerable, unpatched build running the NETWORK SERVICE-context backend (consistent with a Windows deployment).

Impact

The CVSS 3.0 base score is 8.8 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - network-reachable, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The PR:L rating reflects that authentication is normally required, but the advisory explicitly states the authentication mechanism can be bypassed, which in practice pushes real-world exploitability closer to unauthenticated and argues for prioritized patching. EPSS data was not provided, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active exploitation; combined with no identified public exploit, this currently reads as a high-severity but not-yet-weaponized issue. The primary risk driver is the combination of an auth bypass plus RCE on a backup server - a high-value target - rather than confirmed in-the-wild activity.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach the NetVault Backup server over the network leverages the authentication bypass to submit a crafted NVBURASDevice JSON-RPC message containing a malicious SQL payload. The injection is processed by the backend database and abused to execute arbitrary commands, giving the attacker code execution as NETWORK SERVICE on the backup host. No public proof-of-concept is identified at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity makes reliable exploitation plausible once details are known.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 25, 2026

Remote code execution in Quest NetVault Backup arises from SQL injection in the NVBURASDevice JSON-RPC message handler, where attacker-controlled input is concatenated into SQL queries. Although authentication is nominally required, ZDI notes the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed, so attackers can reach the vulnerable endpoint and execute code in the NETWORK SERVICE context. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV; it was reported privately via Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI-26-370 / ZDI-CAN-27648).

RemediationAI

Upgrade to the patched NetVault Backup release referenced in the Quest 14.0.2 release notes (https://support.quest.com/technical-documents/netvault/14.0.2/release-notes#TOPIC-2338529); treat 14.0.2 as the fixed version per the vendor reference, and cross-check the ZDI advisory (https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-370/). The exact fix build is not independently restated in the input data, so verify the specific patched version in the release notes before deploying. Where immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the NetVault management/JSON-RPC service so that only trusted backup-administration hosts can reach it (network segmentation or host firewall rules on the NVBURASDevice listener), accepting that this can disrupt legitimate distributed backup clients or remote consoles that depend on that port; monitor the service for anomalous JSON-RPC requests as a detective control. Because authentication can be bypassed, do not rely on credential controls alone as a mitigation.

Affected VersionsENISA

NetVault Backup 14.0.0.19

Affected Packages

euvd netvault_backup no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

NetVault Backup is an enterprise data-protection/backup product whose components communicate over JSON-RPC. The flaw lives in the NVBURASDevice service, which processes JSON-RPC messages and takes a user-supplied string and uses it to build a SQL query without proper validation or parameterization - a classic CWE-89 (SQL Injection). Because the underlying database engine and service privileges allow command execution paths, the injection is escalated from data tampering into full code execution running as the Windows NETWORK SERVICE account, indicating a Windows deployment of the backup server backend.

Know when Netvault Backup gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (trendmicro) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-facing JSON-RPC service with low-complexity SQLi yielding RCE as NETWORK SERVICE; PR:L reflects nominal auth, kept despite documented bypass, with full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (trendmicro).

CVSS VectorVendor: trendmicro

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Quest NetVault Backup NVBURASDevice SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Quest NetVault Backup. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.

The specific flaw exists within the processing of NVBURASDevice JSON-RPC messages. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to construct SQL queries. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of NETWORK SERVICE. Was ZDI-CAN-27648.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Quest NetVault Backup contains a remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-9781, CVSS 8.8) in its JSON-RPC message handler due to SQL injection, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code within the backup service context; this directly threatens backup data integrity and creates a foothold for lateral movement into protected systems and sensitive infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict network access to NetVault Backup JSON-RPC endpoints using firewall rules or network segmentation; (2) disable JSON-RPC message handler if not required for operations; (3) deploy real-time monitoring of backup service database queries and NETWORK SERVICE process execution for exploitation indicators; (4) implement enhanced authentication logging to detect bypass attempts; (5) isolate backup infrastructure on network segments with restricted egress until patch availability is confirmed.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
established enterprise backup product, common but not ubiquitous in IT environments
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

SQL injection exploits the way applications construct database queries by mixing user input directly into SQL statements.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy