Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6428NS CVE-2026-9295

| EUVDEUVD-2026-31528 HIGH
Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)
2026-05-23 VulDB GHSA-qc2w-vjr4-c222
7.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Identify exposed BR-6428NS admin interface
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate with valid or default credentials
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted POST to /goform/formWirelessTbl with oversized vapurl
  4. Install
    Overflow fixed-size buffer in handler
  5. C2
    Hijack control flow on router
  6. Execute
    Persist via firmware/config tampering
  7. Impact
    Intercept and redirect LAN traffic

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer copy size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the BR-6428NS web administration interface (typically TCP 80 on the LAN, or WAN if remote administration is enabled) and an authenticated administrative session, as indicated by CVSS PR:L - the attacker must be able to issue authenticated POST requests to /goform/formWirelessTbl. The specific trigger is supplying an oversized value in the vapurl POST parameter to the formWirelessTbl handler. Limiting factors: the attacker needs valid admin credentials (commonly defeated on consumer routers through default-credential reuse or LAN-side access), and the device must be running firmware version 1.10. No user interaction is required, and exploitation works against the device's default web stack without any non-default configuration.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) indicates network-reachable exploitation with low complexity, requiring low privileges (PR:L - typically an authenticated session) and no user interaction, with high impact across CIA. The E:P/RC:R temporal extensions indicate a proof-of-concept exploit with reasonable reporting confidence, consistent with the publicly released writeup. No EPSS score was provided in the input, and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, so there is no confirmed evidence of in-the-wild exploitation; however, publicly available exploit code exists, which materially raises opportunistic risk. PR:L conflicts somewhat with consumer router reality - many BR-6428NS units are deployed with default or weak admin credentials, effectively lowering the practical authentication barrier. The vendor's non-response to disclosure means no patch coordination is occurring, which substantially elevates long-term risk for any internet-exposed device.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained or guessed admin credentials (or who reaches the device on a network where the admin panel is exposed) sends a crafted POST request to /goform/formWirelessTbl containing an oversized vapurl parameter, overflowing a fixed-size buffer in the handler. Because a public PoC exists in the referenced Notion writeup, the technical barrier to weaponization is low. Successful exploitation crashes the device or, with proper payload construction, executes attacker-controlled code on the router, giving full control over routed traffic and the local network.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – May 23, 2026

Buffer overflow in the Edimax BR-6428NS 1.10 router's web management interface allows authenticated remote attackers to corrupt memory by submitting a crafted vapurl parameter to the formWirelessTbl POST handler at /goform/formWirelessTbl. Publicly available exploit code exists (released via VulDB and a Notion writeup), and the vendor has not responded to coordinated disclosure attempts. The flaw is not currently listed in CISA KEV, but the combination of public PoC, low attack complexity, and an unpatched/unresponsive vendor makes this a tangible risk for any exposed device.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - Edimax did not respond to the disclosure, and the BR-6428NS is a legacy/likely end-of-life device, so users should plan for hardware replacement with a currently supported router as the durable fix. As compensating controls until replacement, disable remote/WAN-side administration on the device (admin console should be reachable only from a trusted LAN segment), enforce a strong unique admin password to raise the bar against the PR:L precondition, and place the router's management interface behind a firewall rule blocking inbound TCP to the HTTP admin port from untrusted networks; the trade-off is loss of remote management convenience. Monitor the VulDB entry at https://vuldb.com/vuln/365242 for any updated vendor response, and segment the device away from sensitive internal networks since a compromised router enables pivoting, DNS tampering, and traffic interception.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6428NS 1.10

Affected Packages

euvd br_6428ns no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Edimax BR-6428NS is a consumer-grade SOHO wireless router whose web administration interface is served by an embedded HTTP daemon (goform-based handlers, typical of Realtek/Edimax firmware). The vulnerable code path is the formWirelessTbl handler under /goform/, which processes wireless table updates from POST requests. The root cause is CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow / Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input): the vapurl POST parameter is copied into a fixed-size stack or BSS buffer without bounds validation, allowing oversized input to overwrite adjacent memory. On MIPS/ARM SOHO devices of this class, such overflows typically lead to control-flow hijack or device crash. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:edimax:br-6428ns:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* with version 1.10 explicitly named.

Know when Br 6428Ns gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 7.4 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 19:37 NVD
8.8 (HIGH) 7.4 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6428NS 1.10. This affects the function formWirelessTbl of the file /goform/formWirelessTbl of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument vapurl results in buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Organizations operating Edimax BR-6428NS routers (firmware v1.10) face immediate risk from an unpatched buffer overflow vulnerability in the management interface where publicly available exploit code exists; this vulnerability will persist indefinitely without vendor remediation. Compromised routers could lead to network disruption and unauthorized access through critical infrastructure. All affected devices require urgent remediation or replacement planning.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Implement network access controls: restrict management interface to trusted networks only via firewall ACLs, disable remote management if not operationally required, enforce VPN or authenticated jump-box access for all administrative functions, implement strong authentication policies, and enable detailed logging and monitoring of management interface access. Expedite equipment replacement planning as primary mitigation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 97% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

57
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +37
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy