Skip to main content

Edimax BR-6428NS CVE-2026-8776

| EUVDEUVD-2026-30720 HIGH
Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120)
2026-05-18 VulDB GHSA-cc9m-6hq9-85vh
7.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed BR-6428NS web UI
  2. Delivery
    Obtain admin credentials (default/weak/CSRF)
  3. Exploit
    Send POST to /goform/formPPTPSetup with oversized pptpUserName
  4. Execution
    Overflow stack buffer in httpd
  5. Persist
    Hijack control flow or crash service
  6. Impact
    Execute code or persist on router

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer copy size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) network reachability to the device's HTTP management interface - typically the LAN side by default, but a serious risk on any unit configured for WAN/remote administration; (2) valid authenticated credentials to the admin web UI (CVSS PR:L), which on consumer devices often means default or weak credentials are sufficient; and (3) the ability to send an HTTP POST to /goform/formPPTPSetup with an oversized pptpUserName argument. No user interaction is required (UI:N). Limiting factors: the PR:L authentication requirement narrows the attack surface compared to a fully unauthenticated bug, and devices not exposing the web UI to the WAN are only reachable from the local network or via CSRF against an authenticated administrator.

Impact

CVSS 4.0 scores this 7.4 (High) with vector AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H - network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring low privileges (PR:L), meaning an authenticated session to the web UI is needed. E:P confirms a proof-of-concept exists. No EPSS score or CISA KEV listing was provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis indicating mass exploitation, but publicly available exploit code exists which lowers the barrier for opportunistic attacks, particularly against devices exposed to the internet or where default/weak admin credentials are in use. The real-world risk is amplified by the vendor's confirmed non-response, meaning no patch is forthcoming and affected devices will remain vulnerable indefinitely; this is more dangerous in practice than the 7.4 score suggests for any device still in production.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained or guessed the router's admin credentials (or reaches a session via CSRF against a logged-in administrator) sends a crafted HTTP POST to /goform/formPPTPSetup with an overlong pptpUserName field, overflowing a stack buffer in the httpd process. Per the published exploit writeup on Notion, the overflow is reachable and reproducible, enabling at minimum a remote crash/DoS of the management daemon and potentially code execution in the httpd context depending on the firmware's memory protections.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – May 18, 2026

Stack buffer overflow in the Edimax BR-6428NS router (firmware 1.10) allows remote authenticated attackers to corrupt memory by sending an overlong pptpUserName parameter to the /goform/formPPTPSetup endpoint. Publicly available exploit code exists per VulDB disclosure, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis in CISA KEV. The vendor was reportedly contacted prior to disclosure but did not respond, leaving the device line without a confirmed fix.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 May 18, 2026 - 01:43 CVSS 8.8

Buffer overflow in Edimax BR-6428NS router firmware version 1.10 enables authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the pptpUserName parameter in the /goform/formPPTPSetup endpoint. Publicly available exploit code exists, though no active exploitation has been confirmed. The vendor failed to respond to disclosure attempts, leaving affected devices unpatched.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis, as Edimax did not respond to the coordinated disclosure attempt. Owners should treat the device as end-of-support for security purposes and consider replacement with a currently-maintained router. As compensating controls, restrict access to the web management interface (typically TCP/80 and TCP/443) to a trusted management VLAN or specific admin IPs via firewall ACLs - this trades off remote administration convenience for safety; ensure remote/WAN-side administration is fully disabled (side effect: admins must be on-LAN or VPN'd in to manage the device); change default admin credentials and rotate them, since exploitation requires PR:L authentication so strong credentials meaningfully raise the bar; if the PPTP VPN feature is not in use, do not configure it via the affected form (note that this does not remove the vulnerable code path, only reduces operational reasons to touch it). Monitor VulDB entry https://vuldb.com/vuln/364401 for any future vendor response.

Affected VersionsENISA

BR-6428NS 1.10

Affected Packages

euvd br_6428ns no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the formPPTPSetup handler inside the device's embedded web management interface (/goform/ is the typical Boa/GoAhead-style CGI binding used by many SOHO routers, including Edimax models). The root cause is CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow / Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input): the handler copies the user-supplied pptpUserName POST argument into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking. Because embedded MIPS/ARM router firmware of this generation rarely enables stack canaries, ASLR, or non-executable stacks consistently, a stack overflow in a long-running httpd process can frequently be steered toward control-flow hijacking or, at minimum, a denial of service of the management plane. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:edimax:br-6428ns covering firmware 1.10.

Know when Br 6428Ns gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 7.4 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Analysis Updated
May 18, 2026 - 02:28 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
May 18, 2026 - 02:22 NVD
8.8 (HIGH) 7.4 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

A vulnerability has been found in Edimax BR-6428NS 1.10. This vulnerability affects the function formPPTPSetup of the file /goform/formPPTPSetup of the component POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument pptpUserName leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Edimax BR-6428NS routers (firmware 1.10) are vulnerable to a remote buffer overflow that allows authenticated attackers to corrupt device memory. Publicly available exploit code exists, and no vendor patch is forthcoming, exposing organizations using this model to immediate risk of network infrastructure compromise.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict access to router management interface via firewall rules, disable remote administrative access, implement network segmentation to isolate management plane, enforce strong authentication for any administrative access, and monitor management interface logs for suspicious connection attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 87% exploitable
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
4
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

57
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +37
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Related Vulnerabilities in Edimax BR-6428NS Buffer Overflow and Command Injection

View all 3

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy