Skip to main content

Quest Foglight CVE-2026-92192

HIGH
Path Traversal (CWE-22)
2026-11-04 zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com
8.8
CVSS 3.0 · Vendor: trendmicro
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to Foglight web interface
  2. Delivery
    Craft traversal path for installLicense
  3. Exploit
    Submit path to bypass validation
  4. Execution
    File operation runs as SYSTEM
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires valid authentication to the Quest Foglight for Databases management interface (CVSS PR:L), after which the attacker invokes the installLicense script with a maliciously crafted, user-supplied path that is used in file operations without proper validation (CWE-22 directory traversal). The limiting factor is the authentication requirement - this is not a pre-auth flaw; an attacker must first obtain or possess account access. The upside for the attacker, and the reason impact is rated high, is that the vulnerable installLicense operation executes in the SYSTEM context, so a successful traversal escalates to full host compromise. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N) against the application's licensing functionality.

Impact

The CVSS 3.0 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw requiring some authentication (PR:L) that yields full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - consistent with code execution in the SYSTEM context per the ZDI advisory. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or working proof-of-concept is present in the supplied data, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the single reference is the ZDI advisory (ZDI-26-855), which documents the finding but is not exploit code. The vuln.today decision label is 'this_week,' indicating elevated but not emergency urgency, which is coherent with a high-severity but not-yet-exploited bug. The key tension to flag: the CVSS vector specifies S:U (scope unchanged) and PR:L, yet the description states code runs as SYSTEM while the attacker is an authenticated (presumably lower-privileged) user - that privilege crossing arguably warrants scope-change (S:C) consideration; verify the authorization model with Quest. Net: a real priority for environments running Foglight for Databases, but the absence of active-exploitation and PoC signals means it is a patch-this-cycle item rather than a drop-everything emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds valid (low-privilege) credentials to a Quest Foglight for Databases installation submits a crafted path to the installLicense script, which fails to validate the user-supplied path before performing file operations. Because the operation runs in the SYSTEM context, the traversal lets the attacker write to or manipulate a file location that results in arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis; only the ZDI advisory is available.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Nov 04, 2026

Authenticated remote code execution in Quest Foglight for Databases lets an attacker with valid account access supply a crafted path to the installLicense script, traverse directories, and execute arbitrary code in the SYSTEM context. The flaw is rated CVSS 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) and requires authentication but no user interaction; no public exploit identified at time of analysis. It is tracked as ZDI-CAN-29215 / ZDI-26-855.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data; consult ZDI-26-855 (https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-855/) for vendor updates. Until a fix is available, reduce exposure by restricting network access to the Foglight management interface and the installLicense functionality to trusted administrative networks or localhost via firewall or reverse-proxy rules (trade-off: blocks legitimate remote administration); limiting Foglight accounts that can invoke licensing operations to the minimum necessary (trade-off: added administrative overhead); and alerting on path-traversal sequences in installLicense requests (trade-off: requires logging coverage and tuning).

Affected ProductsAI

Quest Foglight for Databases is affected. The available data does not specify exact version ranges or CPE identifiers; the vendor's ZDI advisory ZDI-26-855 (https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-855/) is the reference for affected builds. Organizations running Foglight for Databases with the installLicense script exposed through the management interface should treat installations as potentially affected until version-specific guidance is available.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a CWE-22 path traversal in the installLicense component of Quest Foglight for Databases. The script accepts a user-supplied path and uses it in file operations without proper validation, allowing directory traversal out of the intended license directory. Because the installLicense operation runs in the SYSTEM context, a successful traversal can place or invoke files with host-level privileges. The attack surface is the network-reachable management interface; the CVSS vector confirms PR:L, so the attacker must first authenticate. The trigger is the crafted path passed to installLicense; further details of the file operation are not described in the available sources.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (trendmicro) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable installLicense feature needs only low-privilege authentication (PR:L) and no interaction; traversal yields SYSTEM code execution, giving full C/I/A; S:U retained per advisory though SYSTEM execution could justify S:C.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (trendmicro).

CVSS VectorVendor: trendmicro

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Quest Foglight for Databases installLicense Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Quest Foglight for Databases. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability.

The specific flaw exists within the installLicense script. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-29215.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Quest Foglight for Databases, a monitoring platform used by database and infrastructure teams, carries a high-severity authenticated remote code execution flaw that would let anyone holding valid account credentials execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM-level privileges. Because exploitation requires only a legitimate account and no user interaction, any insider or compromised low-privilege credential could be escalated to full control of the monitoring host. Leadership should care because Foglight typically sits in privileged, well-connected network segments and any account compromise there could cascade into broader environment exposure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce strict least-privilege and multi-factor authentication on all Foglight accounts; restrict and monitor execution of the installLicense script; segment Foglight hosts away from sensitive systems; monitor authentication and process logs for anomalous path traversal or SYSTEM-level execution; consider disabling or tightly ACL-limiting the affected script where operationally feasible.

Threat Intelligence Overview

Prevalence
Medium
enterprise database-monitoring product, common in large shops but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
2 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS N/A
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy