Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessUser installs and runs malicious sandboxed app
-
ExploitApp submits crafted file path with traversal sequences
-
ExecutionWeak path validation resolves outside sandbox container
-
ImpactRead restricted files (confidentiality breach)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to get a sandboxed application installed and executed on the target Apple device (iOS/iPadOS 26.7-and-earlier / macOS Sequoia <15.8 / macOS 27-line pre-26.7 / visionOS <27) - i.e., local code already running inside the app sandbox (UI:R, user must launch the app). No network vector and no elevated privileges are needed (AV:L, PR:N), but exploitation is fundamentally gated on delivering and running malicious app code on-device; impact is confined to reading restricted files (confidentiality only), not modification or denial of service. This limits realistic risk to scenarios where a user is tricked into installing a rogue app or where the bug is chained after an initial foothold. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity local sandbox-escape/information-disclosure flaw, not an urgent priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) confirms the attack is local-only and requires a malicious app to already be running on the device, with impact limited to confidentiality (C:H) - reading restricted files outside the sandbox - with no integrity or availability effect. EPSS is very low at 0.17% (6th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no public exploit code was identified, so all real-world-exploitation signals point to low likelihood of opportunistic mass exploitation. No SSVC decision data was provided in the input. Signals are internally consistent: a local, C-only bug requiring attacker-controlled code on-device with EPSS/KEV/POC all indicating no active exploitation. The residual risk is that this class of sandbox-escape bug is valuable in chained iOS/macOS exploit paths (e.g., paired with an initial code-execution or a jailbreak/spyware chain), so it warrants routine patching but not emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker publishes or sideloads a sandboxed app (e.g., via the App Store, TestFlight, or enterprise/MDM distribution) that a user installs and launches. Once running, the app abuses insufficient path validation to traverse outside its sandbox container and read restricted files - such as other apps' data or protected system files - that its entitlements should forbid. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires the user to run the malicious app (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Sandboxed applications on Apple iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and visionOS can bypass sandbox file-access restrictions and read restricted files because of insufficient path validation in the affected operating system components (CWE-22). Exploitation requires a local attacker to get a crafted sandboxed app installed and launched by the user on a vulnerable device (CVSS 3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R), making this a delivery-gated, confidentiality-only information-disclosure flaw rather than a remotely reachable one. Apple has shipped fixes in iOS 26.7 and 27, iPadOS 26.7 and 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, macOS Golden Gate 27, and visionOS 27; no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, the EPSS score is only 0.17% (6th percentile), and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patches are available: upgrade to iOS 26.7 or 27, iPadOS 26.7 or 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, macOS Golden Gate 27, or visionOS 27 as applicable, following the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149034, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149038, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149041, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043; no workaround is documented, and because the flaw is fixed only by OS update, patching is the primary mitigation. Where immediate patching of every device is not feasible, the actionable compensating control is to deny the prerequisite of running attacker-supplied sandboxed code by enforcing an application allowlist or managed-install policy through MDM and by disabling sideloading, unmanaged enterprise-signed app installation, and developer mode on affected devices; the trade-off is reduced flexibility for internal app distribution and testing plus support friction for users who legitimately rely on sideloaded or self-built apps. Organizations that cannot centrally enforce those controls should prioritize patching devices and user populations most likely to install untrusted apps, and should treat this as a moderate, non-urgent item given the local delivery prerequisite, confidentiality-only impact, low EPSS score of 0.17%, and the absence of any identified public exploit or CISA KEV listing.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is a path-validation weakness in the operating system's filesystem and sandbox enforcement layer, classified as CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory, commonly path traversal). Apple addressed the permissions issue with improved path validation, meaning a sandboxed process could construct a path that resolved outside the container or entitlement-scoped directory it was confined to. The sandbox is the primary containment boundary on Apple platforms: applications are restricted to their own container plus explicitly granted entitlements, so a failure to canonicalize and validate paths before a file operation breaks the assumption that sandboxed code cannot reach other applications' or system files. The CPE data identifies the affected platform families as apple:ios_and_ipados, apple:macos, and apple:visionos, and the ENISA EUVD record EUVD-2026-77954 enumerates the vulnerable windows as iOS and iPadOS before 26.7 and before 27, macOS before 15.8, before 26.7, and before 27, and visionOS before 27. Per the assessed vector, the weakness requires no privileges (PR:N) but does require user interaction (UI:R) and a local execution context (AV:L), and impact is scored as high confidentiality loss with no integrity or availability effect, consistent with a read-only sandbox escape rather than arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation to root. This positions the bug as a post-foothold or app-delivery-dependent primitive: it is valuable when a malicious app is already running or when chained with another initial-access technique, but it does not by itself provide remote, unauthenticated compromise.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local malicious app (AV:L) needs no privileges (PR:N) but must be run by the user (UI:R); impact is reading restricted files, so C:H, I:N, A:N, sandbox stays within same authority scope (S:U).
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A permissions issue was addressed with improved path validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.7 and iPadOS 26.7, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, visionOS 27. A sandboxed app may be able to access restricted files.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-77954
GHSA-mp35-xh8v-7rxq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB